Semi-nonparametric Latent Class Choice Model with a Flexible Class Membership Component: A Mixture Model Approach

This study presents a semi-nonparametric Latent Class Choice Model (LCCM) with a flexible class membership component. The proposed model formulates the latent classes using mixture models as an alternative approach to the traditional random utility specification with the aim of comparing the two approaches on various measures including prediction accuracy and representation of heterogeneity in the choice process. Mixture models are parametric model-based clustering techniques that have been widely used in areas such as machine learning, data mining and patter recognition for clustering and classification problems. An Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm is derived for the estimation of the proposed model. Using two different case studies on travel mode choice behavior, the proposed model is compared to traditional discrete choice models on the basis of parameter estimates' signs, value of time, statistical goodness-of-fit measures, and cross-validation tests. Results show that mixture models improve the overall performance of latent class choice models by providing better out-of-sample prediction accuracy in addition to better representations of heterogeneity without weakening the behavioral and economic interpretability of the choice models.

[1]  Stephen J. Wright,et al.  Numerical Optimization , 2018, Fundamental Statistical Inference.

[2]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  Taste heterogeneity, correlation and elasticities in latent class choice models , 2009 .

[3]  Paul D. McNicholas,et al.  Model-based clustering of microarray expression data via latent Gaussian mixture models , 2010, Bioinform..

[4]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Revealing additional dimensions of preference heterogeneity in a latent class mixed multinomial logit model , 2010 .

[5]  Kenneth Train,et al.  Mixed logit with a flexible mixing distribution , 2016 .

[6]  Dinesh Gopinath,et al.  Modeling heterogeneity in discrete choice proceses : application to travel demand , 1995 .

[7]  Chi Xie,et al.  WORK TRAVEL MODE CHOICE MODELING USING DATA MINING: DECISION TREES AND NEURAL NETWORKS , 2002 .

[8]  Isam Kaysi,et al.  Multivariate count data models for adoption of new transport modes in an organization-based context , 2020 .

[9]  C. Manski Daniel McFadden and the Econometric Analysis of Discrete Choice , 2001 .

[10]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[11]  Giulio Erberto Cantarella,et al.  Multilayer Feedforward Networks for Transportation Mode Choice Analysis: An Analysis and a Comparison with Random Utility Models , 2005 .

[12]  Stephane Hess,et al.  Competing methods for representing random taste heterogeneity in discrete choice models , 2006 .

[13]  Geoffrey J. McLachlan,et al.  Deep Gaussian mixture models , 2017, Statistics and Computing.

[14]  Dongwoo Lee,et al.  Comparison of Four Types of Artificial Neural Network and a Multinomial Logit Model for Travel Mode Choice Modeling , 2018, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

[15]  Dinesh Ambat Gopimatj Modeling heterogeneity in discrete choice processes: Application to travel demand. , 1997 .

[16]  Michel Bierlaire,et al.  PythonBiogeme: a short introduction , 2016 .

[17]  T. Hillel,et al.  Weak teachers: Assisted specification of discrete choice models using ensemble learning , 2019 .

[18]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[19]  Akshay Vij,et al.  Incorporating the influence of latent modal preferences on travel mode choice behavior , 2013 .

[20]  Oira Home,et al.  Office of Institutional Research and Assessment , 2008 .

[21]  D. McFadden,et al.  MIXED MNL MODELS FOR DISCRETE RESPONSE , 2000 .

[22]  Rico Krueger,et al.  Random taste heterogeneity in discrete choice models: Flexible nonparametric finite mixture distributions , 2017 .

[23]  Ying Jin,et al.  Recreating passenger mode choice-sets for transport simulation: A case study of London, UK , 2018 .

[24]  C. Angelo Guevara Mode-valued differences of in-vehicle travel time Savings , 2017 .

[25]  Rick L. Andrews,et al.  An Empirical Comparison of Logit Choice Models with Discrete versus Continuous Representations of Heterogeneity , 2002 .

[26]  Virginie Lurkin,et al.  Enhancing Discrete Choice Models with Neural Networks , 2018 .

[27]  Seiichi Kagaya,et al.  Development of Transport Mode Choice Model by Using Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System , 2006 .

[28]  Florian Heiss,et al.  Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2016 .

[29]  P. Deb Finite Mixture Models , 2008 .

[30]  David A. Hensher,et al.  A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: contrasts with mixed logit , 2003 .

[31]  Kenneth Train,et al.  EM algorithms for nonparametric estimation of mixing distributions , 2008 .

[32]  Ch. Ravi Sekhar,et al.  Multimodal Choice Modeling Using Random Forest Decision Trees , 2016 .

[33]  Robert L. Hicks,et al.  Combining Discrete and Continuous Representations of Preference Heterogeneity: A Latent Class Approach , 2010 .

[34]  Gérard Govaert,et al.  Assessing a Mixture Model for Clustering with the Integrated Completed Likelihood , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[35]  Rico Krueger,et al.  A Dirichlet Process Mixture Model of Discrete Choice , 2018, 1801.06296.

[36]  Radford M. Neal Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2007, Technometrics.

[37]  D. McFadden Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[38]  Jian-Chuan Xian-Yu,et al.  Travel Mode Choice Analysis Using Support Vector Machines , 2011 .

[39]  Guillaume-Alexandre Bilodeau,et al.  Discriminative conditional restricted Boltzmann machine for discrete choice and latent variable modelling , 2017, ArXiv.

[40]  Nada Wasi,et al.  COMPARING ALTERNATIVE MODELS OF HETEROGENEITY IN CONSUMER CHOICE BEHAVIOR , 2012 .

[41]  Akshay Vij,et al.  Machine Learning Meets Microeconomics: The Case of Decision Trees and Discrete Choice , 2017, 1711.04826.

[42]  Chenfeng Xiong,et al.  Decision tree method for modeling travel mode switching in a dynamic behavioral process , 2015 .

[43]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  An Endogenous Segmentation Mode Choice Model with an Application to Intercity Travel , 1997, Transp. Sci..

[44]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Modelling inter-urban transport flows in Italy: A comparison between neural network analysis and logit analysis , 1996 .

[45]  John M. Rose,et al.  Accounting for heterogeneity in the variance of unobserved effects in mixed logit models , 2006 .

[46]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Methodological issues in modelling time-of-travel preferences , 2013 .

[47]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  PASSENGER TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING , 2000 .

[48]  Uneb Gazder,et al.  A new logit‐artificial neural network ensemble for mode choice modeling: a case study for border transport , 2015 .