Multifidelity Sparse-Grid-Based Uncertainty Quantification for the Hokkaido Nansei-oki Tsunami

With uncertainty quantification, we aim to efficiently propagate the uncertainties in the input parameters of a computer simulation, in order to obtain a probability distribution of its output. In this work, we use multi-fidelity sparse grid interpolation to propagate the uncertainty in the shape of the incoming wave for the Okushiri test-case, which is a wave tank model of a part of the 1993 Hokkaido Nansei-oki tsunami. An important issue with many uncertainty quantification approaches is the ‘curse of dimensionality’: the overall computational cost of the uncertainty propagation increases rapidly when we increase the number of uncertain input parameters. We aim to mitigate the curse of dimensionality by using a multifidelity approach. In the multifidelity approach, we combine results from a small number of accurate and expensive high-fidelity simulations with a large number of less accurate but also less expensive low-fidelity simulations. For the Okushiri test-case, we find an improved scaling when we increase the number of uncertain input parameters. This results in a significant reduction of the overall computational cost. For example, for four uncertain input parameters, accurate uncertainty quantification based on only high-fidelity simulations comes at a normalised cost of 219 high-fidelity simulations; when we use a multifidelity approach, this is reduced to a normalised cost of only 10 high-fidelity simulations.

[1]  Hester Bijl,et al.  Speeding up Kriging through fast estimation of the hyperparameters in the frequency-domain , 2013, Comput. Geosci..

[2]  Leo Wai-Tsun Ng,et al.  Multifidelity Uncertainty Quantification Using Non-Intrusive Polynomial Chaos and Stochastic Collocation , 2012 .

[3]  Hans-Joachim Bungartz,et al.  Acta Numerica 2004: Sparse grids , 2004 .

[4]  K. A. Cliffe,et al.  Multilevel Monte Carlo methods and applications to elliptic PDEs with random coefficients , 2011, Comput. Vis. Sci..

[5]  Michael Griebel,et al.  Sparse Grids and Applications , 2012 .

[6]  Stephen Roberts,et al.  Hydrodymamic modelling of coastal inundation , 2005 .

[7]  Michael S. Eldred,et al.  Multi-Fidelity Uncertainty Quantification: Application to a Vertical Axis Wind Turbine Under an Extreme Gust , 2014 .

[8]  H. Bungartz,et al.  Sparse grids , 2004, Acta Numerica.

[9]  Thomas J. Santner,et al.  The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments , 2003, Springer Series in Statistics.

[10]  Omar M. Knio,et al.  Uncertainty quantification and inference of Manning's friction coefficients using DART buoy data during the Tōhoku tsunami , 2014 .

[11]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Predicting the output from a complex computer code when fast approximations are available , 2000 .

[12]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Metamodeling in Multidisciplinary Design Optimization: How Far Have We Really Come? , 2014 .

[13]  Alexander I. J. Forrester,et al.  Multi-fidelity optimization via surrogate modelling , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[14]  Hans-Joachim Bungartz,et al.  Higher Order Quadrature on Sparse Grids , 2004, International Conference on Computational Science.

[15]  Jochen Garcke,et al.  Sparse Grids in a Nutshell , 2012 .

[16]  Michael Griebel,et al.  A combination technique for the solution of sparse grid problems , 1990, Forschungsberichte, TU Munich.

[17]  N. Metropolis,et al.  The Monte Carlo method. , 1949 .

[18]  J Behrens,et al.  New computational methods in tsunami science , 2015, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[19]  Serge Guillas,et al.  Sequential Design with Mutual Information for Computer Experiments (MICE): Emulation of a Tsunami Model , 2014, SIAM/ASA J. Uncertain. Quantification.

[20]  Brendan Harding,et al.  A GRADIENT-ENHANCED SPARSE GRID ALGORITHM FOR UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION , 2015 .

[21]  Riccardo Pellegrini,et al.  A multi-fidelity adaptive sampling method for metamodel-based uncertainty quantification of computer simulations , 2016 .

[22]  Leo Wai-Tsun Ng,et al.  Multifidelity approaches for optimization under uncertainty , 2014 .

[23]  David J. J. Toal,et al.  Some considerations regarding the use of multi-fidelity Kriging in the construction of surrogate models , 2015 .

[24]  A. Sarri,et al.  Statistical emulation of a tsunami model for sensitivity analysis and uncertainty quantification , 2012, 1203.6297.

[25]  Thomas J. Santner,et al.  Design and analysis of computer experiments , 1998 .

[26]  N. Vayatis,et al.  Can small islands protect nearby coasts from tsunamis? An active experimental design approach , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[27]  F Dias,et al.  Statistical emulation of landslide-induced tsunamis at the Rockall Bank, NE Atlantic , 2017, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[28]  Leo Wai-Tsun Ng,et al.  Monte Carlo Information-Reuse Approach to Aircraft Conceptual Design Optimization Under Uncertainty , 2016 .

[29]  Omar Ghattas,et al.  From SIAM News , Volume 43 , Number 10 , December 2010 Computer Predictions with Quantified Uncertainty , Part II , 2010 .

[30]  Richard P. Dwight,et al.  Uncertainty quantification for a sailing yacht hull, using multi-fidelity kriging , 2015 .