A model for countergradient transport recently developed by us for one-dimensional freely propagatingturbulent premixed flames is extended here to the case of flames impinging on a wall. According to this approach the progress variable flux ρ u ″ c ″ ¯ is split into a gasdynamics (pressure-driven, countergradient) component and a turbulent (diffusive, gradient) one. The first component, which does not depend directly on turbulence, is estimated using a gasdynamics model based on the key assumption of constant reactant total pressure which, together with mass and momentum conservation, permits determination of the conditional velocities in reactant and product streams. The second component is estimated instead with the standard positive turbulent diffusion coefficient given by the k — ∈ model (independently of overall transport being of gradient or countergradient nature). The approach makes it possible to resolve the problem of countergradient transport without using empirical constants and for one-dimensional freely propagating flames to express the solution in analytical form. The model shows reasonable agreement with the experimental results when applied to a Bunsen-type open flame in the direction orthogonal to the flame front and to three impinging flames (for which the turbulent component of transport can be neglected). Impinging flames are the most critical for validation of the model as the wall counteracts the reduction of pressure across the flame connected with heat release. We show, in fact, here that the effect of the local difference between conditional pressures in the reactants and products streams due to the moving flamelets is not very significant in the open flame but becomes decisive in the impinging one. We demonstrate also that, in agreement with experimental data, countergradient, transport in our model strongly depends on the location of the flame relative to the wall (the closer the flame to thewall, the weaker the phenomenon).
[1]
Vladimir L. Zimont,et al.
Gradient, counter-gradient transport and their transition in turbulent premixed flames
,
2002
.
[2]
P. Libby,et al.
Premixed flames in stagnating turbulence part IV : A new theory for the Reynolds stresses and Reynolds fluxes applied to impinging flows
,
2000
.
[3]
Stephen B. Pope,et al.
TURBULENT PREMIXED FLAMES
,
1987
.
[4]
P. Libby,et al.
Premixed flames in stagnating turbulence part II. The mean velocities and pressure and the Damköhler number
,
1998
.
[5]
J. B. Moss,et al.
Turbulence Production in Premixed Turbulent Flames
,
1981
.
[6]
V. L. Zimont,et al.
Theory of turbulent combustion of a homogeneous fuel mixture at high reynolds numbers
,
1979
.
[7]
Vladimir L. Zimont,et al.
Modelling turbulent premixed combustion in the intermediate steady propagation regime
,
2001
.
[8]
F. Williams,et al.
Turbulent Reacting Flows
,
1981
.
[9]
Paul A. Libby,et al.
Countergradient Diffusion in Premixed Turbulent Flames
,
1981
.
[10]
V. L. Zimont,et al.
Gas premixed combustion at high turbulence. Turbulent flame closure combustion model
,
2000
.
[11]
Nedunchezhian Swaminathan,et al.
Interdependence of the Instantaneous Flame Front Structure and the Overall Scalar Flux in Turbulent Premixed Flames
,
1997
.
[12]
J. B. Moss,et al.
Simultaneous Measurements of Concentration and Velocity in an Open Premixed Turbulent Flame
,
1980
.
[13]
F. Williams,et al.
Experimental investigation of a premixed flame in an impinging turbulent stream
,
1994
.
[14]
R. Cheng,et al.
The influence of burner geometry on premixed turbulent flame propagation
,
1991
.
[15]
Robert W. Bilger,et al.
Measurements of conditional velocities in turbulent premixed flames by simultaneous OH PLIF and PIV
,
1999
.