A conceptualisation of management situations relevant for collaborative IS research projects

Collaborative research projects as a means to organise Information Systems research and prototyping activities become increasingly widespread. Their management is challenged by a multiplicity of different partners, activities and results. Required is a project management approach that allows for flexibility within the project life-cycle to address changing needs. We present research in progress aimed at conceptualising the notion of project management relevant situations in this context. This discriminates the conditions and circumstances under which management involvement becomes necessary and thus enables the definition of a suitable management approach. We identify a set of constituent factors to describe different situations based on a literature review and interviews with project managers involved in collaborative research projects. Future research is presented with respect to completing the full analysis cycle of our thematic analysis and the development of a situation-specific project management approach.

[1]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[2]  Jan vom Brocke,et al.  Taking a Project Management Perspective on Design Science Research , 2010, DESRIST.

[3]  Thierry Picq,et al.  Inter-organisational projects in french innovation clusters: the construction of collaboration , 2010 .

[4]  Robin Williams,et al.  Interdisciplinary integration in Europe: the case of the Fifth Framework programme , 2004 .

[5]  J. Davidson Frame.  Book Review: Reinventing Project Management: The Diamond Approach to Successful Growth and Innovation , 2008 .

[6]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[7]  Julien Pollack,et al.  Hard and soft projects: a framework for analysis , 2004 .

[8]  Maria Kapsali,et al.  Systems thinking in innovation project management: A match that works , 2011 .

[9]  Viorel Vulturescu,et al.  Challenges in Implementing FP7 Projects in the Public Institutions , 2012 .

[10]  Jan vom Brocke,et al.  Towards A Situational Approach In Managing Collaborative Research Projects In IS - Finding The Right Contigency Factors , 2011, PACIS.

[11]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[12]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on New Methods for Adaptive Water Management A Framing Approach to Cross-disciplinary Research Collaboration: Experiences from a Large-scale Research Project on Adaptive Water Management , 2007 .

[13]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Lost Roots: How Project Management Came to Emphasize Control over Flexibility and Novelty , 2010 .

[14]  Rob Pooley,et al.  The importance of process , 2004 .

[15]  Fredrik Hacklin,et al.  Sponsored, contract and collaborative research: towards a model of science-industry knowledge transfer , 2009 .

[16]  Jos van Hillegersberg,et al.  Identifying Project Contingency Factors for Situational Project Management Method Engineering , 2011 .

[17]  L. Vaccarezza.  The new production of knowledge. The dinamics of science and research in contemporary societies, Michael Gibbons, Camille Limoges, Hega Nowotny, Simon Schwartzman, Peter Scott y Martin Trow, Londres, SAGE Publications, 1994, 179 páginas. , 1995 .

[18]  Thomas E. Clarke.  Unique features of an R&D work environment and research scientists and engineers , 2002 .

[19]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  A Contingency Approach to Software Project Coordination , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Gregory Alexander.  How To (Almost) Schedule Innovation , 2002 .

[21]  K. Perreault,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2011 .

[22]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review , 2002, MIS Q..

[23]  J. Klein,et al.  Analyzing interdisciplinarity: Typology and indicators , 2010 .

[24]  Rainer Seidel,et al.  A project contingency framework based on uncertainty and its consequences , 2010 .

[25]  Mark Winter,et al.  The importance of ‘process’ in Rethinking Project Management: The story of a UK Government-funded research network , 2006 .

[26]  Katharina Helming,et al.  A framework for structuring interdisciplinary research management , 2013 .

[27]  O. Gassmann,et al.  Trends and determinants of managing virtual R&D teams , 2003 .

[28]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[29]  Niclas Adler,et al.  The challenge of managing boundary-spanning research activities: Experiences from the Swedish context , 2009 .

[30]  Tuure Tuunanen,et al.  Methodology for Information Systems Research , 2008 .

[31]  C. Pohl,et al.  Handbook of transdisciplinary research , 2008 .

[32]  J. S. Katz,et al.  What is research collaboration , 1997 .

[33]  J. R. Turner,et al.  Goals-and-methods matrix: coping with projects with ill defined goals and/or methods of achieving them , 1993 .

[34]  Marianne W. Lewis,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT TENSIONS: EXPLORING CONTRASTING STYLES OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT , 2002 .

[35]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[36]  Vittorio Chiesa,et al.  Exploring the Differences in Performance Measurement between Research and Development: Evidence from a Multiple Case Study , 2007 .

[37]  A. Salter,et al.  The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review , 2001 .

[38]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  An Integrative Contingency Model of Software Project Risk Management , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[39]  H. V. Lente,et al.  Re-thinking new knowledge production: A literature review and a research agenda , 2008 .

[40]  G. Laudel.  What do we measure by co-authorships? , 2002 .

[41]  Marjolein van Offenbeek,et al.  Scenarios for system development: Matching context and strategy , 1996, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[42]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  and An Integrative Contingency Model of Software Project Risk Management,” Journal of Management Information Systems (4), June, pp. . , 2001 .

[43]  Peter J Cox,et al.  Research and development — or research design and development? , 1990 .

[44]  Sanja Steiner.  7th Framework Programme FP7 , 2010 .

[45]  Robin Teigland,et al.  Ensuring project success through collective competence and creative conflict in public–private partnerships – A case study of Bygga Villa, a Swedish triple helix e-government initiative , 2009 .

[46]  Sylvain Lenfle,et al.  Exploration and Project Management , 2008 .

[47]  A. Wald,et al.  A Bibliometric View on the Use of Contingency Theory in Project Management Research , 2012 .

[48]  Sally Davenport,et al.  Collaborative research programmes: building trust from difference , 1998 .

[49]  Richard E. Boyatzis,et al.  Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development , 1998 .

[50]  Marc Wouters,et al.  Managing Uncertainty During R&D Projects: A Case Study , 2011 .

[51]  Eamonn Molloy,et al.  From Organising as Projects to Projects as Organisations , 2008 .

[52]  Aaron J. Shenhar,et al.  Why projects fail? How contingency theory can provide new insights – A comparative analysis of NASA’s Mars Climate Orbiter loss , 2009 .

[53]  Samir Chatterjee,et al.  A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research , 2008 .

[54]  Aaron J. Shenhar,et al.  Contingent management in temporary, dynamic organizations: The comparative analysis of projects , 2001 .

[55]  V. Chiesa.  Separating research from development: Evidence from the pharmaceutical industry , 1996 .

[56]  Aaron J. Shenhar,et al.  Reinventing project management : the diamond approach to successful growth & innovation , 2007 .

[57]  Mohan V. Tatikonda,et al.  Successful execution of product development projects: Balancing firmness and flexibility in the innovation process , 2000 .