Effects of warned and unwarned demand transitions on vigilance performance and stress

Abstract The present study was designed to explore the effects of warned and unwarned demand transitions in vigilance on performance and self-reported stress. Twenty observers (10 women and 10 men) were assigned at random to each of six conditions resulting from the factorial combination of signal salience (high and low salience signals) and switching (no switch, switch with warning, and switch without warning). Performance metrics and self-reported stress state (Task Engagement, Distress, and Worry) were collected. While demand transitions did destabilize subsequent performance, increasing intra-individual variability, overall performance efficiency was uninfluenced by either switching or warning. Demand transitions, whether warned or not, increased self-reported distress. A dynamic model of performance stress may be necessary and research employing vigilance tasks in the future may be useful for developing this performance-stress model.

[1]  Joel S. Warm,et al.  The Psychophysics of Vigilance , 1980 .

[2]  R. Thayer The biopsychology of mood and arousal , 1989 .

[3]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[4]  G. Keppel,et al.  Data analysis for research designs: Analysis of variance and multiple regression/correlation approaches. , 1990 .

[5]  J. Hittner,et al.  Effects of neuroticism and workload history on performance , 2004 .

[6]  Gerald Matthews,et al.  Personality, Coping and Task-Induced Stress in Customer Service Personnel , 2002 .

[7]  I. Robertson,et al.  The absent mind: further investigations of sustained attention to response , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  G. Matthews,et al.  Arousal, extraversion, and individual differences in resource availability , 1990 .

[9]  W. N. Dember,et al.  Training for vigilance: the effect of knowledge of results format and dispositional optimism and pessimism on performance and stress. , 2006, British journal of psychology.

[10]  C. Wickens,et al.  Workload transition: Implications for individual and team performance. , 1993 .

[11]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  An introduction to human factors engineering , 1997 .

[12]  C. Castelfranchi,et al.  Anxiety as an “epistemic” emotion: An uncertainty theory of anxiety , 2005 .

[13]  Cheryl K. Beeler,et al.  Workload history effects: A comparison of sudden increases and decreases on performance , 2006 .

[14]  R. Lazarus Psychological stress and the coping process , 1970 .

[15]  Peter A. Hancock,et al.  Defeating Terrorism: What Can Human Factors/Ergonomics Offer? , 2002 .

[16]  Donald E. Broadbent,et al.  Decision and stress , 1971 .

[17]  M. Loeb,et al.  The Psychology of Vigilance , 1982 .

[18]  J. Warm,et al.  Effects of shifts in the rate of repetitive stimulation on sustained attention , 1975 .

[19]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[20]  Richard S. Lazanis Stress and emotion, a new synthesis , 1999 .

[21]  Joel S. Warm,et al.  The Effects of Signal Salience and Caffeine on Performance, Workload, and Stress in an Abbreviated Vigilance Task , 2000, Hum. Factors.

[22]  P. Hancock,et al.  A Dynamic Model of Stress and Sustained Attention , 1989, Human factors.

[23]  R. A. Bailey Designing Experiments and Analyzing Data: a Model Comparison Perspective, 2nd edn , 2005 .

[24]  Gerald Matthews,et al.  Individual differences in energetic arousal and sustained attention: a dual-task study , 2001 .

[25]  M. Humphreys,et al.  Personality, motivation, and performance: a theory of the relationship between individual differences and information processing. , 1984, Psychological review.

[26]  W. Hirst,et al.  Characterizing attentional resources. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[27]  R. Kirk Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences , 1970 .

[28]  S. Folkman,et al.  Stress, appraisal, and coping , 1974 .

[29]  G. R. J. Hockey Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload: A cognitive-energetical framework , 1997, Biological Psychology.

[30]  Rebecca A. Grier,et al.  Fundamental dimensions of subjective state in performance settings: task engagement, distress, and worry. , 2002, Emotion.

[31]  Amanda K. Emo,et al.  Emotional intelligence, personality, and task-induced stress. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[32]  Amanda D. Angie,et al.  The effects of workload history on dual task performance , 2005 .

[33]  Kelley S. Parsons,et al.  The abbreviated vigilance task and cerebral hemodynamics , 2007, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[34]  Paula A. Desmond,et al.  Personality and multiple dimensions of task-induced fatigue: a study of simulated driving , 1998 .

[35]  R R Rosa,et al.  Demand transitions and sustained attention. , 1993, The Journal of general psychology.

[36]  G. Matthews,et al.  Arousal and vigilance: The role of task demands. , 1998 .

[37]  Roger E. Kirk,et al.  Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). , 1995 .

[38]  F. Braceland THE STRESS OF LIFE , 1976 .

[39]  W. N. Dember,et al.  Psychophysical Determinants of Stress in Sustained Attention , 1993, Human factors.

[40]  I. Robertson,et al.  `Oops!': Performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[41]  Todd D. Hollander,et al.  Signal regularity and the mindlessness model of vigilance. , 2005, British journal of psychology.

[42]  Scott E. Maxwell,et al.  Designing Experiments and Analyzing Data: A Model Comparison Perspective , 1990 .

[43]  Stanley Coren,et al.  Sensation and perception , 1979 .

[44]  W. N. Dember,et al.  The Common Cold Impairs Visual Attention, Psychomotor Performance and Task Engagement , 2001 .

[45]  C. Wickens Engineering psychology and human performance, 2nd ed. , 1992 .

[46]  Tom Diethe,et al.  HUMAN PERFORMANCE, SITUATION AWARENESS AND AUTOMATION: CURRENT RESEARCH AND TRENDS, VOL 2 , 2004 .

[47]  Joel S. Warm,et al.  Optimism, pessimism, and false failure feedback: Effects on vigilance performance , 1999 .