Aiming at absolute force calibration of optical tweezers, following a critical review of proposed theoretical models, we present and test the results of Mie-Debye-spherical aberration (MDSA) theory, an extension of a previous (MD) model, taking account of spherical aberration at the glass-water interface. This first-principles theory is formulated entirely in terms of experimentally accessible parameters (none adjustable). Careful experimental tests of the MDSA theory, undertaken at two laboratories, with very different setups, are described. A detailed description is given of the procedures employed to measure laser beam waist, local beam power at the transparent microspheres trapped by the tweezers, microsphere radius, and the trap transverse stiffness, as a function of radius and height in the (inverted microscope) sample chamber. We find generally very good agreement with MDSA theory predictions, for a wide size range, from the Rayleigh domain to large radii, including the values most often employed in practice, and at different chamber heights, both with objective overfilling and underfilling. The results asymptotically approach geometrical optics in the mean over size intervals, as they should, and this already happens for size parameters not much larger than unity. MDSA predictions for the trapping threshold, position of stiffness peak, stiffness variation with height, multiple equilibrium points, and "hopping" effects among them are verified. Remaining discrepancies are ascribed to focus degradation, possibly arising from objective aberrations in the infrared, not yet included in MDSA theory.
[1]
Herch Moyses Nussenzveig.
Diffraction Effects in Semiclassical Scattering
,
1992
.
[2]
P. A. Maia Neto,et al.
Theory of trapping forces in optical tweezers
,
2003,
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.
[3]
Jun Q. Lu,et al.
Determination of complex refractive index of polystyrene microspheres from 370 to 1610 nm
,
2003,
Physics in medicine and biology.
[4]
Z. Kam,et al.
Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles
,
1998
.
[5]
C. Sheppard,et al.
Effects of specimen refractive index on confocal imaging
,
1997
.
[6]
N. B. Viana,et al.
In situ measurement of laser power at the focus of a high numerical aperture objective using a microbolometer
,
2002
.
[7]
Dynamic light scattering from an optically trapped microsphere.
,
2002,
Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.
[8]
A. R. Edmonds.
Angular Momentum in Quantum Mechanics
,
1957
.
[9]
M. Schliwa,et al.
Calibration of light forces in optical tweezers.
,
1995,
Applied optics.
[10]
H. L. Dryden,et al.
Investigations on the Theory of the Brownian Movement
,
1957
.
[11]
E. Wolf,et al.
Electromagnetic diffraction in optical systems, II. Structure of the image field in an aplanatic system
,
1959,
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.