Branching innovation, recombinant innovation, and endogenous technological transitions

We propose a model of technological transitions based on two different types of innovations. Branching innovations refer to technological improvements along a particular path, while recombinant innovations represent fusions of multiple paths. Recombinant innovations create “short-cuts” which reduce switching costs allowing agents to escape a technological lock-in. As a result, recombinant innovations speed up technological progress allowing transitions that are impossible with only branching innovations. Our model replicates some stylised facts of technological change, such as technological lock-in, experimental failure, punctuated change and irreversibility. Furthermore, an extensive simulation experiment suggests that there is an optimal rate of innovation, which is strongly correlated with the number of recombination innovations. This underlines the pivotal role of technological variety as a seed for recombinant innovation leading to technological transitions.

[1]  Melissa A. Schilling,et al.  Recombinant Search and Breakthrough Idea Generation: An Analysis of High Impact Papers in the Social Sciences , 2011 .

[2]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  The Theory of Economic Development , 2017 .

[3]  Magnus Enquist,et al.  Modelling the evolution and diversity of cumulative culture , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  J. Bergh.  Optimal Diversity: Increasing Returns versus Recombinant Innovation , 2008 .

[5]  Jean-Michel Dalle,et al.  Sequential problem choice and the reward system in Open Science , 2007 .

[6]  Raghu Garud,et al.  Path Dependence or Path Creation? , 2010 .

[7]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  A Percolation Model of Innovation in Complex Technology Spaces , 2002 .

[8]  L. Fleming.  Recombinant Uncertainty in Technological Search Lee Fleming , 2001 .

[9]  Werner Ebeling,et al.  Nonlinear stochastic effects of substitution — an evolutionary approach , 1996 .

[10]  P. David.  Clio and the Economics of QWERTY , 1985 .

[11]  D. North.  Competing Technologies , Increasing Returns , and Lock-In by Historical Events , 1994 .

[12]  Raghu Garud,et al.  Path Creation as a Process of Mindful Deviation , 2013 .

[13]  Fernando Vega-Redondo,et al.  Technological change and path dependence: a co-evolutionary model on a directed graph , 1994 .

[14]  Koen Frenken,et al.  Variety and niche creation in aircraft, helicopters, motorcycles and microcomputers , 1999 .

[15]  O. Sorenson,et al.  Technology as a complex adaptive system: evidence from patent data , 2001 .

[16]  Peter Lewin,et al.  Economics of QWERTY , 2001 .

[17]  Paolo Zeppini,et al.  Competing Recombinant Technologies for Environmental Innovation: Extending Arthur's Model of Lock-In , 2011 .