Sustainable fisheries management through reliable restocking and stock enhancement evaluation with environmental DNA
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] M. Osathanunkul,et al. eDNA testing reveals surprising findings on fish population dynamics in Thailand , 2023, Heliyon.
[2] R. Fujita,et al. Evaluating adaptive management frameworks for data-limited crustacean fisheries. , 2023, Journal of environmental management.
[3] S. R. Batlouni,et al. The environmental licensing of hydroelectrics and the interface with migratory fish and aquaculture in Brazil , 2023, Boletim do Instituto de Pesca.
[4] Asami,et al. Using eDNA metabarcoding to establish targets for freshwater fish composition following river restoration , 2023, Global Ecology and Conservation.
[5] Sergio Ramírez-Amaro,et al. Environmental DNA: State-of-the-art of its application for fisheries assessment in marine environments , 2022, Frontiers in Marine Science.
[6] N. Andayani,et al. Detection of Red-Eared Slider (Trachemys scripta elegans) using Environmental DNA with Cytochrome b Primer , 2022, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.
[7] R. Brys,et al. Experimental assessment of downstream environmental DNA patterns under variable fish biomass and river discharge rates , 2022, Environmental DNA.
[8] T. Schenekar. The current state of eDNA research in freshwater ecosystems: are we shifting from the developmental phase to standard application in biomonitoring? , 2022, Hydrobiologia.
[9] Charles Lutz. Stocking strategies , 2022, CABI Compendium.
[10] J. J. Day,et al. Biodiversity assessment across a dynamic riverine system: A comparison of eDNA metabarcoding versus traditional fish surveying methods , 2021, Environmental DNA.
[11] M. Kinnison,et al. Spatial Heterogeneity of eDNA Transport Improves Stream Assessment of Threatened Salmon Presence, Abundance, and Location , 2021, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution.
[12] V. Savolainen,et al. Meta‐analysis shows that environmental DNA outperforms traditional surveys, but warrants better reporting standards , 2021, Ecology and evolution.
[13] A. Mamun,et al. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on fish consumption and household food security in Dhaka city, Bangladesh , 2021, Global Food Security.
[14] A. Munguía-Vega,et al. Integrating eDNA metabarcoding and simultaneous underwater visual surveys to describe complex fish communities in a marine biodiversity hotspot , 2021, Molecular ecology resources.
[15] Jun Xu,et al. Human impacts on global freshwater fish biodiversity , 2021, Science.
[16] D. Rodriguez-Barreto,et al. Using eDNA Metabarcoding to Monitor Changes in Fish Community Composition After Barrier Removal , 2021, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution.
[17] T. Minamoto,et al. Complex interactions between environmental DNA (eDNA) state and water chemistries on eDNA persistence suggested by meta‐analyses , 2021, Molecular ecology resources.
[18] T. Minamoto,et al. A molecular survey based on eDNA to assess the presence of a clown featherback (Chitala ornata) in a confined environment , 2020, PeerJ.
[19] Andrew S. Buxton,et al. An Rshiny app for modelling environmental DNA data: accounting for false positive and false negative observation error , 2020, bioRxiv.
[20] X. Pochon,et al. Metabarcoding as a tool to enhance marine surveillance of nonindigenous species in tropical harbors: A case study in Tahiti , 2020 .
[21] S. Brosse,et al. Characterizing the spatial signal of environmental DNA in river systems using a community ecology approach , 2020, bioRxiv.
[22] Samuel J. Brenkman,et al. Environmental DNA is an effective tool to track recolonizing migratory fish following large‐scale dam removal , 2020, Environmental DNA.
[23] D. Lodge,et al. Calibrating Environmental DNA Metabarcoding to Conventional Surveys for Measuring Fish Species Richness , 2020, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution.
[24] R. Hilborn,et al. A Path to a Sustainable Trawl Fishery in Southeast Asia , 2020 .
[25] A. Ludwig,et al. Standards for Methods Utilizing Environmental DNA for Detection of Fish Species , 2020, Genes.
[26] M. Kinnison,et al. Experimental assessment of optimal lotic eDNA sampling and assay multiplexing for a critically endangered fish , 2020 .
[27] Jim E. Griffin,et al. Modelling environmental DNA data; Bayesian variable selection accounting for false positive and false negative errors , 2019, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics).
[28] P. Xu,et al. Investigating the distribution of the Yangtze finless porpoise in the Yangtze River using environmental DNA , 2019, PloS one.
[29] H. Kishino,et al. Rigorous monitoring of a large-scale marine stock enhancement program demonstrates the need for comprehensive management of fisheries and nursery habitat , 2019, Scientific Reports.
[30] Peter T. Kuriyama,et al. Investigating three sources of bias in hook-and-line surveys: survey design, gear saturation, and multispecies interactions , 2019, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences.
[31] Lynsey R. Harper,et al. Limited dispersion and quick degradation of environmental DNA in fish ponds inferred by metabarcoding , 2018, bioRxiv.
[32] Lynsey R. Harper,et al. Prospects and challenges of environmental DNA (eDNA) monitoring in freshwater ponds , 2018, Hydrobiologia.
[33] M. Jansen,et al. Accuracy, limitations and cost-efficiency of eDNA-based community survey in tropical frogs , 2017, bioRxiv.
[34] D. Bolster,et al. Water Flow and Biofilm Cover Influence Environmental DNA Detection in Recirculating Streams. , 2018, Environmental science & technology.
[35] D. Pont,et al. Environmental DNA reveals quantitative patterns of fish biodiversity in large rivers despite its downstream transportation , 2018, Scientific Reports.
[36] R. Dorazio,et al. ednaoccupancy: An r package for multiscale occupancy modelling of environmental DNA data , 2018, Molecular ecology resources.
[37] Holly M. Bik,et al. Acidity promotes degradation of multi-species environmental DNA in lotic mesocosms , 2018, Communications Biology.
[38] J. Britton,et al. Application of environmental DNA analysis to inform invasive fish eradication operations , 2017, The Science of Nature.
[39] Lorenzo Vilizzi,et al. Application of environmental DNA analysis to inform invasive fish eradication operations , 2017, The Science of Nature.
[40] Gregory D. Williams,et al. Spatial distribution of environmental DNA in a nearshore marine habitat , 2017, PeerJ.
[41] Adam J. Sepulveda,et al. Potential of Environmental DNA to Evaluate Northern Pike (Esox lucius) Eradication Efforts: An Experimental Test and Case Study , 2016, PloS one.
[42] Masayuki Ushio,et al. Environmental DNA enables detection of terrestrial mammals from forest pond water , 2016, bioRxiv.
[43] D. Bolster,et al. Influence of Stream Bottom Substrate on Retention and Transport of Vertebrate Environmental DNA. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.
[44] M. P. Piggott. Evaluating the effects of laboratory protocols on eDNA detection probability for an endangered freshwater fish , 2016, Ecology and evolution.
[45] U. Obolski,et al. Potential contribution of fish restocking to the recovery of deteriorated coral reefs: an alternative restoration method? , 2016, PeerJ.
[46] Jesse A. Port,et al. Assessing vertebrate biodiversity in a kelp forest ecosystem using environmental DNA , 2015, Molecular ecology.
[47] H. Doi,et al. Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR) outperforms real-time PCR in the detection of environmental DNA from an invasive fish species. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.
[48] Helen C. Rees,et al. REVIEW: The detection of aquatic animal species using environmental DNA – a review of eDNA as a survey tool in ecology , 2014 .
[49] Jeffrey E. Hill,et al. Assessing Environmental DNA Detection in Controlled Lentic Systems , 2014, PloS one.
[50] Robert S. Arkle,et al. Estimating occupancy and abundance of stream amphibians using environmental DNA from filtered water samples , 2013 .
[51] D. Shimizu,et al. Successful stocking of a depleted species, spotted halibut Verasper variegatus, in Miyako Bay, Japan: evaluation from post-release surveys and landings , 2010 .
[52] N. Tuan,et al. Mekong Giant Fish Species: On Their Management and Biology , 2002 .
[53] G. Graaf,et al. Growth and mortality of the catfish, Hemisynodontis membranaceus (Geoffroy St. Hilaire), in the northern arm of Lake Volta, Ghana , 2001 .
[54] I. Winfield,et al. Genetics of whitefish and vendace in England and Wales , 1995 .
[55] M. Kelly-Quinn,et al. Survival of stocked hatchery‐reared brown trout, Salmo trutta L., fry in relation to the carrying capacity of a trout nursery stream , 1989 .
[56] M. Osathanunkul. An eDNA detection of captive-bred Mekong Giant Catfish in the Chao Phraya River basin for further environmental impacts assessment , 2022 .
[57] Fisheries, aquaculture and COVID-19: Issues and policy responses , 2020 .
[58] D. Leskien. The State of the World's Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture , 2019 .
[59] T. Jutagate,et al. Freshwater Fish Diversity in Thailand and the Challenges on Its Prosperity Due To River Damming , 2016 .
[60] B. Ingram,et al. General aspects of stock enhancement in fi sheries developments , 2015 .
[61] J. Norriss,et al. Stock enhancement as a fisheries management tool , 2005, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.
[62] S. D. Silva,et al. A review of stock enhancement practices in the inland water fisheries of Asia , 2005 .
[63] W. Rainboth. FAO species identification field guide for fishery purposes. Fishes of the Cambodian Mekong. , 1996 .
[64] G. L. Jackson. An alternative restoration method. , 1978, Dental survey.
[65] Important considerations in stock enhancement , 2022 .