The relationships between learning outcomes and methods of teaching anatomy as perceived by medical students

The best method to teach anatomy continues to be widely debated. Many UK medical schools have recently changed their course structure with the use of cadaveric dissection declining. A recent study by Patel and Moxham ([ 2008 ] Clin. Anat. 21:182–189) found that professional anatomists viewed dissection to be the most suitable method to fulfil anatomical learning outcomes. The opinion of 580 second year medical students across two UK medical schools was surveyed. A methodology similar to that employed by Patel and Moxham ([ 2008 ] Clin. Anat. 21:182–189) aimed to explore which teaching methods students considered best to fulfil a prescribed set of anatomical learning outcomes. A total of 302 responses were returned (52%). Difference in students' opinion with regard to the teaching methods was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). A statistically significant agreement was found between the opinions of students from Imperial and Nottingham, and between the anatomists and the students, regarding the effectiveness of all teaching methods at meeting learning outcomes. Dissection was overall most “fit for purpose” in meeting learning outcomes, but no single teaching modality met all aspects of the curriculum. Dissection should remain a leading teaching modality in modern medical school anatomy courses. In addition to its role in the teaching of anatomy, it enables learning in a social context and holds broader learning opportunities to help future doctors best fulfill Good Medical Practice guidelines (General Medical Council, 2006 ). This, however, should be in the context of a multi‐modal approach to the teaching of anatomy. Clin. Anat. 24:489–497, 2011. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[2]  Deborah Caine,et al.  Back to the Basics , 2021, Interceram - International Ceramic Review.

[3]  Significance of the role of self‐study and group discussion , 1999, Clinical anatomy.

[4]  J. Shaw-dunn.  Follow the radical road: Comment on R. L. M. newell's paper , 1995, Clinical anatomy.

[5]  B. Moxham,et al.  Attitudes of professional anatomists to curricular change , 2005, Clinical anatomy.

[6]  H. Ellis.  Medico-legal Litigation and its Links with Surgical Anatomy , 2002 .

[7]  B. Moxham,et al.  The relationships between learning outcomes and methods of teaching anatomy as perceived by professional anatomists , 2008, Clinical anatomy.

[8]  R. Newell.  Follow the royal road: the case for dissection. , 1995, Clinical anatomy.

[9]  H. Goodwin.  Litigation and surgical practice in the UK , 2000, The British journal of surgery.

[10]  K. Brasel,et al.  Teaching anatomy with surgeons' tools: Use of the laparoscope in clinical anatomy , 2001, Clinical anatomy.

[11]  B. Turney,et al.  Anatomy in a modern medical curriculum. , 2007, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[12]  James H. Johnson,et al.  Importance of dissection in learning anatomy: Personal dissection versus peer teaching , 2002, Clinical anatomy.

[13]  M Utting,et al.  What future for dissection in courses of human topographical anatomy in universities in the UK? , 1995, Clinical anatomy.

[14]  H. Lempp,et al.  Perceptions of dissection by students in one medical school: beyond learning about anatomy. A qualitative study , 2005, Medical education.

[15]  J. McLachlan,et al.  Teaching anatomy without cadavers , 2004, Medical education.

[16]  C. E. Dinsmore,et al.  Teaching and learning gross anatomy: Dissection, prosection, or “both of the above?” , 1999, Clinical anatomy.

[17]  Peter Dangerfield,et al.  Learning gross anatomy in a clinical skills course , 2000, Clinical anatomy.

[18]  G. Cerri,et al.  The value of teaching sectional anatomy to improve CT scan interpretation , 2001, Clinical anatomy.

[19]  B. Hillen,et al.  Giving color to a new curriculum: Bodypaint as a tool in medical education , 2002, Clinical anatomy.

[20]  L. Batty,et al.  Undergraduate perspectives on the teaching and learning of anatomy * , 2009, ANZ journal of surgery.

[21]  M. Stringer,et al.  Modern approaches to teaching and learning anatomy , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[22]  Jeffrey T Laitman,et al.  The new face of gross anatomy , 2002, The Anatomical record.

[23]  Friedrich Paulsen,et al.  The dissection course - necessary and indispensable for teaching anatomy to medical students. , 2008, Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft.

[24]  A. Winkelmann,et al.  Anatomical dissection as a teaching method in medical school: a review of the evidence , 2007, Medical education.

[25]  J. Snape,et al.  Good medical practice , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[26]  E. Wenger.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[27]  H. Erden,et al.  Computed tomography and morphometry of the carpal canal in the dog. , 2003, Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft.

[28]  J. Fasel,et al.  A survival strategy for anatomy , 2005, The Lancet.

[29]  J R Skidmore,et al.  The case for prosection: Comment on R. L. M. newell's paper , 1995, Clinical anatomy.