Thermodynamic pathways to genome spatial organization in the cell nucleus.

The architecture of the eukaryotic genome is characterized by a high degree of spatial organization. Chromosomes occupy preferred territories correlated to their state of activity and, yet, displace their genes to interact with remote sites in complex patterns requiring the orchestration of a huge number of DNA loci and molecular regulators. Far from random, this organization serves crucial functional purposes, but its governing principles remain elusive. By computer simulations of a statistical mechanics model, we show how architectural patterns spontaneously arise from the physical interaction between soluble binding molecules and chromosomes via collective thermodynamics mechanisms. Chromosomes colocalize, loops and territories form, and find their relative positions as stable thermodynamic states. These are selected by thermodynamic switches, which are regulated by concentrations/affinity of soluble mediators and by number/location of their attachment sites along chromosomes. Our thermodynamic switch model of nuclear architecture, thus, explains on quantitative grounds how well-known cell strategies of upregulation of DNA binding proteins or modification of chromatin structure can dynamically shape the organization of the nucleus.

[1]  H. Stanley,et al.  Introduction to Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena , 1972 .

[2]  F. Grosveld,et al.  The active spatial organization of the beta-globin locus requires the transcription factor EKLF. , 2004, Genes & development.

[3]  M. Gabut,et al.  Inheritance of Polycomb-dependent chromosomal interactions in Drosophila. , 2003, Genes & development.

[4]  W. D. Laat,et al.  An evaluation of 3C-based methods to capture DNA interactions , 2007, Nature Methods.

[5]  J. Locke,et al.  Dosage-dependent modifiers of position effect variegation in Drosophila and a mass action model that explains their effect. , 1988, Genetics.

[6]  Anne E Carpenter,et al.  Long-Range Directional Movement of an Interphase Chromosome Site , 2006, Current Biology.

[7]  B. Panning,et al.  A Thermodynamic Switch for Chromosome Colocalization , 2008, Genetics.

[8]  T. Hwa,et al.  Physical constraints and functional characteristics of transcription factor–DNA interaction , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  R. Hancock.  Packing of the polynucleosome chain in interphase chromosomes: evidence for a contribution of crowding and entropic forces. , 2007, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[10]  Davide Marenduzzo,et al.  What are the molecular ties that maintain genomic loops? , 2007, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[11]  Jeannie T. Lee,et al.  Evidence that homologous X-chromosome pairing requires transcription and Ctcf protein , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[12]  T Misteli,et al.  Protein dynamics: implications for nuclear architecture and gene expression. , 2001, Science.

[13]  T. Cremer,et al.  Dynamic genome architecture in the nuclear space: regulation of gene expression in three dimensions , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[14]  Florence Hediger,et al.  Heterochromatin protein 1: don't judge the book by its cover! , 2006, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[15]  R Eils,et al.  Compartmentalization of interphase chromosomes observed in simulation and experiment. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  B. Trask,et al.  Evidence for the organization of chromatin in megabase pair-sized loops arranged along a random walk path in the human G0/G1 interphase nucleus , 1995, The Journal of cell biology.

[17]  D. Baker,et al.  Protein–DNA binding specificity predictions with structural models , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[18]  Cameron S. Osborne,et al.  Active genes dynamically colocalize to shared sites of ongoing transcription , 2004, Nature Genetics.

[19]  Frank Grosveld,et al.  Spatial organization of gene expression: the active chromatin hub , 2003, Chromosome Research.

[20]  Christian Münkel,et al.  Chromosome structure predicted by a polymer model , 1998 .

[21]  W. D. Laat,et al.  Long-range DNA contacts: romance in the nucleus? , 2007 .

[22]  G. Fredrickson.  The theory of polymer dynamics , 1996 .

[23]  T. Misteli.  Beyond the Sequence: Cellular Organization of Genome Function , 2011 .

[24]  Mario Nicodemi,et al.  Self-Assembly and DNA Binding of the Blocking Factor in X Chromosome Inactivation , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[25]  M. Groudine,et al.  Proximity among distant regulatory elements at the beta-globin locus requires GATA-1 and FOG-1. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[26]  R. Hancock,et al.  A role for macromolecular crowding effects in the assembly and function of compartments in the nucleus. , 2004, Journal of structural biology.

[27]  Michael Lässig,et al.  From biophysics to evolutionary genetics: statistical aspects of gene regulation , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.

[28]  Dieter W Heermann,et al.  Random loop model for long polymers. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[29]  Richard A Flavell,et al.  Long-range intrachromosomal interactions in the T helper type 2 cytokine locus , 2004, Nature Immunology.

[30]  D. Marenduzzo,et al.  Modeling a self-avoiding chromatin loop: relation to the packing problem, action-at-a-distance, and nuclear context. , 2006, Structure.

[31]  Thomas Cremer,et al.  Chromosome territories--a functional nuclear landscape. , 2006, Current opinion in cell biology.

[32]  Mario Nicodemi,et al.  Mechanics and Dynamics of X-Chromosome Pairing at X Inactivation , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[33]  Hui Ling Chen,et al.  CTCF Mediates Interchromosomal Colocalization Between Igf2/H19 and Wsb1/Nf1 , 2006, Science.

[34]  Rolf Ohlsson,et al.  CTCF binding at the H19 imprinting control region mediates maternally inherited higher-order chromatin conformation to restrict enhancer access to Igf2. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  K. Binder,et al.  Monte Carlo Simulation in Statistical Physics , 1992, Graduate Texts in Physics.

[36]  A. Pombo,et al.  Intermingling of Chromosome Territories in Interphase Suggests Role in Translocations and Transcription-Dependent Associations , 2006, PLoS biology.

[37]  Richard Axel,et al.  Interchromosomal Interactions and Olfactory Receptor Choice , 2006, Cell.

[38]  Helmut Schiessel,et al.  Nucleosome interactions in chromatin: fiber stiffening and hairpin formation. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[39]  Johannes Berg,et al.  Dynamics of gene expression and the regulatory inference problem , 2007, 0712.3791.

[40]  Tom Misteli,et al.  Cell biology: Chromosome territories , 2007, Nature.

[41]  Jeannie T. Lee,et al.  Identification of a Ctcf cofactor, Yy1, for the X chromosome binary switch. , 2007, Molecular cell.

[42]  Sunita Singh,et al.  PDZ domain-mediated dimerization and homeodomain-directed specificity are required for high-affinity DNA binding by SATB1 , 2008, Nucleic acids research.

[43]  C Cremer,et al.  Radial arrangement of chromosome territories in human cell nuclei: a computer model approach based on gene density indicates a probabilistic global positioning code. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[44]  K. Sandhu,et al.  Circular chromosome conformation capture (4C) uncovers extensive networks of epigenetically regulated intra- and interchromosomal interactions , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[45]  Davide Marenduzzo,et al.  Entropy-driven genome organization. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[46]  G. Blobel,et al.  Exchange of GATA factors mediates transitions in looped chromatin organization at a developmentally regulated gene locus. , 2008, Molecular cell.

[47]  M. Nicodemi,et al.  Symmetry-breaking model for X-chromosome inactivation. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[48]  S. Quake,et al.  A Systems Approach to Measuring the Binding Energy Landscapes of Transcription Factors , 2007, Science.

[49]  S. Galande,et al.  The third dimension of gene regulation: organization of dynamic chromatin loopscape by SATB1. , 2007, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[50]  Matthias Merkenschlager,et al.  Association of Transcriptionally Silent Genes with Ikaros Complexes at Centromeric Heterochromatin , 1997, Cell.

[51]  S. Gasser,et al.  The nuclear envelope and transcriptional control , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[52]  J. Gall,et al.  Cajal bodies, nucleoli, and speckles in the Xenopus oocyte nucleus have a low-density, sponge-like structure. , 2004, Molecular biology of the cell.

[53]  P. Fraser,et al.  Nuclear organization of the genome and the potential for gene regulation , 2007, Nature.

[54]  B. Panning,et al.  The colocalization transition of homologous chromosomes at meiosis. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[55]  Kurt Binder,et al.  Applications of Monte Carlo methods to statistical physics , 1997 .

[56]  J. Workman,et al.  The heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) family: put away a bias toward HP1. , 2008, Molecules and cells.

[57]  T. Cremer,et al.  Chromosome territories. , 2010, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[58]  Prabhakar R. Gudla,et al.  Allele-specific nuclear positioning of the monoallelically expressed astrocyte marker GFAP. , 2008, Genes & development.

[59]  G van den Engh,et al.  A random-walk/giant-loop model for interphase chromosomes. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[60]  Peter R. Cook,et al.  Predicting three-dimensional genome structure from transcriptional activity , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[61]  Bing Ren,et al.  Genome-wide mapping of allele-specific protein-DNA interactions in human cells , 2008, Nature Methods.

[62]  Cameron S. Osborne,et al.  Replication and transcription: Shaping the landscape of the genome , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[63]  C. Massie,et al.  ChIPping away at gene regulation , 2008, EMBO reports.