Abstract Morphosyntax in Two- and Three-Year-Old Children: Evidence from Priming

Young English-speaking children often omit auxiliary verbs from their speech, producing utterances such as baby crying alongside the more adult-like baby is crying. Studies have found that children's proficiency with auxiliary BE is correlated with frequency statistics in the input, leading some researchers to argue that children's auxiliary knowledge is item-specific and slow to develop. In a priming experiment, we investigated whether 2- and 3-year-old children represent auxiliary is and are as part of an abstract syntactic frame. We tested whether children could be primed to increase their auxiliary production when the prime and target differed by subject, verb and auxiliary type (is or are). We found these patterns of priming, indicating children represent auxiliary BE as part of an abstract syntactic frame that minimally contains is and are, despite the frequency-based effects reported in the literature.

[1]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[2]  T. Jaeger,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[3]  F. Pampel.  Logistic Regression: A Primer , 2000 .

[4]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  The persistence of structural priming: transient activation or implicit learning? , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[5]  Anna L. Theakston,et al.  Testing the abstractness of children's linguistic representations: lexical and structural priming of syntactic constructions in young children. , 2003, Developmental science.

[6]  Charles D. Yang,et al.  Morphosyntactic Learning and the Development of Tense , 2007 .

[7]  J G de Villiers,et al.  A cross-sectional study of the acquisition of grammatical morphemes in child speech. , 1973 .

[8]  Patricia Deevy,et al.  Production operations and the use of nonfinite verbs by children with specific language impairment. , 2002, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[9]  Paul Hagstrom,et al.  Partial Constraint Ordering in Child French Syntax , 2002 .

[10]  Anna L. Theakston,et al.  The acquisition of auxiliary syntax: a longitudinal elicitation study. Part 1: auxiliary BE. , 2009, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[11]  Laura Wagner,et al.  Children's Early Productivity with Verbal Morphology. , 2009 .

[12]  J. Huttenlocher,et al.  Syntactic priming in young children , 2004 .

[13]  Perla B. Gámez,et al.  Syntactic priming in 3- and 4-year-old children: evidence for abstract representations of transitive and dative forms. , 2007, Developmental psychology.

[14]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Linguistic Structure in Language Processing , 1988 .

[15]  H. Bergh,et al.  Examples of Mixed-Effects Modeling with Crossed Random Effects and with Binomial Data. , 2008 .

[16]  Stan A. Kuczaj,et al.  General developmental patterns and individual differences in the acquisition of copula and auxiliary be forms , 1986 .

[17]  Victor S. Ferreira,et al.  The persistence of optional complementizer production: Why saying “that” is not saying “that” at all , 2003 .

[18]  Andrew Radford,et al.  Syntactic Theory and the Acquisition of English Syntax: The Nature of Early Child Grammars of English , 1990 .

[19]  J. K. Bock.  Syntactic persistence in language production , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[20]  Andrew Radford,et al.  Towards a Structure-Building Model of Acquisition , 1996 .

[21]  Laurence B. Leonard,et al.  Production Operations Contribute to the Grammatical Morpheme Limitations of Children with Specific Language Impairment , 2000 .

[22]  K. Wexler,et al.  Verb movement: Finiteness and head movement in early child grammars , 1994 .

[23]  Roger W. Brown,et al.  A First Language: The Early Stages , 1974 .

[24]  M. Pickering,et al.  Structural priming: a critical review. , 2008, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  Alan Agresti,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis , 1991, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[26]  Anna L Theakston,et al.  The influence of discourse context on children's provision of auxiliary BE* , 2008, Journal of Child Language.

[27]  Mary Target,et al.  Society for Research in Child Development , 1997 .

[28]  M. Pickering,et al.  The Representation of Verbs: Evidence from Syntactic Priming in Language Production , 1998 .

[29]  Cynthia Fisher,et al.  The role of abstract syntactic knowledge in language acquisition: a reply to Tomasello (2000) , 2002, Cognition.

[30]  L. Hedges,et al.  Introduction to Meta‐Analysis , 2009, International Coaching Psychology Review.

[31]  Virginia Valian.  Young Children's Understanding of Present and Past Tense , 2006 .

[32]  M. Rispoli,et al.  The growth of tense productivity. , 2009, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[33]  Gary S. Dell,et al.  A Synthesis of Some Recent Work in Sentence Production , 1989 .

[34]  Stephen Wilson.  Lexically specific constructions in the acquisition of inflection in English , 2003, Journal of Child Language.

[35]  K. Wexler.  Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: a new explanation of the optional infinitive stage: a new explanation of the optional infinitive stage , 1998 .

[36]  Graham K. Rand,et al.  Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences , 1983 .

[37]  Harald Clahsen,et al.  Generative perspectives on language acquisition : empirical findings, theoretical considerations, and crosslinguistic comparisons , 1996 .

[38]  M L Rice,et al.  Tense over time: the longitudinal course of tense acquisition in children with specific language impairment. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[39]  Holly P. Branigan,et al.  Evidence for (shared) abstract structure underlying children’s short and full passives , 2011, Cognition.

[40]  Virginia Valian,et al.  Abstract sentence representations in 3-year-olds: Evidence from language production and comprehension , 2008 .

[41]  L. Wagner.  Aspectual influences on early tense comprehension , 2001, Journal of Child Language.

[42]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Language production : Grammatical encoding , 1994 .

[43]  G. Dell,et al.  Persistent structural priming from language comprehension to language production , 2007, Cognition.

[44]  J. Snedeker,et al.  Syntactic priming during language comprehension in three- and four-year-old children , 2008 .

[45]  Robert Dondero.  Princeton University , 2001 .

[46]  Anna L. Theakston,et al.  The acquisition of auxiliary syntax: BE and HAVE , 2005 .

[47]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Closed-class immanence in sentence production , 1989, Cognition.

[48]  Ling-Yu Guo,et al.  Effect of subject types on the production of auxiliary is in young English-speaking children. , 2010, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[49]  Anna L. Theakston,et al.  The acquisition of auxiliaries BE and HAVE: an elicitation study* , 2005, Journal of Child Language.