Design of an information volatility measure for health care decision making

Health care decision makers and researchers often use reporting tools (e.g. Online Analytical Processing (OLAP)) that present data aggregated from multiple medical registries and electronic medical records to gain insights into health care practices and to understand and improve patient outcomes and quality of care. An important limitation is that the data are usually displayed as point estimates without full description of the instability of the underlying data, thus decision makers are often unaware of the presence of outliers or data errors. To manage this problem, we propose an Information Volatility Measure (IVM) to complement business intelligence (BI) tools when considering aggregated data (intra-cell) or when observing trends in data (inter-cell). The IVM definitions and calculations are drawn from volatility measures found in the field of finance, since the underlying data in both arenas display similar behaviors. The presentation of the IVM is supplemented with three types of benchmarking to support improved user understanding of the measure: numerical benchmarking, graphical benchmarking, and categorical benchmarking. The IVM is designed and evaluated using exploratory and confirmatory focus groups.

[1]  Varghese S. Jacob,et al.  Assessing Data Quality for Information Products: Impact of Selection, Projection, and Cartesian Product , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[2]  M. Levine,et al.  Registries that show efficacy: good, but not good enough. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  Kevin B. Johnson,et al.  Categorizing the world of registries , 2008, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[4]  Edward F. McQuarrie,et al.  Focus Groups: Theory and Practice , 1991 .

[5]  James H Harrison,et al.  Regional and national health care data repositories. , 2008, Clinics in laboratory medicine.

[6]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[7]  Yu Cai,et al.  Supporting data quality management in decision-making , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[8]  Nicolette de Keizer,et al.  Model Formulation: Defining and Improving Data Quality in Medical Registries: A Literature Review, Case Study, and Generic Framework , 2002, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[9]  J Studnicki,et al.  Comparing alternative methods for composing community peer groups: a data warehouse application. , 2001, Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP.

[10]  L. Gaudette,et al.  Trends in breast cancer incidence and mortality. , 1996, Health reports.

[11]  Thomas J. Eggebraaten,et al.  A health-care data model based on the HL7 Reference Information Model , 2007, IBM Syst. J..

[12]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[13]  Donald P. Ballou,et al.  Modeling Data and Process Quality in Multi-Input, Multi-Output Information Systems , 1985 .

[14]  J. Allison Risk adjustment for measuring health care outcomes , 1996 .

[15]  Richard Y. Wang,et al.  An Object-Oriented Implementation of Quality Data Products , 1993 .

[16]  Mark R. Dambro,et al.  Assessing the quality of data entry in a computerized medical records system , 2004, Journal of Medical Systems.

[17]  J. Colby,et al.  The cost effectiveness of prenatal care in reducing low birth weight in New Hampshire. , 1989, Health services research.

[18]  Richard Y. Wang,et al.  Toward quality data: An attribute-based approach , 2014, Decis. Support Syst..

[19]  S. Chatterjee,et al.  Design Science Research in Information Systems , 2010 .

[20]  Keizo Sugimachi,et al.  Tumor size as a simple prognostic indicator for gastric carcinoma , 1997, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[21]  T. Sincich,et al.  Statistics for business and economics , 1978 .

[22]  Johnathan Mun,et al.  Real options analysis : tools and techniques for valuing strategic investments and decisions , 2012 .

[23]  L. Iezzoni Risk Adjustment for Measuring Healthcare Outcomes , 1994 .

[24]  Varghese S. Jacob,et al.  Assessing data quality for information products , 1999, ICIS.

[25]  Israel Nelken Volatility in the capital markets : State-of-the-art techniques for modeling, managing, and trading volatility , 1997 .

[26]  A. Pennisi,et al.  Evaluating the accuracy of transcribed computer-stored immunization data. , 1994, Pediatrics.

[27]  Rema Padman,et al.  Analyzing the Effect of Data Quality on the Accuracy of Clinical Decision Support Systems: A Computer Simulation Approach , 2006, AMIA.

[28]  Donald P. Ballou,et al.  Modeling Completeness versus Consistency Tradeoffs in Information Decision Contexts , 2003, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[29]  Monica Chiarini Tremblay,et al.  Doing more with more information: Changing healthcare planning with OLAP tools , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[30]  G. Shankaranarayan,et al.  Managing Data Quality in Dynamic Decision Environments: An Information Product Approach , 2003, J. Database Manag..

[31]  Veda C. Storey,et al.  A Framework for Analysis of Data Quality Research , 1995, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[32]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Anatomy of a Design Theory , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[33]  Lawrence A. Cunningham How To Think Like Benjamin Graham and Invest Like Warren Buffett , 2001 .

[34]  Mark E. Payton,et al.  Relationship between mean yield, coefficient of variation, mean square error, and plot size in wheat field experiments , 1999 .

[35]  C StoreyVeda,et al.  A Framework for Analysis of Data Quality Research , 1995 .

[36]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  10 Potholes in the Road to Information Quality , 1997, Computer.

[37]  Linda J Lux,et al.  Analysis of data-collection methods for an acute stroke care registry. , 2006, American journal of preventive medicine.

[38]  Richard Y. Wang,et al.  Modeling Information Manufacturing Systems to Determine Information Product Quality Management Scien , 1998 .

[39]  Ganesan Shankaranarayanan,et al.  Supporting data quality management in decision-making , 2006 .

[40]  W. Hogan,et al.  The accuracy of medication data in an outpatient electronic medical record. , 1996, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[41]  David Heath,et al.  Local volatility function models under a benchmark approach , 2006 .

[42]  ETA S. BERNER,et al.  Review Paper: Will the Wave Finally Break? A Brief View of the Adoption of Electronic Medical Records in the United States , 2004, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[43]  Charles Safran,et al.  Toward a national framework for the secondary use of health data: an American Medical Informatics Association White Paper. , 2007, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[44]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  The Catch data warehouse: support for community health care decision-making , 2003, Decision Support Systems.

[45]  L. McMillan,et al.  McMillan on Options , 1996 .

[46]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Focus Groups for Artifact Refinement and Evaluation in Design Research , 2010, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[47]  John Yen,et al.  Information Supply Chain: A Unified Framework for Information-Sharing , 2005, ISI.

[48]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[49]  Vijay K. Vaishnavi,et al.  Theory Development in Design Science Research: Anatomy of a Research Project , 2008 .

[50]  R A Deyo,et al.  Cost, controversy, crisis: low back pain and the health of the public. , 1991, Annual review of public health.

[51]  Michael M. Wagner,et al.  Review: Accuracy of Data in Computer-based Patient Records , 1997, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[52]  Richard Y. Wang,et al.  Data quality assessment , 2002, CACM.

[53]  Eta S. Berner,et al.  Viewpoint Paper: Informatics Challenges for the Impending Patient Information Explosion , 2005, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[54]  M. Coleman,et al.  Trends in breast cancer incidence, survival, and mortality , 2000, The Lancet.