Accounting for Geographic Variation in Social Security Disability Program Participation

There is wide geographic variation in Social Security Disability Insurance (DI) and Supplementary Security Income (SSI) participation across the United States. The authors describe the variation. Using data from Social Security Administration reports and results from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey, the authors decompose the geographic variation in program participation into component parts including variation in disability prevalence and variation in program participation among working-age persons with disabilities. The variation in participation among persons with disabilities is further decomposed into socioeconomic subcomponents.

[1]  A. Henry,et al.  Accounting for Geographic Variation in DI and SSI Participation , 2016 .

[2]  Jeffrey B. Liebman Understanding the Increase in Disability Insurance Benefit Receipt in the United States. , 2015, The journal of economic perspectives : a journal of the American Economic Association.

[3]  Matthew S. Rutledge,et al.  WHY DO SSI AND SNAP ENROLLMENTS RISE IN GOOD ECONOMIC TIMES AND BAD , 2014 .

[4]  Yonatan Ben-Shalom,et al.  National and State Program Participation Ratios for Working-Age People with Disabilities , 2014 .

[5]  A. Houtenville,et al.  Capturing the Elusive Working-Age Population With Disabilities , 2014 .

[6]  H. Waldron,et al.  Growth in New Disabled-Worker Entitlements, 1970–2008 , 2013 .

[7]  Kathleen J. Mullen,et al.  Disability Insurance and Healthcare Reform: Evidence from Massachusetts , 2013 .

[8]  Jonathan A. Schwabish,et al.  The future of Social Security Disability Insurance , 2013 .

[9]  K. Rupp Factors Affecting Initial Disability Allowance Rates for the Disability Insurance and Supplemental Security Income Programs: The Role of the Demographic and Diagnostic Composition of Applicants and Local Labor Market Conditions , 2012, Social security bulletin.

[10]  Nikolaos Theodoropoulos,et al.  Immigrant Networks and the Take-Up of Disability Programs: Evidence from US Census Data , 2012, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[11]  John F. Burton, Jr.,et al.  The Growth in Applications for Social Security Disability Insurance: A Spillover Effect from Workers’ Compensation , 2012, Social security bulletin.

[12]  Norma B Coe,et al.  What Explains State Variation in SSDI Application Rates? , 2011 .

[13]  Matthew S. Rutledge The Impact of Unemployment Insurance Extensions on Disability Insurance Application and Allowance Rates , 2011 .

[14]  Giovanni Mastrobuoni,et al.  The political economy of the disability insurance: theory and evidence of gubernatorial learning , 2007 .

[15]  D. McVicar Why do disability benefit rolls vary between regions? A review of the evidence from the USA and the UK , 2006 .

[16]  Lael R. Keiser,et al.  Institute for Research on Poverty Discussion Paper no. 1292-05 The Political Roots of Disability Claims: How State Environments and Policies Shape Citizen Demands , 2005 .

[17]  David H. Autor,et al.  The Rise in the Disability Rolls and the Decline in Unemployment , 2003 .

[18]  D. Black,et al.  The Impact of Economic Conditions on Participation in Disability Programs: Evidence from the Coal Boom and Bust. , 2002, The American economic review.

[19]  Lael R. Keiser Street-level Bureaucrats, Administrative Power and the Manipulation of Federal Social Security Disability Programs , 2001, State Politics & Policy Quarterly.

[20]  J. S. Butler,et al.  How policy variables influence the timing of applications for Social Security Disability Insurance. , 2001, Social security bulletin.

[21]  D. Stapleton,et al.  Determinants of the growth in the Social Security Administration's disability programs--an overview. , 1995, Social security bulletin.

[22]  Nelson Wj Disability trends in the United States: a national and regional perspective. , 1994 .

[23]  J. L. Mccoy,et al.  Geographic patterns of disability in the United States. , 1994, Social security bulletin.

[24]  Erica M.WOEHL SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION DISABILITY DISCREPANCIES: THE DEBATE BETWEEN STREET-LEVEL BUREAUCRATS AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES , 2022 .