What Makes Plan Implementation Successful? An Evaluation of Local Plans and Implementation Practices in New Zealand

Failure to implement plans has long been considered a significant barrier to effective planning. We examine two conceptions of success in plan implementation (conformance and performance), the effects of the implementation practices of planning agencies, and the capacity of agencies and permit applicants to bring about success. A key lesson from our New-Zealand-based evaluation is that implementation is somewhat weak. Another key point is that, if implementation is defined and measured in terms of conformance, plans and planners have an important influence on implementation success. Alternatively, if implementation is defined and measured in terms of performance, plans and planners are less influential in implementation. These lessons have broad implications for the theory and practice of plan implementation.

[1]  John T. Scholz.  Cooperative Regulatory Enforcement and the Politics of Administrative Effectiveness , 1991, American Political Science Review.

[2]  Timothy Beatley,et al.  Influences on Local Adoption of Planning Measures for Earthquake Hazard Mitigation , 1989 .

[3]  Rachelle Alterman,et al.  Implementation of Urban Land Use Plans , 1978 .

[4]  Arthur Christian Nelson,et al.  Plan Quality and Mitigating Damage from Natural Disasters: A Case Study of the Northridge Earthquake with Planning Policy Considerations , 2002 .

[5]  A. Gilg,et al.  The Delivery of Planning Policy in Great Britain: Explaining the Implementation Gap. New Evidence from a Case Study in Rural England , 1997 .

[6]  Melville T. Pountney,et al.  Aspects of Development Control, Part I: The Relationship with Local Plans , 1983 .

[7]  Margaret A. Anderson.  PLANNING POLICIES AND DEVELOPMENT CONTROL IN THE SUSSEX DOWNS AONB , 1981 .

[8]  D I Brotherton,et al.  On the Control of Development by Planning Authorities , 1992 .

[9]  R. Deyle,et al.  Local Government Compliance with State Planning Mandates: The Effects of State Implementation in Florida , 1998 .

[10]  Philip Berke,et al.  Evaluating Plan Implementation: A Conformance-Based Methodology , 2004 .

[11]  Emily Talen,et al.  After the Plans: Methods to Evaluate the Implementation Success of Plans , 1996 .

[12]  John Forester,et al.  Planning In the Face of Conflict: Negotiation and Mediation Strategies in local Land Use Regulation , 1987 .

[13]  P. Berke,et al.  The Influence of State Planning Mandates on Local Plan Quality , 1994 .

[14]  Robert A. Johnston,et al.  The Growth Phasing Program of Sacramento County , 1978 .

[15]  Melville T. Pountney,et al.  Aspects of Development Control, Part 2: The Applicant's View , 1983 .

[16]  Judith E. Innes,et al.  Information in Communicative Planning , 1998 .

[17]  Kenneth F. Warren.  Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington Are Dashed in Oakland; Or Why It's Amazing That Federal Programs Work at All . By Jeffrey L. Pressman and Aaron B. Wildavsky. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973. Pp. xviii, 182. $7.50.) , 1974 .

[18]  L. D. Hopkins,et al.  Urban Development: The Logic Of Making Plans , 2001 .

[19]  R. Johnston,et al.  SUCCESSFUL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION: THE GROWTH PHASING PROGRAM OF SACRAMENTO COUNTY , 1978 .

[20]  Paul A. Sabatier,et al.  Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches to Implementation Research: a Critical Analysis and Suggested Synthesis , 1986, Journal of Public Policy.

[21]  H Mastop,et al.  Performance in Dutch Spatial Planning: An Introduction , 1997 .

[22]  Patsy Healey,et al.  The Communicative Work of Development Plans , 1993 .

[23]  Raymond J. Burby,et al.  Improving Compliance with Regulations: Choices and Outcomes for Local Government , 1998 .

[24]  Lewis D. Hopkins,et al.  Do Plans Matter? , 2001 .

[25]  S. Adler,et al.  The Politics of Implementation , 2001 .

[26]  E R Alexander,et al.  Planning and Plan Implementation: Notes on Evaluation Criteria , 1989 .

[27]  G. I. Balch.  THE STICK, THE CARROT, AND OTHER STRATEGIES: A Theoretical Analysis of Governmental Intervention , 1980 .

[28]  Paul McNamara,et al.  "Commentary". The limitations of development control data in planning research: a comment or Ian Brotherton's recent study , 1984 .

[29]  P. Berke,et al.  What drives plan implementation? Plans, planning agencies and developers , 2004 .

[30]  Raymond J. Burby,et al.  Making Sense Out of Regulatory Enforcement , 1998 .

[31]  Andreas Faludi,et al.  Evaluation of Strategic Plans: The Performance Principle , 1997 .

[32]  E. Talen,et al.  Making the Good Easy: The Smart Code Alternative , 2002 .

[33]  Gary G. Rudholm,et al.  The Limits of Regulation Evidence from Local Plan Implementation in California , 1989 .

[34]  M. Goggin,et al.  Implementation Theory and Practice: Toward a Third Generation , 1990, American Political Science Review.

[35]  Emily Talen,et al.  Do Plans Get Implemented? A Review of Evaluation in Planning , 1996 .

[36]  P. Berke,et al.  Do Cooperative Environmental Planning Mandates Produce Good Plans? Empirical Results from the New Zealand Experience , 1999 .

[37]  R. Burby.  Making Plans that Matter: Citizen Involvement and Government Action , 2003 .

[38]  R. Burby,et al.  Mandates, Plans, and Planners: Building Local Commitment to Development Management , 1994 .

[39]  P. Berke,et al.  Planning and Indigenous People , 2002 .

[40]  Mark Seasons,et al.  Monitoring and Evaluation in Municipal Planning: Considering the Realities , 2003 .

[41]  Susan M. Barrett,et al.  Policy and action : essays on the implementation of public policy , 1981 .

[42]  Daniel A. Mazmanian,et al.  A Multivariate Model of Public Policy-Making , 1980 .

[43]  William C. Baer,et al.  General Plan Evaluation Criteria: An Approach to Making Better Plans , 1997 .