Sustainable fisheries management through reliable restocking and stock enhancement evaluation with environmental DNA

[1]  M. Osathanunkul,et al.  eDNA testing reveals surprising findings on fish population dynamics in Thailand , 2023, Heliyon.

[2]  R. Fujita,et al.  Evaluating adaptive management frameworks for data-limited crustacean fisheries. , 2023, Journal of environmental management.

[3]  S. R. Batlouni,et al.  The environmental licensing of hydroelectrics and the interface with migratory fish and aquaculture in Brazil , 2023, Boletim do Instituto de Pesca.

[4]  Asami,et al.  Using eDNA metabarcoding to establish targets for freshwater fish composition following river restoration , 2023, Global Ecology and Conservation.

[5]  Sergio Ramírez-Amaro,et al.  Environmental DNA: State-of-the-art of its application for fisheries assessment in marine environments , 2022, Frontiers in Marine Science.

[6]  N. Andayani,et al.  Detection of Red-Eared Slider (Trachemys scripta elegans) using Environmental DNA with Cytochrome b Primer , 2022, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.

[7]  R. Brys,et al.  Experimental assessment of downstream environmental DNA patterns under variable fish biomass and river discharge rates , 2022, Environmental DNA.

[8]  T. Schenekar The current state of eDNA research in freshwater ecosystems: are we shifting from the developmental phase to standard application in biomonitoring? , 2022, Hydrobiologia.

[9]  Charles Lutz Stocking strategies , 2022, CABI Compendium.

[10]  J. J. Day,et al.  Biodiversity assessment across a dynamic riverine system: A comparison of eDNA metabarcoding versus traditional fish surveying methods , 2021, Environmental DNA.

[11]  M. Kinnison,et al.  Spatial Heterogeneity of eDNA Transport Improves Stream Assessment of Threatened Salmon Presence, Abundance, and Location , 2021, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution.

[12]  V. Savolainen,et al.  Meta‐analysis shows that environmental DNA outperforms traditional surveys, but warrants better reporting standards , 2021, Ecology and evolution.

[13]  A. Mamun,et al.  The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on fish consumption and household food security in Dhaka city, Bangladesh , 2021, Global Food Security.

[14]  A. Munguía-Vega,et al.  Integrating eDNA metabarcoding and simultaneous underwater visual surveys to describe complex fish communities in a marine biodiversity hotspot , 2021, Molecular ecology resources.

[15]  Jun Xu,et al.  Human impacts on global freshwater fish biodiversity , 2021, Science.

[16]  D. Rodriguez-Barreto,et al.  Using eDNA Metabarcoding to Monitor Changes in Fish Community Composition After Barrier Removal , 2021, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution.

[17]  T. Minamoto,et al.  Complex interactions between environmental DNA (eDNA) state and water chemistries on eDNA persistence suggested by meta‐analyses , 2021, Molecular ecology resources.

[18]  T. Minamoto,et al.  A molecular survey based on eDNA to assess the presence of a clown featherback (Chitala ornata) in a confined environment , 2020, PeerJ.

[19]  Andrew S. Buxton,et al.  An Rshiny app for modelling environmental DNA data: accounting for false positive and false negative observation error , 2020, bioRxiv.

[20]  X. Pochon,et al.  Metabarcoding as a tool to enhance marine surveillance of nonindigenous species in tropical harbors: A case study in Tahiti , 2020 .

[21]  S. Brosse,et al.  Characterizing the spatial signal of environmental DNA in river systems using a community ecology approach , 2020, bioRxiv.

[22]  Samuel J. Brenkman,et al.  Environmental DNA is an effective tool to track recolonizing migratory fish following large‐scale dam removal , 2020, Environmental DNA.

[23]  D. Lodge,et al.  Calibrating Environmental DNA Metabarcoding to Conventional Surveys for Measuring Fish Species Richness , 2020, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution.

[24]  R. Hilborn,et al.  A Path to a Sustainable Trawl Fishery in Southeast Asia , 2020 .

[25]  A. Ludwig,et al.  Standards for Methods Utilizing Environmental DNA for Detection of Fish Species , 2020, Genes.

[26]  M. Kinnison,et al.  Experimental assessment of optimal lotic eDNA sampling and assay multiplexing for a critically endangered fish , 2020 .

[27]  Jim E. Griffin,et al.  Modelling environmental DNA data; Bayesian variable selection accounting for false positive and false negative errors , 2019, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics).

[28]  P. Xu,et al.  Investigating the distribution of the Yangtze finless porpoise in the Yangtze River using environmental DNA , 2019, PloS one.

[29]  H. Kishino,et al.  Rigorous monitoring of a large-scale marine stock enhancement program demonstrates the need for comprehensive management of fisheries and nursery habitat , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[30]  Peter T. Kuriyama,et al.  Investigating three sources of bias in hook-and-line surveys: survey design, gear saturation, and multispecies interactions , 2019, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences.

[31]  Lynsey R. Harper,et al.  Limited dispersion and quick degradation of environmental DNA in fish ponds inferred by metabarcoding , 2018, bioRxiv.

[32]  Lynsey R. Harper,et al.  Prospects and challenges of environmental DNA (eDNA) monitoring in freshwater ponds , 2018, Hydrobiologia.

[33]  M. Jansen,et al.  Accuracy, limitations and cost-efficiency of eDNA-based community survey in tropical frogs , 2017, bioRxiv.

[34]  D. Bolster,et al.  Water Flow and Biofilm Cover Influence Environmental DNA Detection in Recirculating Streams. , 2018, Environmental science & technology.

[35]  D. Pont,et al.  Environmental DNA reveals quantitative patterns of fish biodiversity in large rivers despite its downstream transportation , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[36]  R. Dorazio,et al.  ednaoccupancy: An r package for multiscale occupancy modelling of environmental DNA data , 2018, Molecular ecology resources.

[37]  Holly M. Bik,et al.  Acidity promotes degradation of multi-species environmental DNA in lotic mesocosms , 2018, Communications Biology.

[38]  J. Britton,et al.  Application of environmental DNA analysis to inform invasive fish eradication operations , 2017, The Science of Nature.

[39]  Lorenzo Vilizzi,et al.  Application of environmental DNA analysis to inform invasive fish eradication operations , 2017, The Science of Nature.

[40]  Gregory D. Williams,et al.  Spatial distribution of environmental DNA in a nearshore marine habitat , 2017, PeerJ.

[41]  Adam J. Sepulveda,et al.  Potential of Environmental DNA to Evaluate Northern Pike (Esox lucius) Eradication Efforts: An Experimental Test and Case Study , 2016, PloS one.

[42]  Masayuki Ushio,et al.  Environmental DNA enables detection of terrestrial mammals from forest pond water , 2016, bioRxiv.

[43]  D. Bolster,et al.  Influence of Stream Bottom Substrate on Retention and Transport of Vertebrate Environmental DNA. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[44]  M. P. Piggott Evaluating the effects of laboratory protocols on eDNA detection probability for an endangered freshwater fish , 2016, Ecology and evolution.

[45]  U. Obolski,et al.  Potential contribution of fish restocking to the recovery of deteriorated coral reefs: an alternative restoration method? , 2016, PeerJ.

[46]  Jesse A. Port,et al.  Assessing vertebrate biodiversity in a kelp forest ecosystem using environmental DNA , 2015, Molecular ecology.

[47]  H. Doi,et al.  Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR) outperforms real-time PCR in the detection of environmental DNA from an invasive fish species. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[48]  Helen C. Rees,et al.  REVIEW: The detection of aquatic animal species using environmental DNA – a review of eDNA as a survey tool in ecology , 2014 .

[49]  Jeffrey E. Hill,et al.  Assessing Environmental DNA Detection in Controlled Lentic Systems , 2014, PloS one.

[50]  Robert S. Arkle,et al.  Estimating occupancy and abundance of stream amphibians using environmental DNA from filtered water samples , 2013 .

[51]  D. Shimizu,et al.  Successful stocking of a depleted species, spotted halibut Verasper variegatus, in Miyako Bay, Japan: evaluation from post-release surveys and landings , 2010 .

[52]  N. Tuan,et al.  Mekong Giant Fish Species: On Their Management and Biology , 2002 .

[53]  G. Graaf,et al.  Growth and mortality of the catfish, Hemisynodontis membranaceus (Geoffroy St. Hilaire), in the northern arm of Lake Volta, Ghana , 2001 .

[54]  I. Winfield,et al.  Genetics of whitefish and vendace in England and Wales , 1995 .

[55]  M. Kelly-Quinn,et al.  Survival of stocked hatchery‐reared brown trout, Salmo trutta L., fry in relation to the carrying capacity of a trout nursery stream , 1989 .

[56]  M. Osathanunkul An eDNA detection of captive-bred Mekong Giant Catfish in the Chao Phraya River basin for further environmental impacts assessment , 2022 .

[57]  Fisheries, aquaculture and COVID-19: Issues and policy responses , 2020 .

[58]  D. Leskien The State of the World's Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture , 2019 .

[59]  T. Jutagate,et al.  Freshwater Fish Diversity in Thailand and the Challenges on Its Prosperity Due To River Damming , 2016 .

[60]  B. Ingram,et al.  General aspects of stock enhancement in fi sheries developments , 2015 .

[61]  J. Norriss,et al.  Stock enhancement as a fisheries management tool , 2005, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[62]  S. D. Silva,et al.  A review of stock enhancement practices in the inland water fisheries of Asia , 2005 .

[63]  W. Rainboth FAO species identification field guide for fishery purposes. Fishes of the Cambodian Mekong. , 1996 .

[64]  G. L. Jackson An alternative restoration method. , 1978, Dental survey.

[65]  Important considerations in stock enhancement , 2022 .