Cross-language speech perception: Initial capabilities and developmental change.

This article reports three studies designed to increase our understanding of developmental changes in cross-language speech perception. In the first study, we compared adult speakers of English and Hindi on their ability to discriminate pairings from a synthetic voiced, unaspirated place-of-articulation continuum. Results indicated that English listeners discriminate two categories (ba vs. (Ja), whereas Hindi listeners discriminate three (ba vs. da, and da vs. Da). We then used stimuli from within this continuum in the next two experiments to determine (a) if our previously reported finding (Werker & Tees, 1984a) of a reorganization between 6 and 12 months of life from "universal" to "language-specific" phonetic perception would be evident using synthetic (rather than natural) stimuli in which the physical variability within and between categories could be controlled, and (b) whether the younger infants' sensitivity to nonnative speech contrasts is best explained by reference to the phonetic relevance or the physical similarity of the stimuli. In addition to replicating the developmental reorganization, the results indicate that infant speech perception is phonetically relevant. We discuss the implications of these results. Since the early 1970s researchers have been studying infant speech perception, partly in an attempt to determine if there is evidence for a specialized phonetic mode of processing among infants. In a now-classic study, Eimas, Siqueland, Jusczyk, and Vigorito (1971) demonstrated that English-learning infants aged 1 to 4 months show far better discrimination along a synthetic voice onset time (VOT) continuum for two stimuli that straddle the adult /ba/-/pa/ phonetic category boundary than they do for two equally acoustically distinct stimuli from within the same phonetic category. This differential discrimination at some, rather than other, points along a single synthetic contin

[1]  P. D. Eimas,et al.  Speech Perception in Infants , 1971, Science.

[2]  D. Jamieson,et al.  Training non-native speech contrasts in adults: Acquisition of the English /ð/-/θ/ contrast by francophones , 1986 .

[3]  D B Pisoni,et al.  Discrimination of voice onset time by human infants: new findings and implications for the effects of early experience. , 1981, Child development.

[4]  L. Streeter Language perception of 2-month-old infants shows effects of both innate mechanisms and experience , 1976, Nature.

[5]  N. Macmillan,et al.  The psychophysics of categorical perception. , 1977, Psychological review.

[6]  R. Lasky,et al.  VOT discrimination by four to six and a half month old infants from Spanish environments. , 1975, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[7]  Barbara A. Younger,et al.  How Infants form Categories , 1985 .

[8]  J. Mehler,et al.  Neonate Cognition: Beyond the Blooming Buzzing Confusion , 1985 .

[9]  N. Smelser,et al.  Behavioral and social science : fifty years of discovery : in commemoration of the fiftieth anniversary of the "Ogburn report," Recent social trends in the United States , 1986 .

[10]  J. Hillenbrand Perceptual organization of speech sounds by infants. , 1983, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[11]  A M Liberman,et al.  Perception of the speech code. , 1967, Psychological review.

[12]  D B Pisoni,et al.  Some effects of laboratory training on identification and discrimination of voicing contrasts in stop consonants. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  Catherine T. Best,et al.  Categorical perception of English /r/ and /l/ by Japanese bilinguals , 1981, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[14]  J. Werker,et al.  Developmental changes across childhood in the perception of non-native speech sounds. , 1983, Canadian journal of psychology.

[15]  Kenneth N. Stevens,et al.  Quantal Aspects of Consonant Production and Perception: A Study of Retroflex Stop Consonants. , 1975 .

[16]  D. Brooks,et al.  Otitis Media and Child Development , 1979, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[17]  P. Kuhl,et al.  Enhanced discriminability at the phonetic boundaries for the place feature in macaques. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  J. Werker,et al.  Developmental aspects of cross-language speech perception. , 1981, Child development.

[19]  P. Kuhl Perception of auditory equivalence classes for speech in early infancy , 1983 .

[20]  A. Liberman On Finding That Speech Is Special , 1982 .

[21]  J. Werker,et al.  Phonemic and phonetic factors in adult cross-language speech perception. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  J. Fodor The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[23]  D. Burnham,et al.  Developmental loss of speech perception: Exposure to and experience with a first language , 1986, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[24]  A. Liberman,et al.  Speech perception takes precedence over nonspeech perception. , 1987, Science.

[25]  P. L. Harris Infant perception: From sensation to cognition L.B. Cohen & P. Salapatek. Academic Press, New York (1975). Vol. 1, 438 pp., £11.25 and Vol. 2, 256 pp., £8.75 , 1976, Neuroscience.

[26]  J Hillenbrand,et al.  Differential use of temporal cues to the /s/-/z/ contrast by native and non-native speakers of English. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  J S Logan,et al.  Cross-language evidence for three factors in speech perception , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  S. Trehub The Discrimination of Foreign Speech Contrasts by Infants and Adults. , 1976 .

[29]  J. Werker,et al.  Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life , 1984 .

[30]  J. Osofsky Handbook of infant development , 1979 .

[31]  P. D. Eimas,et al.  Studies on the categorization of speech by infants , 1983, Cognition.

[32]  L. Polka Perception of Persian uvular and velar stop consonants by speakers of American English , 1987 .

[33]  D. Pisoni On the perception of speech sounds as biologically significant signals. , 1979, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[34]  C. Best,et al.  Examination of perceptual reorganization for nonnative speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  D B Pisoni,et al.  Discimination of relative onset time of two-component tones by infants. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  A. Liberman,et al.  The motor theory of speech perception revised , 1985, Cognition.

[37]  P. Kuhl Speech perception in early infancy: perceptual constancy for spectrally dissimilar vowel categories. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  J. D. Miller,et al.  Speech perception by the chinchilla: voiced-voiceless distinction in alveolar plosive consonants , 1975, Science.

[39]  J. Flege,et al.  THE EFFECT OF LINGUISTIC EXPERIENCE ON ARABS’ PERCEPTION OF THE ENGLISH /s/ vs. /z/ CONTRAST , 1984 .

[40]  Peter D. Eimas,et al.  Auditory and linguistic processing of cues for place of articulation by infants , 1974 .

[41]  R E Eilers,et al.  Linguistic experience and phonemic perception in infancy: a crosslinguistic study. , 1979, Child development.