The Current Use of Social Media in Neurosurgery.

OBJECTIVE To measure the presence and popularity of neurosurgical departments, journals, and nonprofit organizations on 3 major social networks. METHODS A systematic 2-pronged search strategy was used in June 2015 to identify all accounts on Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube that were relevant to neurosurgery. Online search was conducted by 2 independent authors. All accounts were ranked according to their popularity data. RESULTS Our search yielded 158 social media accounts (86 Facebook, 59 Twitter, and 13 YouTube) of neurosurgical private and academic practice departments. Of the 158 accounts we retrieved, 117 were for private practice centers (74%). Accounts of academic and private departments had a similar median number of "likes" and "followers" on Facebook and Twitter, respectively. Seven neurosurgical journals only had active Facebook and Twitter accounts (of 20 screened journals). When compared with studies of social media in other medical subspecialties, the use of these networks in neurosurgery followed a similar pattern in their presence and popularity. CONCLUSIONS The current study shows different uses of social media platforms and numbers of users of the online neurosurgical community. Content optimization, advanced metrics of user engagement, and their subsequent effects on academic impact remain unanswered queries and require further prospective study.

[1]  J. Johnston,et al.  Technology preferences among caregivers of children with hydrocephalus. , 2013, Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics.

[2]  P. Feustel,et al.  Workforce demand for neurosurgeons in the United States of America: a 13-year retrospective study. , 1999, Journal of neurosurgery.

[3]  R. Bush,et al.  Social media is a necessary component of surgery practice. , 2015, Surgery.

[4]  Heidi G. Allen,et al.  Social Media Release Increases Dissemination of Original Articles in the Clinical Pain Sciences , 2013, PloS one.

[5]  Gunther Eysenbach,et al.  Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[6]  Anand M Prabhakar,et al.  Radiology and social media: are private practice radiology groups more social than academic radiology departments? , 2015, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[7]  J. Micieli,et al.  Ophthalmology on social networking sites: an observational study of Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn , 2015, Clinical ophthalmology.

[8]  Robert P. Dellavalle,et al.  Social networking sites: emerging and essential tools for communication in dermatology. , 2014, JAMA dermatology.

[9]  Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al.  Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services , 2013, PloS one.

[10]  C Matthew Hawkins,et al.  Social media in radiology: early trends in Twitter microblogging at radiology's largest international meeting. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[11]  Nathan Lawrentschuk,et al.  The emerging use of Twitter by urological journals , 2015, BJU international.

[12]  Chris Boyer.  Social media for healthcare makes sense. , 2011, Frontiers of health services management.

[13]  Nathan Lawrentschuk,et al.  The social media revolution is changing the conference experience: analytics and trends from eight international meetings , 2015, BJU international.

[14]  W. Couldwell,et al.  Neurosurgical workforce trends in the United States. , 2005, Journal of neurosurgery.

[15]  Gary L. Kreps,et al.  Trust and sources of health information: the impact of the Internet and its implications for health care providers: findings from the first Health Information National Trends Survey. , 2005, Archives of internal medicine.