Capturing the behavioural determinants behind the adoption of autonomous vehicles: Conceptual frameworks and measurement models to predict public transport, sharing and ownership trends of self-driving cars

Abstract Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) have the potential to make motorized transport safer and more sustainable, by integrating clean technologies and supporting flexible shared-mobility services. Leveraging this new form of transport to transform mobility in cities will depend fundamentally on public acceptance of AVs, and the ways in which individuals choose to use them, to meet their daily travel needs. Empirical studies exploring public attitudes towards automated driving technologies and interest in AVs have emerged in the last few years. However, within this strand of research there is a paucity of theory-driven and behaviourally consistent methodologies to unpack the determinants of user adoption decisions with respect to AVs. In this paper, we seek to fill this gap, by advancing and testing four conceptual frameworks which could be deployed to capture the range of possible behavioural influences on individuals’ AV adoption decisions. The frameworks integrate socio-demographic variables and relevant latent behavioural factors, including perceived benefits and perceived ease of use of AVs, public fears and anxieties regarding AVs, subjective norm, perceived behavioural control, and attitudinal factors covering the environment, technology, collaborative consumption, public transit and car ownership. We demonstrate the utility and validity of the frameworks, by translating the latent variables into indicator items in a structured questionnaire, and administering it online to a random sample of adult individuals (n = 507). Using the survey data in confirmatory factor analyses, we specify and demonstrate scale reliability of indicator items, and convergent and discriminant validity of relationships among latent variables. Ultimately, we advance four measurement models. These theory-grounded measurement models are intended for application in research aimed at understanding and predicting (a) AV interest and adoption intentions, and (b) user adoption decisions regarding three different AV modes: ownership, sharing and public transport.

[1]  M. Conner,et al.  Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: a meta-analytic review. , 2001, The British journal of social psychology.

[2]  Mette Møller,et al.  Understanding adolescents' intentions to commute by car or bicycle as adults , 2013 .

[3]  J. Gliem,et al.  Calculating, Interpreting, And Reporting Cronbach’s Alpha Reliability Coefficient For Likert-Type Scales , 2003 .

[4]  Ching-Yao Chan.  Advancements, prospects, and impacts of automated driving systems , 2017 .

[5]  Wenwen Zhang,et al.  Exploring the impact of shared autonomous vehicles on urban parking demand: An agent-based simulation approach , 2015 .

[6]  K. Glanz,et al.  An Ecological Perspective on Health Promotion Programs , 1988, Health education quarterly.

[7]  O. Mont.  Institutionalisation of sustainable consumption patterns based on shared use , 2004 .

[8]  F. Morhart,et al.  Fair Is Good, but What Is Fair? Negotiations of Distributive Justice in an Emerging Nonmonetary Sharing Model , 2016, Journal of the Association for Consumer Research.

[9]  Mark Vandenbosch,et al.  Research Report: Richness Versus Parsimony in Modeling Technology Adoption Decisions - Understanding Merchant Adoption of a Smart Card-Based Payment System , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[10]  Caspar G. Chorus,et al.  How will automated vehicles shape users’ daily activities? Insights from focus groups with commuters in the Netherlands , 2019, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[11]  Li-Ta Hsu,et al.  A probabilistic model of pedestrian crossing behavior at signalized intersections for connected vehicles , 2016 .

[12]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[13]  Jin-Wei Wang,et al.  The role of environmental concern in the public acceptance of autonomous electric vehicles: A survey from China , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[14]  Travis Crayton,et al.  Autonomous Vehicles: Developing a Public Health Research Agenda to Frame the Future of Transportation Policy , 2017 .

[15]  Hannah Badland,et al.  Socio-ecological predictors of the uptake of cycling for recreation and transport in adults: results from the RESIDE study. , 2013, Preventive medicine.

[16]  Rosaria M Berliner,et al.  Who will be the early adopters of automated vehicles? Insights from a survey of electric vehicle owners in the United States , 2019, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[17]  Glen L. Urban,et al.  Lead User Analyses for the Development of New Industrial Products , 1988 .

[18]  F. Eves,et al.  Prediction of Specific Types of Physical Activity Using the Theory of Planned Behavior , 2007 .

[19]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[20]  Ricardo A. Daziano,et al.  Are Consumers Willing to Pay to Let Cars Drive for Them? Analyzing Response to Autonomous Vehicles , 2017 .

[21]  Nadia Adnan,et al.  How trust can drive forward the user acceptance to the technology? In-vehicle technology for autonomous vehicle , 2018, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[22]  R. A. Acheampong,et al.  Examining the determinants of utility bicycling using a socio-ecological framework: An exploratory study of the Tamale Metropolis in Northern Ghana , 2018 .

[23]  Larry Webber,et al.  A description of the social-ecological framework used in the trial of activity for adolescent girls (TAAG). , 2006, Health education research.

[24]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  Dynamic Ride-Sharing and Optimal Fleet Sizing for a System of Shared Autonomous Vehicles , 2015 .

[25]  Ricardo A. Daziano,et al.  Incorporating pro-environmental preferences towards green automobile technologies through a Bayesian hybrid choice model , 2013 .

[26]  Michael Hahsler,et al.  A REVIEW OF METHODS FOR MEASURING WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY , 2017 .

[27]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[28]  S. Haustein,et al.  Reduced use of environmentally friendly modes of transportation caused by perceived mobility necessities: An extension of the theory of planned behavior. , 2007 .

[29]  Juho Hamari,et al.  The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[30]  Taciano L. Milfont,et al.  The environmental attitudes inventory: A valid and reliable measure to assess the structure of environmental attitudes , 2010 .

[31]  J. Mattsson,et al.  Understanding current and future issues in collaborative consumption: A four-stage Delphi study , 2016 .

[32]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Choice of Travel Mode in the Theory of Planned Behavior: The Roles of Past Behavior, Habit, and Reasoned Action , 2003 .

[33]  Giana M. Eckhardt,et al.  Access-Based Consumption: The Case of Car Sharing , 2012 .

[34]  Hui Lin,et al.  Understanding Walking Behavior among University Students Using Theory of Planned Behavior , 2015, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[35]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[36]  Petter Næss,et al.  Built Environment, Causality and Travel , 2015 .

[37]  C. Ratti,et al.  The Impact of Autonomous Vehicles on Cities: A Review , 2018, Journal of Urban Technology.

[38]  A. Karvonen,et al.  Inside Smart Cities , 2018 .

[39]  Danilo Alves de Lima,et al.  Autonomous vehicles: scientometric and bibliometric review* , 2018, Transport Reviews.

[40]  Don MacKenzie,et al.  Help or hindrance? The travel, energy and carbon impacts of highly automated vehicles , 2016 .

[41]  Stephen Sutton,et al.  Eliciting salient beliefs in research on the theory of planned behaviour: The effect of question wording , 2003 .

[42]  S. Guhathakurta,et al.  Parking Spaces in the Age of Shared Autonomous Vehicles: How Much Parking Will We Need and Where? , 2017 .

[43]  Rachel Botsman,et al.  What's Mine Is Yours: The Rise of Collaborative Consumption , 2010 .

[44]  Todd Litman,et al.  Autonomous Vehicle Implementation Predictions: Implications for Transport Planning , 2015 .

[45]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Travel and the Built Environment , 2010 .

[46]  M. Sivak,et al.  Potential impact of self-driving vehicles on household vehicle demand and usage , 2015 .

[47]  M. Conner,et al.  The Theory of Planned Behaviour , 2004 .

[48]  K. Kockelman,et al.  Forecasting Americans' Long-Term Adoption of Connected and Autonomous Vehicle Technologies , 2016 .

[49]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[50]  D. McFadden.  Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[51]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  An application of a rank ordered probit modeling approach to understanding level of interest in autonomous vehicles , 2018, Transportation.

[52]  M. Sarstedt,et al.  A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling , 2015 .

[53]  J. Sallis,et al.  Ecological models of health behavior. , 2008 .

[54]  Anna R. Davies,et al.  Making visible: interrogating the performance of food sharing across 100 urban areas. , 2017 .

[55]  Bart van Arem,et al.  Policy and society related implications of automated driving: A review of literature and directions for future research , 2017, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[56]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  Assessing Public Opinions of and Interest in New Vehicle Technologies: An Austin Perspective , 2016 .

[57]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[58]  Yoram Shiftan,et al.  User preferences regarding autonomous vehicles , 2017 .

[59]  Mintesnot Woldeamanuel,et al.  Perceived benefits and concerns of autonomous vehicles: An exploratory study of millennials’ sentiments of an emerging market , 2018, Research in Transportation Economics.

[60]  Joel M. Cooper,et al.  Cognitive Underpinnings of Beliefs and Confidence in Beliefs about Fully Automated Vehicles , 2018 .

[61]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[62]  Reilly Jackson Umberger.  Who Will Be the First to Buy Autonomous Vehicles? An Application of Everett Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovations Theory , 2016 .

[63]  Stephen Sutton,et al.  The Importance of Affective Beliefs and Attitudes in the Theory of Planned Behavior: Predicting Intention to Increase Physical Activity , 2005 .

[64]  Felipe F. Dias,et al.  Modeling Individual Preferences for Ownership and Sharing of Autonomous Vehicle Technologies , 2017 .

[65]  Lisa Gansky,et al.  The Mesh: Why the Future of Business Is Sharing , 2010 .

[66]  John C. Berg.  Sharing Cities: A Case for Truly Smart and Sustainable Cities , 2017 .

[67]  M. Kroesen,et al.  The role of general and specific attitudes in predicting travel behavior – A fatal dilemma? , 2018 .

[68]  Yiman Du,et al.  Market Penetration Model for Autonomous Vehicles Based on Previous Technology Adoption Experiences , 2016 .

[69]  Riender Happee,et al.  Public opinion on automated driving: results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents , 2015 .