Signal‐to‐noise in phase angle reconstruction: Dynamic range extension using phase reference offsets

The dynamic range of phase‐reconstructed magnetic resonance images is compared to that of magnitude‐reconstructed images. From analysis of propagation of errors, the phase angle noise is phase‐independent and given in radians by σ (|I|)/|I|, the noise‐to‐signal ratio of the corresponding magnitude‐reconstructed image. As the phase can range from minus π to π the phase angle dynamic range is 2π times that of the signal magnitude. These results agree with experiment, verifying that the noise in the two receiver channels is uncorrelated. An artifact‐free technique is presented for correcting phase spillover, which further extends the phase angle dynamic range. The reconstruction‐based reference phase is adjusted on a local basis so that the boundary of phase wraparound is reconstructed near the center of the [ − π, π] interval. For a particular flow study, the phase signal‐to‐noise was extended over twofold by spillover correction, to a value 15 times that of the magnitude signal‐to‐noise. © 1990 Academic Press, Inc.

[1]  D. Firmin,et al.  Measurement of Flow with NMR Imaging Using a Gradient Pulse and Phase Difference Technique , 1984, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[2]  Andrew A. Maudsley,et al.  Magnetic field measurement by NMR imaging , 1984 .

[3]  G M Bydder,et al.  MR Imaging: Clinical Use of the Inversion Recovery Sequence , 1985, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[4]  Further improvement of high‐speed NMR flow‐velocity measurement using a differential phase‐encoding technique , 1987, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  Jeremy W. R. Young.  Diagnostic Imaging in Surgery , 1987 .

[6]  J. Pauly,et al.  MR angiography by selective inversion recovery , 1987, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  A. Beth,et al.  Rapid local rectangular views and magnifications: Reduced phase encoding of orthogonally excited spin echoes , 1988, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  M. Bronskill,et al.  Noise and filtration in magnetic resonance imaging. , 1985, Medical physics.

[9]  P. R. Moran.  A flow velocity zeugmatographic interlace for NMR imaging in humans. , 1982, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[10]  D W Kormos,et al.  Separation of true fat and water images by correcting magnetic field inhomogeneity in situ. , 1986, Radiology.

[11]  W. Edelstein,et al.  A signal-to-noise calibration procedure for NMR imaging systems. , 1984, Medical physics.

[12]  R. Meuli,et al.  Projective imaging of pulsatile flow with magnetic resonance. , 1985, Science.

[13]  W. Hinshaw,et al.  Image formation by nuclear magnetic resonance: The sensitive‐point method , 1976 .

[14]  Z. H. Cho,et al.  Chemical‐shift imaging with large magnetic field inhomogeneity , 1987, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  B. Robinson,et al.  Computer-controlled pulsed electron-paramagnetic-resonance spectrometer , 1985 .

[16]  V. Wedeen,et al.  Projective MRI angiography and quantitative flow‐volume densitometry , 1986, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  Z H Cho,et al.  High‐resolution human in vivo spectroscopic imaging using echo‐ time encoding technique , 1986, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  R. Henkelman.  Measurement of signal intensities in the presence of noise in MR images. , 1985, Medical physics.

[19]  D. Norris,et al.  A new method of NMR flow imaging. , 1984, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  D. van Ormondt,et al.  Retrieval of frequencies, amplitudes, damping factors, and phases from time-domain signals using a linear least-squares procedure , 1985 .

[21]  B R Rosen,et al.  MR Velocity Imaging by Phase Display , 1985, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[22]  W. T. Dixon.  Simple proton spectroscopic imaging. , 1984, Radiology.

[23]  T. Conturo,et al.  Improved determination of spin density, T1 and T2 from a three-parameter fit to multiple-delay-multiple-echo (MDME) NMR images. , 1986, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  T E Conturo,et al.  Cooperative T1 and T2 effects on contrast using a new driven inversion spin‐echo (DISE) MRI pulse sequence , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  T E Conturo,et al.  AUR Memorial Award. Two computer models for selection of optimal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) pulse sequence timing. , 1984, Investigative radiology.

[26]  G M Bydder,et al.  The design of a multiple inversion recovery sequence for T1 measurement , 1987, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[27]  G. Bydder,et al.  Apparent changes of appearance of inversion‐recovery images , 1985, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[28]  P. Lauterbur,et al.  The sensitivity of the zeugmatographic experiment involving human samples , 1979 .

[29]  A. Crawley,et al.  Errors in T2 estimation using multislice multiple‐echo imaging , 1987, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[30]  A. Haase,et al.  Rapid NMR Imaging Using Low Flip-Angle Pulses , 2004 .

[31]  A new phase coding method using a slice selection gradient for high speed flow velocity measurement in NMR tomography , 1986 .

[32]  P A Bottomley,et al.  RF magnetic field penetration, phase shift and power dissipation in biological tissue: implications for NMR imaging. , 1978, Physics in medicine and biology.

[33]  P. Grenier,et al.  MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders. , 1986, Radiology.

[34]  L Kaufman,et al.  Inner volume MR imaging: technical concepts and their application. , 1985, Radiology.

[35]  S. Souza,et al.  Multiecho magnetic resonance angiography , 1987, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[36]  Alex D. Bain,et al.  Coherence levels and coherence pathways in NMR. A simple way to design phase cycling procedures , 1984 .

[37]  Proton chemical-shift imaging with non-uniform fields , 1986 .

[38]  David G. Gadian,et al.  The effect of magnetic susceptibility variations in NMR imaging and nmr spectroscopy in vivo , 1986 .