The College of Paramedics (British Paramedic Association) position paper regarding the Joint Royal Colleges Ambulance Liaison Committee recommendations on paramedic intubation

This paper is the College of Paramedics (CoP) Council's response to the Airway Working Group's report of June 2008,1 and the Joint Royal Colleges Ambulance Liaison Committee (JRCALC)'s recommendations (based on the report) in a letter of July 2008.2 ### Evidence A major concern for the CoP is how the conclusions of the Airway Group were reached. For many years the NHS has promoted an evidence-based approach to clinical practice for all professional groups. The JRCALC Airway Group has formed a consensus based on selected literature. Importantly, this was not a formal systematic review and no formal critical appraisal of the papers selected was completed. Furthermore, the papers are only a fraction of the evidence about prehospital intubation. Of 68 references, only 26 relate directly to paramedic intubation: a simple PubMed search (using ‘paramedic’ and ‘intubation’) produces more than 400 papers. As such, the proposals are based on expert opinion rather than robust evidence. Expert consensus is not always sufficiently robust to support a major change in clinical practice as it is at the bottom of the hierarchies of evidence. However, if the ‘consensus’ of a group of experts is not achieved in accordance with a structured method (such as a Delphi technique), it is not sound enough to appear in most hierarchies of evidence. No such technique was used by the Airway Working Group. These weaknesses were explicitly recognised by its members at the conclusion of their first meeting, and thus there was a unanimous vote by those present to conduct a systematic review of the evidence concerning prehospital intubation to ensure that the group's recommendations were based on robust evidence. The group also recognised that only a very small minority of the evidence reviewed addressed UK paramedic practice (one paper), and that significant differences in the training programmes …

[1]  E. von Elm,et al.  Pre-hospital tracheal intubation in patients with traumatic brain injury: systematic review of current evidence. , 2009, British journal of anaesthesia.

[2]  J. Laffey,et al.  Evaluation of the Airtraq® and Macintosh laryngoscopes in patients at increased risk for difficult tracheal intubation* , 2008, Anaesthesia.

[3]  P. Myles,et al.  Paramedic Tracheal Intubation Using the Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway , 2008, Prehospital emergency care : official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the National Association of State EMS Directors.

[4]  M. Woollard,et al.  Airtraq vs standard laryngoscopy by student paramedics and experienced prehospital laryngoscopists managing a model of difficult intubation * , 2007, Anaesthesia.

[5]  M. Woollard,et al.  Use of the Airtraq laryngoscope in a model of difficult intubation by prehospital providers not previously trained in laryngoscopy , 2007, Anaesthesia.

[6]  Saba Sarwar,et al.  National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death , 2007 .

[7]  F. Semjen,et al.  Pressure‐controlled ventilation is superior to volume‐controlled ventilation with a laryngeal mask airway in children , 2007, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[8]  B. Harte,et al.  Learning and performance of tracheal intubation by novice personnel: a comparison of the Airtraq® and Macintosh laryngoscope , 2006, Anaesthesia.

[9]  Y. Chan,et al.  Comparison of the Re-usable LMA Classic™ and Two Single-use Laryngeal Masks (LMA Unique™ and SoftSeal™) in Airway Management by Novice Personnel , 2005, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care.

[10]  R. E. Hall,et al.  Human patient simulation is effective for teaching paramedic students endotracheal intubation. , 2005, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[11]  M. Woollard,et al.  Prehospital airway management in Ambulance Services in the United Kingdom * , 2004, Anaesthesia.

[12]  D. Davis,et al.  The impact of hypoxia and hyperventilation on outcome after paramedic rapid sequence intubation of severely head-injured patients. , 2004, The Journal of trauma.

[13]  M. Schurr,et al.  Prehospital Hyperventilation After Brain Injury: A Prospective Analysis of Prehospital and Early Hospital Hyperventilation of the Brain-Injured Patient , 2003, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine.

[14]  J. Falk,et al.  Misplaced endotracheal tubes by paramedics in an urban emergency medical services system. , 2001, Annals of emergency medicine.