Strategic Environmental Policy, Clean Technologies and the Learning Curve

In the political discussion, it is often emphasized that the environmental service industry (which produces a clean factor of production) benefits from an early and strong environmental policy. This is especially likely if the costs of production are decreasing over time due to learning curve effects. Surprisingly, the environmental service industry has not been integrated into the theory of strategic environmental policy yet. Our main question is whether a national leadership in environmental policy can pay off if profits of the environmental service industry are taken into account. We consider a two-period model with one firm in each country competing on a third market. Emissions can be substituted by the clean factor when deciding upon the production technology. The unit costs of producing the clean factor in the second period are decreasing in the quantity produced in the initial period. We derive the optimal environmental policy for both periods from a national point of view and show that the presence of the environmental service industry can indeed lead to a national leadership in pollution control.

[1]  A. Ulph Political Institutions and the Design of Environmental Policy in a Federal System with Asymmetric Information , 1998 .

[2]  P. Dasgupta,et al.  Learning-by-doing, Market Structure and Industrial and Trade Policies , 1988 .

[3]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Environmental Regulation and Innovation: A Panel Data Study , 1996, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[4]  J. Wackerbauer Struktur und Wettbewerbssituation der Anbieter von Umwelttechnik und unweltfreundlicher Technik , 1995 .

[5]  M. Porter The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .

[6]  J. Brander,et al.  Strategic Trade Policy , 1995 .

[7]  M. Rege Strategic Policy and Environmental Quality: Helping the Domestic Industry to Provide Credible Information , 2000 .

[8]  K. Conrad Optimal environmental policy for oligopolistic industries under intra-industry trade , 1996 .

[9]  Wilhelm Althammer,et al.  Distorting Environmental Taxes: The Role of the Market Structure / Zweitbeste Umweltabgaben: Die Rolle der Marktstruktur bei internationalem Handel , 1999 .

[10]  Scott Barrett,et al.  Strategic environmental policy and intrenational trade , 1994 .

[11]  Alistair Ulph,et al.  Strategic environmental policy and international trade — the role of market conduct , 1994 .

[12]  A. Soubeyran,et al.  Environmental taxation, market share, and profits in oligopoly , 1996 .

[13]  A. Ulph,et al.  Trade, strategic innovation and strategic environmental policy: a general analysis , 1996 .

[14]  D. Fudenberg,et al.  Learning-by-Doing and Market Performance , 1983 .

[15]  Subhayu Bandyopadhyay,et al.  Demand elasticities, asymmetry and strategic trade policy , 1997 .

[16]  W. Baumol Environmental Industries with Substantial Start-Up Costs as Contributors to Trade Competitiveness , 1995 .

[17]  Kresimir Zigic,et al.  Strategic Trade Policy, Spillovers, and the Uncertain Mode of , 2001 .

[18]  N. Nannerup Strategic Environmental Policy Under Incomplete Information , 1998 .

[19]  Andrea Gregg,et al.  Learning From Doing: Lessons Learned From Designing and Developing an Educational Software Within a Heterogeneous Group , 2021, Int. J. Web Based Learn. Teach. Technol..