Design optimization under uncertainty of hybrid fuel cell energy systems for power generation and cooling purposes

Abstract Reliance on point estimates when developing hybrid energy systems can over/underestimate system performance. Analyzing the sensitivity and uncertainty of large-scale hybrid systems can be a challenging task due to the large number of design parameters to be explored. In this work, a comprehensive and efficient sensitivity/uncertainty methodology is applied on two fuel cell hybrid systems to help analysts to investigate hybrid systems more efficiently. This methodology also includes a step-by-step approach to perform design optimization under uncertainty of energy systems. The two hybrid systems are: molten carbonate fuel cell with thermoelectric generator (MCFC-TEG) and phosphoric acid fuel cell with refrigerator (PAFC-REF). Various sensitivity and uncertainty methods are utilized to analyze the design parameters and their effect on the performance of these two systems. These methods perform local and regression-based sensitivity analysis, Monte Carlo uncertainty propagation, parameter screening, and variance decomposition. Detailed approach is adopted to identify and rank the influential design parameters for each system. Results demonstrate that the optimum power output of the MCFC-TEG has 10% uncertainty, driven mainly by the operating temperature, cahtode activation energy, TEG figure of merit, and TEG thermal conductivity. However, PAFC-REF is more reliable with larger power output and 1.4% uncertainty, driven by the charge transfer coefficient, heat transfer in the refrigeration cycle, cold reservoir temperature, and operating temperature. Based on this identification, design optimization under uncertainty is performed using these sensitive parameters to improve the system performance through increasing the power output and reducing its uncertainty.

[1]  Anna G. Stefanopoulou,et al.  A thermoelectric generator in exhaust systems of spark-ignition and compression-ignition engines. A comparison with an electric turbo-generator , 2018, Applied Energy.

[2]  M. Radaideh,et al.  Shapley effect application for variance-based sensitivity analysis of the few-group cross-sections , 2019, Annals of Nuclear Energy.

[3]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Survey of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[4]  Mahaveer D. Kurkuri,et al.  A comprehensive review on unitized regenerative fuel cells: Crucial challenges and developments , 2017 .

[5]  V. Vishnyakov Proton exchange membrane fuel cells , 2006 .

[6]  Frederick Dynys,et al.  Uncertainty analysis for common Seebeck and electrical resistivity measurement systems. , 2014, The Review of scientific instruments.

[7]  Omar Z. Sharaf,et al.  An overview of fuel cell technology: Fundamentals and applications , 2014 .

[8]  Ilya M. Sobol,et al.  Sensitivity Estimates for Nonlinear Mathematical Models , 1993 .

[9]  Meng Ni,et al.  Performance assessment of a hybrid system integrating a molten carbonate fuel cell and a thermoelectric generator , 2016 .

[10]  Andrea Saltelli,et al.  An effective screening design for sensitivity analysis of large models , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[11]  Thierry Alex Mara,et al.  Variance-based sensitivity indices for models with dependent inputs , 2012, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[12]  Y. Çengel,et al.  Thermodynamics : An Engineering Approach , 1989 .

[13]  Yuan Wang,et al.  A study of double functions and load matching of a phosphoric acid fuel cell/heat-driven refrigerator hybrid system , 2016 .

[14]  Daniel Hissel,et al.  A review of multi-stack and modular fuel cell systems: Interests, application areas and on-going research activities , 2014 .

[15]  Barry L. Nelson,et al.  Shapley Effects for Global Sensitivity Analysis: Theory and Computation , 2016, SIAM/ASA J. Uncertain. Quantification.

[16]  M. Eslami,et al.  Numerical simulation of a photovoltaic thermoelectric hybrid power generation system , 2018, Solar Energy.

[17]  Jincan Chen,et al.  Performance analysis and multi-objective optimization of a new molten carbonate fuel cell system , 2011 .

[18]  Bihong Lin,et al.  Optimal design of a multi-couple thermoelectric generator , 2000 .

[19]  Daming Zhou,et al.  Global Parameters Sensitivity Analysis and Development of a Two-Dimensional Real-Time Model of Proton-Exchange-Membrane Fuel Cells , 2018 .

[20]  Nathan P. Siegel,et al.  On the influence of temperature on PEM fuel cell operation , 2006 .

[21]  Ibrahim Alaefour Current and Temperature Distributions in Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell , 2012 .

[22]  Abdellatif Miraoui,et al.  Methanol fuel processor and PEM fuel cell modeling for mobile application , 2010 .

[23]  H. Chandra,et al.  Application of solid oxide fuel cell technology for power generation—A review , 2013 .

[24]  Ziyang Hu,et al.  Performance characteristics of a direct carbon fuel cell/thermoelectric generator hybrid system , 2015 .

[25]  Lingen Chen,et al.  Thermoelectric-generator with linear phenomenological heat-transfer law , 2005 .

[26]  Marc A. Rosen,et al.  Process development and exergy cost sensitivity analysis of a hybrid molten carbonate fuel cell power plant and carbon dioxide capturing process , 2017 .

[27]  Wei Tian,et al.  A review of sensitivity analysis methods in building energy analysis , 2013 .

[28]  Won-Yong Lee,et al.  Performance of solid alkaline fuel cells employing anion-exchange membranes , 2008 .

[29]  M. Ahmadi,et al.  Parametric investigation of phosphoric acid fuel cell - Thermally regenerative electro chemical hybrid system , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[30]  Jonghark Park,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF CONVECTIVE HEAT TRANSFER IN A NARROW RECTANGULAR CHANNEL FOR UPWARD AND DOWNWARD FLOWS , 2014 .

[31]  Saltelli Andrea,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer , 2008 .

[32]  P. Ekins,et al.  Hydrogen and fuel cell technologies for heating: A review , 2015 .

[33]  A. Kasaeian,et al.  Performance investigation of a hybrid photovoltaic/thermoelectric system integrated with parabolic trough collector , 2018 .

[34]  M. Scoble,et al.  Recovering waste heat from diesel generator exhaust; an opportunity for combined heat and power generation in remote Canadian mines , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[35]  S. Kær,et al.  Optimization of a thermoelectric generator subsystem for high temperature PEM fuel cell exhaust heat recovery , 2014 .

[36]  M. Rokni Design and analysis of a waste gasification energy system with solid oxide fuel cells and absorption chillers , 2017 .

[37]  Houcheng Zhang,et al.  Performance assessment of an integrated molten carbonate fuel cell-thermoelectric devices hybrid system for combined power and cooling purposes , 2017 .

[38]  Pouria Ahmadi,et al.  Multi-criteria optimization of an integrated energy system with thermoelectric generator, parabolic trough solar collector and electrolysis for hydrogen production , 2018 .

[39]  Selahatti̇n Göktun Optimal performance of an irreversible refrigerator With three heat sources (IRWTHS) , 1997 .

[40]  M. Radaideh,et al.  Advanced BWR criticality safety part I: Model development, model benchmarking, and depletion with uncertainty analysis , 2019, Progress in Nuclear Energy.

[41]  Xin Zhao,et al.  A review of durability test protocols of the proton exchange membrane fuel cells for vehicle , 2018, Applied Energy.

[42]  Félix Barreras,et al.  Remodeling of a commercial plug-in battery electric vehicle to a hybrid configuration with a PEM fuel cell , 2018, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.

[43]  T. Kwan,et al.  A coupled 3D electrochemical and thermal numerical analysis of the hybrid fuel cell-thermoelectric device system , 2018, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.

[44]  Guiling Wang,et al.  Direct carbon fuel cell: Fundamentals and recent developments , 2007 .

[45]  Fu Wang,et al.  Performance analyzes of an integrated phosphoric acid fuel cell and thermoelectric device system for power and cooling cogeneration , 2018 .

[46]  M. Radaideh,et al.  Criticality and uncertainty assessment of assembly misloading in BWR transportation cask , 2018 .

[47]  Urmila M. Diwekar,et al.  Characterization and quantification of uncertainty in solid oxide fuel cell hybrid power plants , 2005 .

[48]  Hiroshi Ito Economic and environmental assessment of phosphoric acid fuel cell-based combined heat and power system for an apartment complex , 2017 .

[49]  M. Radaideh,et al.  A new framework for sampling-based uncertainty quantification of the six-group reactor kinetic parameters , 2019, Annals of Nuclear Energy.

[50]  Ahmad Baroutaji,et al.  Comprehensive investigation on hydrogen and fuel cell technology in the aviation and aerospace sectors , 2019, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[51]  A. Dicks Molten carbonate fuel cells , 2004 .

[52]  Fu Wang,et al.  Performance evaluation of an integrated high-temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cell and absorption cycle system for power and heating/cooling cogeneration , 2019, Energy Conversion and Management.

[53]  Der-Tau Chin,et al.  On the conductivity of phosphoric acid electrolyte , 1989 .

[54]  B. Iooss,et al.  Global sensitivity analysis for a numerical model of radionuclide migration from the RRC “Kurchatov Institute” radwaste disposal site , 2008 .

[55]  Milinko Godjevac,et al.  A review of fuel cell systems for maritime applications , 2016 .

[56]  Frank P. Incropera,et al.  Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer , 1981 .

[57]  Werner Lehnert,et al.  Parameter extraction and uncertainty analysis of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell system based on Monte Carlo simulation , 2017 .

[58]  Christian Thiel,et al.  Analyzing potential lead markets for hydrogen fuel cell vehicles in Europe: Expert views and spatial perspective , 2013 .

[59]  G. Nolas,et al.  Apparatus for the measurement of electrical resistivity, Seebeck coefficient, and thermal conductivity of thermoelectric materials between 300 K and 12 K. , 2016, The Review of scientific instruments.

[60]  Jincan Chen,et al.  Optimum performance characteristics of an irreversible absorption refrigeration system , 1998 .

[61]  Wight,et al.  Estimating realistic confidence intervals for the activation energy determined from thermoanalytical measurements , 2000, Analytical chemistry.

[62]  M. Radaideh,et al.  Data-Driven and Precursor-Group Uncertainty Propagation of Lattice Kinetic Parameters in UAM Benchmark , 2019, Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations.

[63]  Amanda D. Smith,et al.  Incorporating performance-based global sensitivity and uncertainty analysis into LCOE calculations for emerging renewable energy technologies , 2018 .

[64]  D. Hamby A review of techniques for parameter sensitivity analysis of environmental models , 1994, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[65]  Max D. Morris,et al.  Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments , 1991 .

[66]  K. Agbossou,et al.  Characterization of a Ballard MK5-E Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Stack , 2001 .

[67]  R. Mark Ormerod Solid oxide fuel cells , 2003 .

[68]  H. Abaoud,et al.  Development of a 1 kW Phosphoric Acid Fuel Cell stack , 1998 .

[69]  Willy Charon,et al.  Effects of temperature uncertainty on the performance of a degrading PEM fuel cell model , 2009 .

[70]  A. Angelis-Dimakis,et al.  Exergetic, environmental and economic sustainability assessment of stationary Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells , 2018, Energy Conversion and Management.

[71]  Xiaohang Chen,et al.  Maximum power output and load matching of a phosphoric acid fuel cell-thermoelectric generator hybrid system , 2015 .

[72]  Ziyang Hu,et al.  Performance evaluation of an alkaline fuel cell/thermoelectric generator hybrid system , 2014 .

[73]  Shixue Wang,et al.  Performance analysis of automobile exhaust thermoelectric generator system with media fluid , 2018, Energy Conversion and Management.

[74]  Jincan Chen,et al.  Multi-objective optimisation analysis and load matching of a phosphoric acid fuel cell system , 2012 .

[75]  Pradip Majumdar,et al.  Fuel Cells , 2016 .

[76]  Ritobrata Sur,et al.  In Situ Measurements of Water Vapor Partial Pressure and Temperature Dynamics in a PEM Fuel Cell , 2010 .

[77]  Bje Bert Blocken,et al.  Review of external convective heat transfer coefficient models in building energy simulation programs: implementation and uncertainty , 2013 .

[78]  Liora Chana Coblentz Uncertainty analysis of heat exchangers , 2009 .

[79]  H. Gorgun,et al.  In situ simultaneous measurements of temperature and water partial pressure in a PEM fuel cell under steady state and dynamic cycling , 2006 .

[80]  Mamdouh El Haj Assad,et al.  Direct hydrocarbon fuel cells: A promising technology for improving energy efficiency , 2019, Energy.

[81]  M. Koukou,et al.  Predicting the effects of process parameters on the performance of phosphoric acid fuel cells using a 3-D numerical approach , 2006 .

[82]  Xiaoya Li,et al.  Configuration optimization of the segmented modules in an exhaust-based thermoelectric generator for engine waste heat recovery , 2018, Energy.

[83]  Yuewu Huang,et al.  Multi-Objective Optimization of Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell and Absorption Refrigerator Hybrid System , 2018 .

[84]  P. A. Newman,et al.  Approach for uncertainty propagation and robust design in CFD using sensitivity derivatives , 2001 .

[85]  H. Gabbar,et al.  Evaluation and optimization of thermoelectric generator network for waste heat utilization in nuclear power plants and non-nuclear energy applications , 2017 .

[86]  Ziyang Hu,et al.  Parametric study of a hybrid system integrating a phosphoric acid fuel cell with an absorption refrigerator for cooling purposes , 2016 .