On the path to sustainability: integrating social dimensions into the research and practice of environmental management

The theme of the Tenth International Conference of the Greening of Industry Network in Goteborg, Sweden, was focused on exploring the social dimensions of sustainability. This focus is timely because extant research and practice in sustainability has emphasized the environmental dimension. The UNWCED definition of sustainable development as ‘development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs’ is clear about the integration of the economic, ecological and social impacts of development (UNWCED, 1987, p. 43). As underlined by UNWCED, sustainable development refers to the concept of ‘needs’, but limitations imposed by the state of technology and social organizations on the environment's ability to meet present and future needs are also a central concern. Lafferty and Langhelle (1999) suggest that sustainable development must be treated as an ethical code for human survival and progress, and it is on a par with other high-minded ideas such as democracy, freedom and human rights. The ‘openness of meaning’ of such concepts can never be closed and the fruitfulness of the concept of sustainable development is linked to continued political discourse on the concept's content and future goals and to the continuing debate about the instrumental implications of its normative aspirations (Lafferty and Langhelle, 1999, p. 26). The tenth GIN conference with its explicit focus on the social dimensions of sustainability facilitated the continuation of this discourse. Just as scholars and practitioners concerned with sustainable development have focused mainly on environmental management, those concerned with corporate social responsibility (CSR) have focused on social and ethical issues such as human rights, working conditions and philanthropy. The social principles of justice and inclusiveness embedded in the concept of sustainable development have entered the corporate or research agenda to a very limited extent, even among firms making promising environmental efforts at a global scale (Ruud, 2002a). Promoting sustainable development requires that governments incorporate these principles into designing holistic policies that motivate and enable firms to develop more sustainable strategies (Roome and Cahill, 2001). This was also underlined by the chief executive officer of the Volvo group during the first plenary session of the GIN conference in Gothenburg. We begin by examining to what extent the social aspects of sustainability have been integrated into public policy and government regulations and then into organizational research and practice. We then examine the extent to which the best representative papers in this volume from the tenth GIN conference have been able to achieve the integration of social and environmental dimensions. We conclude with some thoughts on future directions for sustainability research. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

[1]  Paul A. Zandbergen,et al.  Ecologically Sustainable Organizations: An Institutional Approach , 1995 .

[2]  R. Klassen,et al.  The impact of environmental management on firm performance , 1996 .

[3]  U. Steger,et al.  The Roles of Supervisory Support Behaviors and Environmental Policy in Employee “Ecoinitiatives” at Leading-Edge European Companies. , 2000 .

[4]  Pieter Glasbergen,et al.  The Question of Environmental Governance , 1998 .

[5]  Stuart L. Hart,et al.  DOES IT PAY TO BE GREEN? AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EMISSION REDUCTION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE , 1996 .

[6]  Andrew J. Hoffman,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL EVOLUTION AND CHANGE: ENVIRONMENTALISM AND THE US CHEMICAL INDUSTRY , 1999 .

[7]  Guoming Xian,et al.  Environmental Management in Transnational Corporations in China , 2000 .

[8]  A. Ruud Can transnational aluminium producers be ecologically sustainable? A case study of Jamaica's bauxite/alumina industry , 1994 .

[9]  G. H. Brundtland World Commission on environment and development , 1985 .

[10]  Towards Sustainable Development: On the Goals of Development - and the Conditions of Sustainability , 1999 .

[11]  Audun Ruud,et al.  Environmental management of transnational corporations in India—are TNCs creating islands of environmental excellence in a sea of dirt? , 2002 .

[12]  Sanjay Sharma Managerial Interpretations and Organizational Context as Predictors of Corporate Choice of Environmental Strategy , 2000 .

[13]  Perry Sadorsky,et al.  The Relationship Between Environmental Commitment and Managerial Perceptions of Stakeholder Importance , 1999 .

[14]  M. Starik,et al.  Weaving An Integrated Web: Multilevel and Multisystem Perspectives of Ecologically Sustainable Organizations , 1995 .

[15]  Stuart L. Hart,et al.  Do Corporate Global Environmental Standards Create or Destroy Market Value , 2000 .

[16]  Stuart L. Hart,et al.  Global Sustainability and the Creative Destruction of Industries , 1999 .

[17]  Sanjay Sharma,et al.  Strategic Bridging: A Role for the Multinational Corporation in Third World Development , 1994 .

[18]  A. Marcus,et al.  On the Edge: Heeding the Warnings of Unusual Events , 1999 .

[19]  Mark Cordano,et al.  Pollution Reduction Preferences of U.S. Environmental Managers: Applying Ajzen'S Theory of Planned Behavior , 2000 .

[20]  T. Gladwin,et al.  Shifting Paradigms for Sustainable Development: Implications for Management Theory and Research , 1995 .

[21]  Nigel Roome,et al.  Developing environmental management strategies , 1992 .

[22]  Charles O. Holliday,et al.  Walking the Talk: The Business Case for Sustainable Development , 2002 .

[23]  Clinton Andrews Industrial Ecology and Global Change: Policies to Encourage Clean Technology , 1994 .

[24]  William M. Lafferty,et al.  Towards Sustainable Development , 1999 .

[25]  Chad Nehrt,et al.  TIMING AND INTENSITY EFFECTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTMENTS , 1996 .

[26]  Peter Grabosky,et al.  Smart Regulation: Designing Environmental Policy , 1999 .

[27]  C. Egri,et al.  Leadership in the North American Environmental Sector: Values, Leadership Styles, and Contexts of Environmental Leaders and their Organizations , 2000 .

[28]  Sumit K. Majumdar,et al.  Rules Versus Discretion: The Productivity Consequences of Flexible Regulation , 2001 .

[29]  Petra Christmann Effects of “Best Practices” of Environmental Management on Cost Advantage: The Role of Complementary Assets , 2000 .

[30]  Michael J. Lenox,et al.  Industry Self-Regulation Without Sanctions: The Chemical Industry's Responsible Care Program , 2000 .

[31]  L. M. Anderson,et al.  Individual Environmental Initiative: Championing Natural Environmental Issues in U.S. Business Organizations , 2000 .

[32]  Sanjay Sharma,et al.  A Contingent Resource-Based View of Proactive Corporate Environmental Strategy , 2003 .

[33]  M. Russo,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective On Corporate Environmental Performance And Profitability , 1997 .