Understanding government.direct

This article is concerned with developing a theoretical approach to understanding agendas for information age government, such as that set out in the British Government’s recent document, government.direct. It begins with showing why government.direct implies radical institutional change based on more flexible information flows less constrained by organizational boundaries. It then assesses the value of two prominent responses to the challenges offered by government.direct. It deals firstly with the problems posed by managerialist calls for reengineering the processes of government and then discusses the growing interest in ‘governance’, defined here as ‘the management of self-governing networks’. It argues that, to be truly helpful in understanding the demands of agendas such as government.direct, networking approaches to understanding governance must be refocused from a concern with policy level relationships between political actors onto issues involved in the merging of organizational and informational capabilities, capabilities which are, moreover, deeply embedded in existing institutional arrangements. The article concludes by suggesting a possible approach to analyzing the politics of information in government.

[1]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Business process re-engineering in theory and practice : business paradise regained? , 1995 .

[2]  Wendell Bell,et al.  The Third Wave. , 1982 .

[3]  Keith Dowding,et al.  Model or Metaphor? A Critical Review of the Policy Network Approach , 1995 .

[4]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through Information Technology , 1992 .

[5]  John Taylor,et al.  Don't obliterate, informate!: BPR for the information age , 1995 .

[6]  G. Vickers The Art of Judgment: A Study of Policy Making , 1995 .

[7]  Christine Bellamy,et al.  TRANSFORMING SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION FOR THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY: TOWARDS ONE-STOP SERVICES AND THE CLIENT GROUP PRINCIPLE? , 1996 .

[8]  R. Rhodes Control and Power in Central-local Government Relations , 2000 .

[9]  Grahame F. Thompson,et al.  Markets, Hierarchies and Networks: The Coordination of Social Life , 1991 .

[10]  R. Rhodes,et al.  The New Governance: Governing without Government , 1996 .

[11]  John A. Taylor,et al.  The ‘transformation game’: information systems and process innovation in organizations , 1994 .

[12]  Christine Bellamy,et al.  New information and communications technologies and institutional change , 1996 .

[13]  H. Willmott,et al.  NETWORKING AS KNOWLEDGE WORK: A STUDY OF STRATEGIC INTERORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE FINANCIAL SERVICES INDUSTRY* , 1993 .

[14]  K. Termeer,et al.  MANAGING NETWORKS IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR: A THEORETICAL STUDY OF MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES IN POLICY NETWORKS , 1995 .

[15]  H. Margetts The Automated State , 1995 .

[16]  D. Knights,et al.  Managers Divided: Organisation Politics and Information Technology Management , 1995 .

[17]  Vivien Lownpes VARIETIES OF NEW INSTITUTIONALISM: A CRITICAL APPRAISAL , 1996 .

[18]  T. P. Hughes,et al.  The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology , 1989 .

[19]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action , 1967 .