Restricting weights in value efficiency analysis

In this paper, we consider the problem of incorporating additional preference information into Value Efficiency Analysis by using the "price" information of inputs and outputs. This is done to improve the accuracy of the estimation of the Value Efficiency Scores. Value Efficiency developed by Halme et al (1998) is an efficiency concept, which takes into account the decision maker's preferences. Value Efficiency Analysis is based on the assumption that an explicitly known value function reaches its maximum at the Most Preferred Solution on the efficient frontier. The Most Preferred solution is an input- output vector preferred to all other possible input-output vectors. The ultimate goal is to measure a need to improve (radially) the values of inputs and/or outputs to make them equally preferred to the Most Preferred Solution. Because we do not know the value function, we approximate the indifference curves of all possible value functions satisfying certain assumptions by their tangents at the Most Preferred Solution. However, in addition to the Most preferred Solution information about the "prices" of inputs and outputs may be available as well. We show how this information can be incorporated into the analysis and illustrate the approach by an example on the performance of municipal dental units in Finland.

[1]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[2]  Yaakov Roll,et al.  Incorporating Standards via DEA , 1994 .

[3]  Francisco Pedraja-Chaparro,et al.  On the Role of Weight Restrictions in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1997 .

[4]  Pekka Korhonen,et al.  Structural Comparison of Data Envelopment Analysis and Multiple Objective Linear Programming , 1998 .

[5]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Simulating Weights Restrictions in Data Envelopment Analysis by Means of Unobserved Dmus , 1998 .

[6]  Barton A. Smith,et al.  Comparative Site Evaluations for Locating a High-Energy Physics Lab in Texas , 1986 .

[7]  Hanif D. Sherali,et al.  Linear Programming and Network Flows , 1977 .

[8]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Estimating preferred target input−output levels using data envelopment analysis , 1992 .

[9]  Russell G. Thompson,et al.  The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas farming , 1990 .

[10]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[11]  B. Golany,et al.  Controlling Factor Weights in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1991 .

[12]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Cone ratio data envelopment analysis and multi-objective programming , 1989 .

[13]  A. Charnes,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis Theory, Methodology and Applications , 1995 .

[14]  J. Wallenius,et al.  A Value Efficiency Approach to Incorporating Preference Information in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1999 .

[15]  R. Dyson,et al.  Reducing Weight Flexibility in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1988 .

[16]  Martin E. Dyer,et al.  An algorithm for determining all extreme points of a convex polytope , 1977, Math. Program..

[17]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Weights restrictions and value judgements in Data Envelopment Analysis: Evolution, development and future directions , 1997, Ann. Oper. Res..

[18]  Joseph G. Ecker,et al.  Finding all efficient extreme points for multiple objective linear programs , 1978, Math. Program..

[19]  Boaz Golany,et al.  An Interactive MOLP Procedure for the Extension of DEA to Effectiveness Analysis , 1988 .

[20]  John E. Beasley,et al.  Restricting Weight Flexibility in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1990 .

[21]  William W. Cooper,et al.  SHORT COMMUNICATION: MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION MAKING UNITS , 1979 .