An Efficient Method for Evaluating Analog Circuit Performance Bounds Under Process Variations

The continued scaling of the minimum feature size of contemporary chips has made circuit performance increasingly susceptible to the process variations. Many approaches have been proposed to estimate the circuit performance bounds with respect to process or circuit parameter variations in the recent years. The Monte Carlo method is the most popular one among them. However, this method usually produces underestimated results and needs a large number of simulation runs to achieve an accurate estimation. The approach based on Kharitonov's method has been recently proposed. This method requires all coefficient variations in the system transfer function to be independent from each other. Unfortunately, most real circuits do not satisfy this constraint. Therefore, it tends to overestimate the performance bounds in real application due to the parameter-independent requirement. This short paper proposes an optimization approach on a transfer function of a linear circuit to evaluate the performance bounds under process variations. The magnitude and phase bounds of a linear system can be calculated by the proposed method at each frequency point. Furthermore, the parameter-independent requirement in Kharitonov's method is resolved by the proposed method. The proposed method has been applied to a CMOS two-stage amplifier. The experimental result shows that it evaluates the magnitude and phase bounds of a linear system accurately in much less computation time as compared with the Monte Carlo method. All experimental results were carried out using a standard 0.35-μm CMOS process technology.

[1]  Jorge J. Moré,et al.  Computing a Trust Region Step , 1983 .

[2]  Richard H. Byrd,et al.  Approximate solution of the trust region problem by minimization over two-dimensional subspaces , 1988, Math. Program..

[3]  E. Sanchez-Sinencio,et al.  Single Miller capacitor frequency compensation technique for low-power multistage amplifiers , 2005, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.

[4]  Hao Yu,et al.  Stochastic analog circuit behavior modeling by point estimation method , 2011, ISPD '11.

[5]  Sung-Mo Kang,et al.  Worst-case analysis and optimization of VLSI circuit performances , 1995, IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst..

[6]  J. Hammersley SIMULATION AND THE MONTE CARLO METHOD , 1982 .

[7]  M. W. Tian,et al.  Worst case tolerance analysis of linear analog circuits using sensitivity bands , 2000 .

[8]  C.-J. Richard Shi,et al.  Simulation and sensitivity of linear analog circuits under parameter variations by Robust interval analysis , 1999, TODE.

[9]  Xuan Zeng,et al.  Worst case analysis of linear analog circuit performance based on Kharitonov's rectangle , 2010, 2010 10th IEEE International Conference on Solid-State and Integrated Circuit Technology.

[10]  Dian Zhou,et al.  A novel approach to estimate the impact of analog circuit performance based on the small signal model under process variations , 2011, 2011 IEEE International SOC Conference.

[11]  T. Steihaug The Conjugate Gradient Method and Trust Regions in Large Scale Optimization , 1983 .

[12]  Hoi Lee,et al.  Active-feedback frequency-compensation technique for low-power multistage amplifiers , 2003, IEEE J. Solid State Circuits.

[13]  Yiyu Shi,et al.  QuickYield: An efficient global-search based parametric yield estimation with performance constraints , 2010, Design Automation Conference.

[14]  Thomas F. Coleman,et al.  A Subspace, Interior, and Conjugate Gradient Method for Large-Scale Bound-Constrained Minimization Problems , 1999, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[15]  A. Werthof,et al.  Direct parameter extraction method for deep submicrometer metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor small signal equivalent circuit , 2009 .