More than Meets the Tie: Examining the Role of Interpersonal Relationships in Social Networks

Topics in conversations depend in part on the type of interpersonal relationship between speakers, such as friendship, kinship, or romance. Identifying these relationships can provide a rich description of how individuals communicate and reveal how relationships influence the way people share information. Using a dataset of more than 9.6M dyads of Twitter users, we show how relationship types influence language use, topic diversity, communication frequencies, and diurnal patterns of conversations. These differences can be used to predict the relationship between two users, with the best predictive model achieving a macro F1 score of 0.70. We also demonstrate how relationship types influence communication dynamics through the task of predicting future retweets. Adding relationships as a feature to a strong baseline model increases the F1 and recall by 1% and 2%. The results of this study suggest relationship types have the potential to provide new insights into how communication and information diffusion occur in social

[1]  Eric Gilbert,et al.  Predicting tie strength with social media , 2009, CHI.

[2]  Kimmo Kaski,et al.  Communication with Family and Friends across the Life Course , 2015, PloS one.

[3]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  Romantic partnerships and the dispersion of social ties: a network analysis of relationship status on facebook , 2013, CSCW.

[4]  Huiwen Lian,et al.  Frankly, We Do Give a Damn , 2017, Social psychological and personality science.

[5]  Anna Gorrese,et al.  Peer Attachment: A Meta-analytic Review of Gender and Age Differences and Associations with Parent Attachment , 2012, Journal of youth and adolescence.

[6]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Families on Facebook , 2013, ICWSM.

[7]  Sibel Adali,et al.  Actions speak as loud as words: predicting relationships from social behavior data , 2012, WWW.

[8]  Nicholas Jing Yuan,et al.  Who Will Reply to/Retweet This Tweet?: The Dynamics of Intimacy from Online Social Interactions , 2016, WSDM.

[9]  Elizabeth F. Churchill,et al.  Faceted identity, faceted lives: social and technical issues with being yourself online , 2011, CSCW.

[10]  Jayson L. Dibble,et al.  Human Communication Research Issn 0360-3989 Parasocial Interaction and Parasocial Relationship: Conceptual Clarification and a Critical Assessment of Measures , 2022 .

[11]  Marco Conti,et al.  Dynamics of personal social relationships in online social networks: a study on twitter , 2013, COSN '13.

[12]  Christopher J. Fariss,et al.  Inferring Tie Strength from Online Directed Behavior , 2013, PloS one.

[13]  Huan Liu,et al.  Leveraging Social Foci for Information Seeking in Social Media , 2015, AAAI.

[14]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  H. W. Richey,et al.  The significance of best‐friend relationships in adolescence , 1980 .

[16]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  A Hierarchical Location Prediction Neural Network for Twitter User Geolocation , 2019, EMNLP.

[17]  Eduardo Blanco,et al.  Dimensions of Interpersonal Relationships: Corpus and Experiments , 2017, EMNLP.

[18]  Laura Stafford,et al.  Maintenance Strategies and Romantic Relationship Type, Gender and Relational Characteristics , 1991 .

[19]  Omer Levy,et al.  RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach , 2019, ArXiv.

[20]  Venkata Rama Kiran Garimella,et al.  Understanding Para Social Breakups on Twitter , 2017, WebSci.

[21]  Robin I. M. Dunbar,et al.  Romance and reproduction are socially costly. , 2015 .

[22]  Eric Gilbert,et al.  Predicting tie strength in a new medium , 2012, CSCW.

[23]  Benjamin Van Durme,et al.  Using Conceptual Class Attributes to Characterize Social Media Users , 2013, ACL.

[24]  Mark S. Granovetter T H E S T R E N G T H O F WEAK TIES: A NETWORK THEORY REVISITED , 1983 .

[25]  E. Berscheid,et al.  The Relationship Closeness Inventory : Assessing the Closeness of Interpersonal Relationships , 2004 .

[26]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  Want to be Retweeted? Large Scale Analytics on Factors Impacting Retweet in Twitter Network , 2010, 2010 IEEE Second International Conference on Social Computing.

[27]  Robin I. M. Dunbar,et al.  Communication in social networks: Effects of kinship, network size, and emotional closeness , 2011 .

[28]  R. Hays,et al.  The Development and Maintenance of Friendship , 1984 .

[29]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Calling All Facebook Friends: Exploring Requests for Help on Facebook , 2013, ICWSM.

[30]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[31]  Felix Naumann,et al.  Analyzing and predicting viral tweets , 2013, WWW.

[32]  John Zimmerman,et al.  Mining smartphone data to classify life-facets of social relationships , 2013, CSCW.

[33]  Blake E. Ashforth,et al.  Relational Identity and Identification: Defining Ourselves Through Work Relationships , 2007 .

[34]  I. Altman,et al.  Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships , 1973 .

[35]  Huan Liu,et al.  Integrating Social Media Data for Community Detection , 2011, MSM/MUSE.

[36]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Measuring User Influence in Twitter: The Million Follower Fallacy , 2010, ICWSM.

[37]  Nitish Srivastava,et al.  Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting , 2014, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[38]  S. C. Hui,et al.  CoupleNet: Paying Attention to Couples with Coupled Attention for Relationship Recommendation , 2018, ICWSM.

[39]  B. B. Brown,et al.  The development of romantic relationships in adolescence , 1999 .

[40]  L. Verbrugge A Research Note on Adult Friendship Contact: A Dyadic Perspective , 1983 .

[41]  Michael S. Bernstein,et al.  Empath: Understanding Topic Signals in Large-Scale Text , 2016, CHI.

[42]  Miles Osborne,et al.  RT to Win! Predicting Message Propagation in Twitter , 2011, ICWSM.

[43]  Gueorgi Kossinets,et al.  Empirical Analysis of an Evolving Social Network , 2006, Science.

[44]  Riva Tukachinsky,et al.  Para-Romantic Love and Para-Friendships: Development and Assessment of a Multiple-Parasocial Relationships Scale , 2010 .

[45]  Aaron D. Johnson,et al.  Perceived solidarity, self‐disclosure, and trust in organizational peer relationships , 2004 .

[46]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Predicting positive and negative links in online social networks , 2010, WWW '10.

[47]  W. Hartup,et al.  Friendships and Adaptation Across the Life Span , 1999 .

[48]  A. Bell Language style as audience design , 1984, Language in Society.

[49]  Amanda K. Kehrberg ‘I love you, please notice me’: the hierarchical rhetoric of Twitter fandom , 2015 .

[50]  Jacob G Foster,et al.  Edge direction and the structure of networks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[51]  A. Kirilenko,et al.  Inter-Coder Agreement in One-to-Many Classification: Fuzzy Kappa , 2016, PloS one.

[52]  Scott A. Golder,et al.  Diurnal and Seasonal Mood Vary with Work, Sleep, and Daylength Across Diverse Cultures , 2011 .

[53]  Eduardo Blanco,et al.  Characterizing Interactions and Relationships between People , 2018, EMNLP.

[54]  Shelly Farnham,et al.  Life "modes" in social media , 2011, CHI.

[55]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Modeling Self-Disclosure in Social Networking Sites , 2016, CSCW.

[56]  Ming-Wei Chang,et al.  BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding , 2019, NAACL.

[57]  Casey Fiesler,et al.  “Participant” Perceptions of Twitter Research Ethics , 2018 .

[58]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Exploring Limits to Prediction in Complex Social Systems , 2016, WWW.

[59]  Daniele Quercia,et al.  The Social World of Twitter: Topics, Geography, and Emotions , 2012, ICWSM.

[60]  D. Quercia,et al.  Ten Social Dimensions of Conversations and Relationships , 2020, WWW.

[61]  Katherine J. Klein,et al.  Psychological sense of community in the workplace , 1986 .

[62]  S. Feld Social Structural Determinants of Similarity among Associates , 1982 .

[63]  Stefan Stieglitz,et al.  AN INVESTIGATION OF INFLUENTIALS AND THE ROLE OF SENTIMENT IN POLITICAL COMMUNICATION ON TWITTER DURING ELECTION PERIODS , 2013 .

[64]  A. Arvidsson,et al.  Echo Chamber or Public Sphere? Predicting Political Orientation and Measuring Political Homophily in Twitter Using Big Data , 2014 .

[65]  Benjamin Van Durme,et al.  I'm a Belieber: Social Roles via Self-identification and Conceptual Attributes , 2014, ACL.

[66]  Gayle S. Stever,et al.  Twitter as a way for celebrities to communicate with fans: Implications for the study of parasocial interaction. , 2013 .

[67]  Brian D. Davison,et al.  Predicting popular messages in Twitter , 2011, WWW.

[68]  Henry Tirri,et al.  Combining Topic Models and Social Networks for Chat Data Mining , 2004, IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI'04).

[69]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Signed networks in social media , 2010, CHI.

[70]  Justin Cheng,et al.  Predicting Reciprocity in Social Networks , 2011, 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Social Computing.

[71]  Ryan L. Boyd,et al.  The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC2015 , 2015 .

[72]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Growing closer on facebook: changes in tie strength through social network site use , 2014, CHI.

[73]  Chenhao Tan,et al.  On the Interplay between Social and Topical Structure , 2011, ICWSM.

[74]  Verónica Pérez-Rosas,et al.  Look Who's Talking: Inferring Speaker Attributes from Personal Longitudinal Dialog , 2019, ArXiv.

[75]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Social influence and the diffusion of user-created content , 2009, EC '09.

[76]  Munmun De Choudhury,et al.  Mental Health Discourse on reddit: Self-Disclosure, Social Support, and Anonymity , 2014, ICWSM.

[77]  M. Knapp,et al.  Perceptions of communication behavior associated with relationship terms , 1980 .

[78]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[79]  S. Feld The Focused Organization of Social Ties , 1981, American Journal of Sociology.

[80]  Sook Jung Lee,et al.  Online Communication and Adolescent Social Ties: Who benefits more from Internet use? , 2009, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[81]  Stefano Ceri,et al.  Topology comparison of Twitter diffusion networks reliably reveals disinformation news , 2019, ArXiv.

[82]  Leslie A. Baxter,et al.  Blended relationships: Friends as work associates , 1992 .

[83]  Hosung Park,et al.  What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? , 2010, WWW '10.

[84]  Yoon Kim,et al.  Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classification , 2014, EMNLP.

[85]  Kristy Beers Fägersten Who's Swearing Now? The Social Aspects of Conversational Swearing , 2012 .

[86]  N. Shulman Life-Cycle Variations in Patterns of Close Relationships. , 1975 .

[87]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.

[88]  Tianqi Chen,et al.  XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System , 2016, KDD.

[89]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Everyone's an influencer: quantifying influence on twitter , 2011, WSDM '11.

[90]  Javier Rivas,et al.  Friendship selection , 2009, Int. J. Game Theory.

[91]  Christopher M. Danforth,et al.  An evolutionary algorithm approach to link prediction in dynamic social networks , 2013, J. Comput. Sci..

[92]  Natalia Gimelshein,et al.  PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library , 2019, NeurIPS.

[93]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Friends and neighbors on the Web , 2003, Soc. Networks.

[94]  Lukasz Kaiser,et al.  Attention is All you Need , 2017, NIPS.