Vorapaxar in patients with coronary artery bypass grafting: Findings from the TRA 2°P-TIMI 50 trial

Background: Vorapaxar is a first-in-class protease-activated receptor-1 antagonist indicated for the reduction of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in stable patients with prior atherothrombosis, who have not had a prior stroke or transient ischemic attack. The aims of this study were to investigate: 1) the role of vorapaxar in patients with severe coronary artery disease treated previously with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG); and 2) safety in patients undergoing CABG while receiving vorapaxar. Methods: TRA 2°P-TIMI 50 was a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of vorapaxar in 26,449 stable patients with prior atherothrombosis followed for a median of 30 months. We 1) investigated the efficacy of vorapaxar among patients with a history of CABG prior to randomization (n=2942); and 2) assessed the safety among 367 patients who underwent a new CABG during the trial. Results: Patients with a prior CABG were at higher risk for cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke at three years compared with patients without a prior CABG (13.7% vs. 7.8%, p<0.001). Among patients with a prior CABG, vorapaxar significantly reduced the risk of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (11.9% vs. 15.6%, hazard ratio 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.58–0.88, p=0.001; number-needed-to-treat = 27). In patients undergoing CABG while receiving vorapaxar, the rate of Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction CABG major bleeding was 6.3% vs. 4.1% with placebo (hazard ratio 1.53, 95% confidence interval 0.58–4.01, p=0.39). Conclusions: In patients with a prior CABG, vorapaxar significantly reduced the risk of recurrent major cardiovascular events. In patients undergoing CABG while receiving vorapaxar, bleeding risk appeared similar to that seen in the overall trial population.

[1]  Marc P. Bonaca,et al.  Acute Limb Ischemia and Outcomes With Vorapaxar in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease: Results From the Trial to Assess the Effects of Vorapaxar in Preventing Heart Attack and Stroke in Patients With Atherosclerosis–Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 50 (TRA2°P-TIMI 50) , 2016, Circulation.

[2]  V. Roger,et al.  Secondary prevention after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. , 2015, Circulation.

[3]  Marc P. Bonaca,et al.  Efficacy and Safety of Vorapaxar as Approved for Clinical Use in the United States , 2015, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[4]  Marc P. Bonaca,et al.  New ischemic stroke and outcomes with vorapaxar versus placebo: results from the TRA 2 °P-TIMI 50 trial. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  C. Held,et al.  Vorapaxar in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: subgroup analysis from the TRACER trial (Thrombin Receptor Antagonist for Clinical Event Reduction in Acute Coronary Syndrome). , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  Marc P. Bonaca,et al.  Vorapaxar for secondary prevention of thrombotic events for patients with previous myocardial infarction: a prespecified subgroup analysis of the TRA 2°P-TIMI 50 trial , 2012, The Lancet.

[7]  C. Vosa,et al.  Aspirin plus clopidogrel for optimal platelet inhibition following off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: results from the CRYSSA (prevention of Coronary arteRY bypaSS occlusion After off-pump procedures) randomised study , 2012, Heart.

[8]  G. Weerakkody,et al.  Mortality benefit with prasugrel in the TRITON-TIMI 38 coronary artery bypass grafting cohort: risk-adjusted retrospective data analysis. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  Marc P. Bonaca,et al.  Vorapaxar in the secondary prevention of atherothrombotic events. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  Janet S. Wright,et al.  2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesi , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  C. Held,et al.  Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: results from the PLATO (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) trial. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  T. Schuster,et al.  Enhanced Thrombin Generation After Cardiopulmonary Bypass Surgery , 2011, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[13]  Shengshou Hu,et al.  Aspirin plus clopidogrel therapy increases early venous graft patency after coronary artery bypass surgery a single-center, randomized, controlled trial. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  Marc P. Bonaca,et al.  Evaluation of a novel antiplatelet agent for secondary prevention in patients with a history of atherosclerotic disease: design and rationale for the Thrombin-Receptor Antagonist in Secondary Prevention of Atherothrombotic Ischemic Events (TRA 2 degrees P)-TIMI 50 trial. , 2009, American heart journal.

[15]  Marc P. Bonaca,et al.  SCH 530348: a novel oral thrombin receptor antagonist. , 2009, Future cardiology.

[16]  R. Colman,et al.  Thrombin during cardiopulmonary bypass. , 2006, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[17]  A. Leger,et al.  Protease-Activated Receptors in Cardiovascular Diseases , 2006, Circulation.

[18]  S. Chackalamannil Thrombin receptor (protease activated receptor-1) antagonists as potent antithrombotic agents with strong antiplatelet effects. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[19]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Benefits and Risks of the Combination of Clopidogrel and Aspirin in Patients Undergoing Surgical Revascularization for Non–ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: The Clopidogrel in Unstable angina to prevent Recurrent ischemic Events (CURE) Trial , 2004, Circulation.

[20]  W. Karzai,et al.  Aspirin and mortality from coronary bypass surgery. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  D. Mangano Aspirin and mortality from coronary bypass surgery. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  J. Loscalzo Vascular matrix and vein graft failure. Is the message in the medium? , 2000, Circulation.

[23]  S. Yoshitake,et al.  Antibody to thrombin receptor inhibits neointimal smooth muscle cell accumulation without causing inhibition of platelet aggregation or altering hemostatic parameters after angioplasty in rat. , 1998, Circulation research.

[24]  E J Topol,et al.  Aortocoronary saphenous vein graft disease: pathogenesis, predisposition, and prevention. , 1998, Circulation.

[25]  W J Keon,et al.  Coronary bypass graft fate and patient outcome: angiographic follow-up of 5,065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1,388 patients during 25 years. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[26]  B. Gersh Aspirin Plus Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin Alone After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: The Clopidogrel After Surgery for Coronary Artery Disease (CASCADE) Trial , 2012 .

[27]  R. Suri Outcomes Following Pre-Operative Clopidogrel Administration in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: The ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY) Trial , 2010 .