Argument exchange in heterogeneous electronic commerce environments

Argumentation enables agents to justify their actions and to reach stable situations faster, due to the amount of information that is exchanged. Logic and, in special, Extended Logic Programming (ELP) provides a way to develop arguments which are mathematically correct and close to a working prototype. Logic-based argumentation exhibits a set of unparalleled features such as: adequacy to logic-based approaches to pre-argument reasoning, similarity to the human reasoning processes, reasoning with incomplete information, and argument composition and extension, among many others.Electronic Commerce (EC) poses new challenges to argumentation due to the presence of heterogeneous environments. The ontological problems raised by such environments have been approached by the use of eXtensible Markup Language (XML) frameworks. Thus, solving the problem of argument exchange in heterogeneous environments should build on such frameworks. CommerceNet's eCo framework provides a 7-layer framework on which an argumentation service can be easily built.

[1]  Benjamin N. Grosof,et al.  A declarative approach to business rules in contracts: courteous logic programs in XML , 2015, EC '99.

[2]  José Neves,et al.  Mediation, Agreement and Gratitude in Strategic Planning for Virtual Organisations , 2000, ICEIS.

[3]  José Neves,et al.  Temporality, Priorities and Delegation in an E-Commerce Environment , 2001, Bled eConference.

[4]  Ronald Prescott Loui,et al.  Defeat among arguments: a system of defeasible inference , 1987, Comput. Intell..

[5]  Sarvapali D. Ramchurn,et al.  Argumentation-based negotiation , 2003, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[6]  Simon Parsons,et al.  Modelling dialogues using argumentation , 2000, Proceedings Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems.

[7]  Katia Sycara,et al.  Persuasive argumentation in negotiation , 1990 .

[8]  Chitta Baral,et al.  Logic Programming and Knowledge Representation , 1994, J. Log. Program..

[9]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Argumentation as distributed constraint satisfaction: applications and results , 2001, AGENTS '01.

[10]  Giovanni Sartor,et al.  A Formal Model of Legal Argumentation , 1994 .

[11]  Laura Giordano,et al.  Translating a Modal Language with Embedded Implication into Horn Clause Logic , 1996, ELP.

[12]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Argumentation and Multi-Agent Decision Making , 1998, AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.

[13]  Henry Prakken,et al.  Argument-Based Extended Logic Programming with Defeasible Priorities , 1997, J. Appl. Non Class. Logics.

[14]  Henry Prakken,et al.  Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument , 1997 .

[15]  D. Walton,et al.  Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning , 1995 .

[16]  José Neves,et al.  On the Logical Aspects of Argument-Based Negotiation among Agents , 2001, CIA.