Dual use of PZT patches as sensors in global dynamic and local electromechanical impedance techniques for structural health monitoring

In this article, a new approach is proposed to effectively detect the initiation and progression of structural damage by combining the global dynamic and the local electromechanical impedance (EMI) techniques, using the same set of surface-bonded piezoelectric ceramic (PZT) patches as sensors. The PZT patches are used to determine the natural frequencies and the strain mode shapes of the structure (for use in the global dynamic technique) as well as to acquire the electromechanical admittance signature (for use in the EMI technique) to facilitate an improved damage assessment. Occurrence and location of the incipient damage are determined using the EMI technique, whereas for moderate to severe damages, the location and the severity are arrived at through the global dynamic technique. Finally, damage severity is determined in terms of the original stiffness of structure using the strain mode shapes directly determined using the PZT patches. The proposed technique is illustrated using two specimens—a 4-m long steel beam and a mild steel plate 1260 mm × 630 mm × 6.5 mm in size. The integrated approach provides greater information about damage, is simple to apply, does not involve any numerical/analytical modeling a priori, and is at the same time very cost effective.

[1]  Craig A. Rogers,et al.  Automated real-time structure health monitoring via signature pattern recognition , 1995, Smart Structures.

[2]  Ahmet E. Aktan,et al.  Limitations in Structural Identification of Large Constructed Structures , 2007 .

[3]  Suresh Bhalla,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring by Piezo–Impedance Transducers. II: Applications , 2004 .

[4]  T. Ikeda Fundamentals of piezoelectricity , 1990 .

[5]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  IMPEDANCE-BASED HEALTH MONITORING OF CIVIL STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS , 2000 .

[6]  Suresh Bhalla,et al.  Structural impedance based damage diagnosis by piezo‐transducers , 2003 .

[7]  Zhengjie Zhou,et al.  Vibration-based detection of small-scale damage on a bridge deck , 2007 .

[8]  Piotr Omenzetter,et al.  Assessment of highway bridge upgrading by dynamic testing and finite element model updating , 2003 .

[9]  Craig A. Rogers,et al.  Coupled Electro-Mechanical Analysis of Adaptive Material Systems — Determination of the Actuator Power Consumption and System Energy Transfer , 1994 .

[10]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  An Integrated Health Monitoring Technique Using Structural Impedance Sensors , 2000 .

[11]  Chee Kiong Soh,et al.  Electromechanical Impedance Modeling for Adhesively Bonded Piezo-Transducers , 2004 .

[12]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  FIELD VERIFICATION OF A NONDESTRUCTIVE DAMAGE LOCALIZATION AND SEVERITY ESTIMATION ALGORITHM , 2002 .

[13]  Ahmet E. Aktan,et al.  Issues in health monitoring for intelligent infrastructure , 1998 .

[14]  Mahboub Baccouch,et al.  Modal identification and model updating of a reinforced concrete bridge , 2005 .

[15]  Victor Giurgiutiu,et al.  Embedded Self-Sensing Piezoelectric Active Sensors for On-Line Structural Identification , 2002 .

[16]  Suresh Bhalla,et al.  Performance of smart piezoceramic patches in health monitoring of a RC bridge , 2000 .

[17]  Akshay Surendra Kumar Naidu. Structural damage identification with admittance signatures of smart PZT transducers , 2004 .

[18]  D. Zimmerman,et al.  Structural damage detection using a minimum rank update theory , 1994 .

[19]  A. K. Pandey,et al.  Damage Detection in Structures Using Changes in Flexibility , 1994 .

[20]  Suresh Bhalla,et al.  Ultra Low-cost Adaptations of Electro-mechanical Impedance Technique for Structural Health Monitoring , 2009 .

[21]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Comparative study of damage identification algorithms applied to a bridge: I. Experiment , 1998 .

[22]  Suresh Bhalla,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring by Piezo-Impedance Transducers. I: Modeling , 2004 .