Modeling Soundscape Pleasantness Using perceptual Assessments and Acoustic Measurements Along Paths in Urban Context

Mapping the pleasantness of an urban environment is an alternative approach, closer to the city dweller's perception, than standardized sound levels cartography. This study reports on modeling pleasantness in urban context using perceptual assessments and sound measurements for specific locations during an urban walk. These assessments have been collected from four groups of approximately ten participants on 19 different assessment locations, along a 2.1 km-long path traveled in both directions. Simultaneously, 1/3-octave band sound levels and audio were recorded. Perceptual and physical models of pleasantness are proposed for specific locations based on multiple linear regressions. A multilevel analysis was performed, and it is shown that a perceptual model that includes perceived loudness joined to the perceived time of presence of traffic, voices and birds explains 90% of the pleasantness variance due to the sound environment variations. Physical models that include the original acoustic indicators that are most correlated with perceptual variables explain 85% of this variance. Thanks to these models, a unique averaged pleasantness value is defined for each assessment location from the perceptual or physical collected assessments. The Pearson's correlation coefficient between the averaged perceived pleasantness and the modeled values from perceptual assessment reaches r(19) = 0.98, and r(19) = 0.97, with the modeled values from physical measurements. These results make it possible to consider the use of this kind of models in a cartographic context. As the path was traveled in both directions, the presentation-order effect has also been assessed, and it has been found that path direction did not have a significant impact on the pleasantness assessment at specific locations, except when very strong sound environment changes occurred. Finally, the study gives some insights about the retrospective global pleasantness assessment for urban walks. For very short walks between two assessment locations, a recency effect is shown. Nevertheless, this effect doesn't seem to be significant when longer routes are assessed.

[1]  Pierre Aumond,et al.  Sound pleasantness evaluation of pedestrian walks in urban sound environments , 2016 .

[2]  B. Berglund,et al.  Annoyance and Spectral Contrast are Cues for Similarity and Preference of Sounds , 2002 .

[3]  T. Andringa,et al.  Understanding urban and natural soundscapes , 2011 .

[4]  Dick Botteldooren,et al.  Soundscape mapping in the urban context : A case study in Sheffield , 2015 .

[5]  G. Brambilla,et al.  Responses to noise in urban parks and in rural quiet areas , 2006 .

[6]  Dick Botteldooren,et al.  Exploring the use of mobile sensors for noise and black carbon measurements in an urban environment , 2012 .

[7]  Jian Kang,et al.  Soundscape descriptors and a conceptual framework for developing predictive soundscape models , 2016 .

[8]  R. Venkatesha Prasad,et al.  Comparison of voice activity detection algorithms for VoIP , 2002, Proceedings ISCC 2002 Seventh International Symposium on Computers and Communications.

[9]  Vincent Abiodun Micheal,et al.  Estimation of Regression Coefficients in the Presence of Multicollinearity , 2014 .

[10]  Bert De Coensel,et al.  Effects of natural sounds on the perception of road traffic noise. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  S. Kuwano,et al.  Continuous judgment of level-fluctuating sounds and the relationship between overall loudness and instantaneous loudness , 1985, Psychological research.

[12]  Samantha Windflower Assessment and management of environmental noise , 2014 .

[13]  Catherine Marquis-Favre,et al.  Road Traffic in Urban Areas: A Perceptual and Cognitive Typology of Pass-By Noises , 2012 .

[14]  Jan Grabowski,et al.  Noise map validation by continuous noise monitoring , 2011 .

[15]  Bert De Coensel,et al.  INFLUENCE OF TEMPORAL STRUCTURE OF THE SONIC ENVIRONMENT ON ANNOYANCE , 2023, International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem (ICBEN) 2011.

[16]  Kirill V. Horoshenkov,et al.  Predicting Perceived Tranquillity in Urban Parks and Open Spaces , 2011 .

[17]  Catherine Lavandier,et al.  Measurements of acoustic environments for urban soundscapes: choice of homogeneous periods, optimization of durations, and selection of indicators. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  V. Gómez Escobar,et al.  Relationship between objective acoustic indices and subjective assessments for the quality of soundscapes , 2015 .

[19]  Mostafa Refat Ismail,et al.  Sound preferences of the dense urban environment: Soundscape of Cairo , 2014 .

[20]  B. Berglund,et al.  A principal components model of soundscape perception. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  N. Jaspen Applied Nonparametric Statistics , 1979 .

[22]  C. Lavandier,et al.  Influence of visual setting on sound ratings in an urban environment , 2002 .

[23]  B. Berglund,et al.  Soundscape quality in suburban green areas and city parks. , 2006 .

[24]  Paulo Henrique Trombetta Zannin,et al.  Characterization of environmental noise based on noise measurements, noise mapping and interviews: A case study at a university campus in Brazil , 2013 .

[25]  J. Steffens,et al.  Trend Effects in Momentary and Retrospective Soundscape Judgments , 2015 .

[26]  C. Lavandier,et al.  The contribution of sound source characteristics in the assessment of urban soundscapes , 2006 .

[27]  Arnaud Can,et al.  Measurement network for urban noise assessment: Comparison of mobile measurements and spatial interpolation approaches , 2014 .

[28]  John B. Shoven,et al.  I , Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal.

[29]  D. Botteldooren,et al.  19th INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON ACOUSTICS MADRID, 2-7 SEPTEMBER 2007 ACOUSTIC INDICATORS OF SOUNDSCAPE QUALITY AND NOISE ANNOYANCE IN OUTDOOR URBAN AREAS , 2007 .

[30]  Maria E. Niessen,et al.  NoiseTube: Measuring and mapping noise pollution with mobile phones , 2009, ITEE.

[31]  Peter Lundén,et al.  Similarity and pleasantness assessments of water-fountain sounds recorded in urban public spaces. , 2015, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  Jin Yong Jeon,et al.  Non-auditory factors affecting urban soundscape evaluation. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  Miss A.O. Penney (b) , 1974, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[34]  A. Can,et al.  Noise Indicators to Diagnose Urban Sound Environments at Multiple Spatial Scales , 2015 .

[35]  M. Nilsson Soundscape quality in urban open spaces , 2007 .

[36]  Bert De Coensel,et al.  Soundscape quality indicators for city parks, the Antwerp case study , 2014 .

[37]  V K Irmer,et al.  Die EG-Richtlinie zur Bewertung und Bekaempfung von Umgebungslaerm / The European Directive relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise , 2002 .

[38]  Jian Kang,et al.  Factors influencing the sound preference in urban open spaces , 2010 .

[39]  Prediction and explanation of sound quality indicators by multiple linear regressions and artificial neural networks , 2012 .

[40]  Pyoung Jik Lee,et al.  Perceptual assessment of quality of urban soundscapes with combined noise sources and water sounds. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[41]  Catherine Lavandier,et al.  Sound quality indicators for urban places in Paris cross-validated by Milan data. , 2015, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  D. Botteldooren,et al.  The quiet rural soundscape and how to characterize it , 2006 .

[43]  Catherine Lavandier,et al.  AMBIENT SOUND ASSESSMENT OF URBAN ENVIRONMENTS: FIELD STUDIES IN TWO FRENCH CITIES , 2003 .

[44]  Catherine Lavandier,et al.  Influence of loudness of noise events on perceived sound quality in urban context , 2014 .

[45]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.