Multicenter randomized controlled trial of the costs and effects of noninvasive diagnostic imaging in patients with peripheral arterial disease: the DIPAD trial.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of our study was to compare the costs and effects of three noninvasive imaging tests as the initial imaging test in the diagnostic workup of patients with peripheral arterial disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS Of 984 patients assessed for eligibility, 514 patients with peripheral arterial disease were randomized to MR angiography (MRA) or duplex sonography in three hospitals and to MRA or CT angiography (CTA) in one hospital. The outcome measures included the clinical utility, functional patient outcomes, quality of life, and actual diagnostic and therapeutic costs related to the initial imaging test during 6 months of follow-up. RESULTS With adjustment for potentially predictive baseline variables, the learning curve, and hospital setting, a significantly higher confidence and less additional imaging were found for MRA and CTA compared with duplex sonography. No statistically significant differences were found in improvement in functional patient outcomes and quality of life among the groups. The total costs were significantly higher for MRA and duplex sonography than for CTA. CONCLUSION The results suggest that both CTA and MRA are clinically more useful than duplex sonography and that CTA leads to cost savings compared with both MRA and duplex sonography in the initial imaging evaluation of peripheral arterial disease.

[1]  R. Rutherford,et al.  Management of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). TASC Working Group. TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC). , 2000, Journal of vascular surgery.

[2]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) , 1992 .

[3]  Arno W. Hoes,et al.  Peripheral arterial disease in the elderly: The Rotterdam Study. , 1998, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[4]  D. Moher,et al.  The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. , 2001, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[5]  C. Catalano,et al.  Infrarenal aortic and lower-extremity arterial disease: diagnostic performance of multi-detector row CT angiography. , 2004, Radiology.

[6]  M. Hunink,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic imaging work-up and treatment for patients with intermittent claudication in The Netherlands. , 2003, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[7]  Y. Graaf,et al.  Health-Related Quality of Life After Angioplasty and Stent Placement in Patients With Iliac Artery Occlusive Disease Results of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial , 1999 .

[8]  B. Dolmatch,et al.  Imaging peripheral arterial disease: a randomized controlled trial comparing contrast-enhanced MR angiography and multi-detector row CT angiography. , 2006, Perspectives in vascular surgery and endovascular therapy.

[9]  F. Gilbert,et al.  Evidence-based radiology: why and how? , 2009, European Radiology.

[10]  M A Koopmanschap,et al.  The friction cost method for measuring indirect costs of disease. , 1995, Journal of health economics.

[11]  M. Whiteley,et al.  Diagnosis of arterial disease of the lower extremities with duplex ultrasonography , 1996, British Journal of Surgery.

[12]  J. V. van Engelshoven,et al.  Peripheral vascular tree stenoses: evaluation with moving-bed infusion-tracking MR angiography. , 1998, Radiology.

[13]  P. Grenier,et al.  Diagnostic strategy for patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a prospective multicentre outcome study , 2002, The Lancet.

[14]  Y. van der Graaf,et al.  Health-related quality of life after angioplasty and stent placement in patients with iliac artery occlusive disease: results of a randomized controlled clinical trial. The Dutch Iliac Stent Trial Study Group. , 1999, Circulation.

[15]  K. A. Cullen,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous treatment of iliac artery occlusive disease in the United States. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  P. Bossuyt,et al.  Randomised comparisons of medical tests: sometimes invalid, not always efficient , 2000, The Lancet.

[17]  K. Lee,et al.  Clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction: should we adjust for baseline characteristics? , 2000, American heart journal.

[18]  L. Sharma,et al.  Leg symptoms in peripheral arterial disease: associated clinical characteristics and functional impairment. , 2001, JAMA.

[19]  D. Moher,et al.  The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials , 2001, The Lancet.

[20]  M. Gold.  Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine , 2016 .

[21]  J. V. van Engelshoven,et al.  Peripheral arterial disease: clinical and cost comparisons between duplex US and contrast- enhanced MR angiography-a multicenter randomized trial , 2017 .

[22]  F. Gilbert,et al.  Low back pain: influence of early MR imaging or CT on treatment and outcome--multicenter randomized trial. , 2004, Radiology.

[23]  F. Korosec,et al.  Time-resolved three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the peripheral vessels. , 2002, Radiology.

[24]  Gabriel P Krestin,et al.  Study design for concurrent development, assessment, and implementation of new diagnostic imaging technology. , 2002, Radiology.

[25]  J. Guralnik,et al.  The Ankle Brachial Index Is Associated with Leg Function and Physical Activity: The Walking and Leg Circulation Study , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[26]  T J Ulahannan,et al.  Decision Making in Health and Medicine: Integrating Evidence and Values , 2002 .

[27]  Ware J.E.Jr.,et al.  THE MOS 36- ITEM SHORT FORM HEALTH SURVEY (SF- 36) CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK AND ITEM SELECTION , 1992 .

[28]  W. Mali,et al.  Iliac arterial occlusive disease: cost-effectiveness analysis of stent placement versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Dutch Iliac Stent Trial Study Group. , 1998, Radiology.

[29]  Ahuva Engel,et al.  Multidetector CT angiography of peripheral vascular disease: a prospective comparison with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[30]  R. Kane,et al.  Methodology for measuring health-state preferences--II: Scaling methods. , 1989, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[31]  S. Pocock,et al.  Subgroup analysis, covariate adjustment and baseline comparisons in clinical trial reporting: current practiceand problems , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[32]  K. H. Tay,et al.  Multidetector CT angiography of the aortoiliac system and lower extremities: a prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[33]  S. Wildermuth,et al.  Aortoiliac and renal arteries: prospective intraindividual comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography and multi-detector row CT angiography. , 2003, Radiology.

[34]  Jan B Oostenbrink,et al.  Standardisation of costs: the Dutch Manual for Costing in economic evaluations. , 2002, PharmacoEconomics.

[35]  Thomas O. Staiger,et al.  Rapid magnetic resonance imaging vs radiographs for patients with low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. , 2003, JAMA.

[36]  T. Crayford,et al.  Developing the Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire: a new disease-specific quality of life measure for use in lower limb ischemia. , 2001, Journal of vascular surgery.

[37]  A. Kassner,et al.  Stepping-table gadolinium-enhanced digital subtraction MR angiography of the aorta and lower extremity arteries: preliminary experience. , 1999, Radiology.

[38]  Morgan E. Lim,et al.  Approaches for economic evaluations of health care technologies. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[39]  A. Whittemore.  Presidential address: a team for the 21st century: the vascular center. , 2000, Journal of vascular surgery.

[40]  P. Dolan,et al.  Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. , 1997, Medical care.

[41]  R. Rutherford,et al.  Recommended standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia: revised version. , 1997, Journal of vascular surgery.

[42]  J. V. van Engelshoven,et al.  Imaging peripheral arterial disease: a randomized controlled trial comparing contrast-enhanced MR angiography and multi-detector row CT angiography. , 2005, Radiology.

[43]  J. Oxtoby,et al.  Comparison of CT angiography with conventional arterial angiography in aortoiliac occlusive disease. , 2001, The British journal of radiology.

[44]  T. Stijnen,et al.  Peripheral arterial disease: therapeutic confidence of CT versus digital subtraction angiography and effects on additional imaging recommendations. , 2004, Radiology.

[45]  M. Hunink,et al.  Peripheral arterial disease: gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography versus color-guided duplex US--a meta-analysis. , 2000, Radiology.

[46]  C. Palmer,et al.  Evaluation of early abdominopelvic computed tomography in patients with acute abdominal pain of unknown cause: prospective randomised study , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.