Automatic segmentation of different-sized white matter lesions by voxel probability estimation

A new method for fully automated segmentation of white matter lesions (WMLs) on cranial MR imaging is presented. The algorithm uses five types of regular MRI-scans. It is based on a K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) classification technique, which builds a feature space from voxel intensity features and spatial information. The technique generates images representing the probability per voxel being part of a WML. By application of thresholds on these probability maps binary segmentations can be produced. ROC-curves show that the segmentations achieve a high sensitivity and specificity. Three similarity measures, the similarity index (SI), the overlap fraction (OF) and the extra fraction (EF), are calculated for evaluation of the results and determination of the optimal threshold on the probability map. Investigation of the relation between the total lesion volume and the similarity measures shows that the method performs well for lesions larger than 2 cc. The maximum SI per patient is correlated to the total WML volume. No significant relation between the lesion volume and the optimal threshold has been observed. The probabilistic equivalents of the SI, OF en EF (PSI, POF and PEF) allow direct evaluation of the probability maps, which provides a strong tool for comparison of different classification results. A significant correlation between the lesion volume and the PSI and the PEF has been noticed. This method for automated WML segmentation is applicable to lesions of different sizes and shapes, and reaches an accuracy that is comparable to existing methods for multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation. Furthermore, it is suitable for detection of WMLs in large and longitudinal population studies.

[1]  C. Jack,et al.  FLAIR histogram segmentation for measurement of leukoaraiosis volume , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[2]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  Adaptive, template moderated, spatially varying statistical classification , 2000, Medical Image Anal..

[3]  L. R. Dice Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between Species , 1945 .

[4]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Automatic Morphology-Based Brain Segmentation (MBRASE) from MRI-T1 Data , 2000, NeuroImage.

[5]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  Benoit M. Dawant,et al.  Morphometric analysis of white matter lesions in MR images: method and validation , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[7]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Automated White Matter Lesion Segmentation by Voxel Probability Estimation , 2003, MICCAI.

[8]  H Azhari,et al.  Automated detection and characterization of multiple sclerosis lesions in brain MR images. , 1998, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[9]  J. Bartko Measurement and reliability: statistical thinking considerations. , 1991, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[10]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Automatic Generation of Training Data for Brain Tissue Classification from MRI , 2002, MICCAI.

[11]  Matthijs Oudkerk,et al.  Cerebral white matter lesions and cognitive function: the Rotterdam Scan Study. , 2000 .

[12]  R Kikinis,et al.  Automatic identification of gray matter structures from MRI to improve the segmentation of white matter lesions. , 1995, Journal of image guided surgery.

[13]  K. Zou,et al.  Quantitative analysis of MRI signal abnormalities of brain white matter with high reproducibility and accuracy , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  Adaptive Segmentation of MRI Data , 1995, CVRMed.

[15]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multi-modality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1996, Proceedings of the Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis.

[16]  L. Fried,et al.  Clinical correlates of white matter findings on cranial magnetic resonance imaging of 3301 elderly people. The Cardiovascular Health Study. , 1996, Stroke.

[17]  Koenraad Van Leemput,et al.  Automated segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions by model outlier detection , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Automatic "pipeline" analysis of 3-D MRI data for clinical trials: application to multiple sclerosis , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  S Vinitski,et al.  Increased differentiation of intracranial white matter lesions by multispectral 3D-tissue segmentation: preliminary results. , 2001, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[20]  Koenraad Van Leemput,et al.  Automated model-based bias field correction of MR images of the brain , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[21]  L G Nyúl,et al.  On standardizing the MR image intensity scale , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  Bruno Alfano,et al.  Automated segmentation and measurement of global white matter lesion volume in patients with multiple sclerosis , 2000 .

[23]  Koen L. Vincken,et al.  Probabilistic segmentation of white matter lesions in MR imaging , 2004, NeuroImage.

[24]  A. Hofman,et al.  Cerebral white matter lesions and depressive symptoms in elderly adults. , 2000, Archives of general psychiatry.

[25]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .

[26]  Koenraad Van Leemput,et al.  Automated model-based tissue classification of MR images of the brain , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[27]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  New variants of a method of MRI scale standardization , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[28]  D. Briley,et al.  Does leukoaraiosis predict morbidity and mortality? , 2000, Neurology.

[29]  R. Killiany,et al.  Quantitative follow‐up of patients with multiple sclerosis using MRI: Reproducibility , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[30]  Christopher M. Bishop,et al.  Neural networks for pattern recognition , 1995 .

[31]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Model-based 3-D segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions in magnetic resonance brain images , 1995, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.