A practical approach to determine dose metrics for nanomaterials

Traditionally, administered mass is used to describe doses of conventional chemical substances in toxicity studies. For deriving toxic doses of nanomaterials, mass and chemical composition alone may not adequately describe the dose, because particles with the same chemical composition can have completely different toxic mass doses depending on properties such as particle size. Other dose metrics such as particle number, volume, or surface area have been suggested, but consensus is lacking. The discussion regarding the most adequate dose metric for nanomaterials clearly needs a systematic, unbiased approach to determine the most appropriate dose metric for nanomaterials. In the present study, the authors propose such an approach and apply it to results from in vitro and in vivo experiments with silver and silica nanomaterials. The proposed approach is shown to provide a convenient tool to systematically investigate and interpret dose metrics of nanomaterials. Recommendations for study designs aimed at investigating dose metrics are provided.

[1]  Kenneth A. Dawson,et al.  In vitro evaluation of cytotoxic and inflammatory properties of silica nanoparticles of different sizes in murine RAW 264.7 macrophages , 2011 .

[2]  Sally S Tinkle,et al.  Maximizing safe design of engineered nanomaterials: the NIH and NIEHS research perspective. , 2010, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology.

[3]  Vincent Castranova,et al.  Surface area of particle administered versus mass in determining the pulmonary toxicity of ultrafine and fine carbon black: comparison to ultrafine titanium dioxide , 2009, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[4]  T. Braunbeck,et al.  Is the fish embryo toxicity test (FET) with the zebrafish (Danio rerio) a potential alternative for the fish acute toxicity test? , 2009, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Toxicology & pharmacology : CBP.

[5]  K. Wittmaack In Search of the Most Relevant Parameter for Quantifying Lung Inflammatory Response to Nanoparticle Exposure: Particle Number, Surface Area, or What? , 2006, Environmental health perspectives.

[6]  Richard D Handy,et al.  Impact of silver nanoparticle contamination on the genetic diversity of natural bacterial assemblages in estuarine sediments. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  Zhuang Wang,et al.  Aquatic toxicity of nanosilver colloids to different trophic organisms: Contributions of particles and free silver ion , 2012, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[8]  W. MacNee,et al.  The pro-inflammatory effects of low-toxicity low-solubility particles, nanoparticles and fine particles, on epithelial cells in vitro: the role of surface area , 2007, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[9]  Joel G Pounds,et al.  ISDD: A computational model of particle sedimentation, diffusion and target cell dosimetry for in vitro toxicity studies , 2010, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[10]  Jürgen Pauluhn,et al.  Poorly soluble particulates: searching for a unifying denominator of nanoparticles and fine particles for DNEL estimation. , 2011, Toxicology.

[11]  T. T. ter Laak,et al.  Development and application of a sediment toxicity test using the benthic cladoceran Chydorus sphaericus. , 2006, Environmental pollution.

[12]  W. D. de Jong,et al.  The effect of particle size on the cytotoxicity, inflammation, developmental toxicity and genotoxicity of silver nanoparticles. , 2011, Biomaterials.