Warm Season Satellite Precipitation Biases for Different Cloud Types Over Western North Pacific

Two along-track (level 2) satellite precipitation retrievals by the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Microwave Imager (GMI) and the Dual Frequency Precipitation Radar Ku-band (DPR-Ku) and two multisatellite precipitation products, global satellite mapping of precipitation (GSMaP) and Integrated Multisatellite Retrievals for GPM (IMERG), are intercompared for different cloud types during warm season over the western North Pacific region. It is found that the biases of the precipitation measurements are systematically associated with cloud types. The best agreements of passive microwave (PMW) products and infrared-based (IR) products with satellite radar-based estimates are found for a relatively weak precipitation range for mid-low clouds (except over land) and high clouds, while similar agreement is found for heavier precipitation range for deep convection regardless of surface type. Precipitation from mid-low clouds over land is considerably underestimated by PMW and IR products over almost the entire intensity range. The IR-based precipitation estimates for deep convective clouds considerably overestimate the intensity for both weak precipitation and cases where precipitation was not detected by the DPR-Ku algorithm. The findings reveal the characteristics of the biases of the products depend on the associated cloud types, which suggests consideration of the cloud type information to improve satellite-based precipitation estimates.

[1]  Ali Tokay,et al.  A Novel Approach to Identify Sources of Errors in IMERG for GPM Ground Validation , 2016 .

[2]  Christian D. Kummerow,et al.  The Evolution of the Goddard Profiling Algorithm to a Fully Parametric Scheme , 2015 .

[3]  S. Kanae,et al.  Climatological characteristics of fronts in the western North Pacific based on surface weather charts , 2014 .

[4]  A. Hou,et al.  The Global Precipitation Measurement Mission , 2014 .

[5]  Taikan Oki,et al.  Role of rivers in the seasonal variations of terrestrial water storage over global basins , 2009 .

[6]  Z. Kawasaki,et al.  A Kalman Filter Approach to the Global Satellite Mapping of Precipitation (GSMaP) from Combined Passive Microwave and Infrared Radiometric Data , 2009 .

[7]  Kenneth Sassen,et al.  Classifying clouds around the globe with the CloudSat radar: 1‐year of results , 2008 .

[8]  G. Huffman,et al.  Real‐time global flood estimation using satellite‐based precipitation and a coupled land surface and routing model , 2014 .

[9]  Christian D. Kummerow,et al.  Rainfall Climate Regimes: The Relationship of Regional TRMM Rainfall Biases to the Environment , 2006 .

[10]  S. Kanae,et al.  Relative contributions of weather systems to mean and extreme global precipitation , 2017 .

[11]  F. Joseph Turk,et al.  Requirements for a robust precipitation constellation , 2016, 2016 14th Specialist Meeting on Microwave Radiometry and Remote Sensing of the Environment (MicroRad).

[12]  David S. Henderson,et al.  Sensitivity of Rain-Rate Estimates Related to Convective Organization: Observations from the Kwajalein, RMI, Radar , 2017 .

[13]  Christian D. Kummerow,et al.  Understanding the Sources of Satellite Passive Microwave Rainfall Retrieval Systematic Errors Over Land , 2017 .

[14]  Toshio Iguchi,et al.  GPM/DPR Level-2 Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document , 2010 .

[15]  Shupeng Zhang,et al.  Evaluation of Global Satellite Mapping of Precipitation Project Daily Precipitation Estimates over the Chinese Mainland , 2016 .