The effect of task type on fundamental frequency in children.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of task type on the fundamental frequency (F(0)) produced by young children. Fundamental frequency is a parameter which describes the rate of vocal fold vibration. The influence of task type on F(0) values is important for health professionals designing and implementing assessment protocols for children with voice disorders. METHODS Forty-eight healthy children between the ages of 5.0 and 7.11 years were evaluated in this study. Each child completed four tasks used to elicit a voice sample for subsequent analysis of F(0). The tasks included: (a) sustaining the vowel/a/(Vowel), (b) sustaining the vowel embedded in a word at the end of a phrase (Phrase), (c) repeating a sentence (Sentence), and (d) counting from 1 to 10 (Counting). Each child was evaluated by one of two clinicians who had an equal number of years of training and were the same age and gender. RESULTS A repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to examine the influence of task type on F(0) values. The results revealed a significant difference in F(0) between the four elicitation tasks (p=.002). Pair wise comparisons revealed that Counting elicited higher F(0) values compared to Phrase (p=.018) and Sentence tasks (p=.001). There were no significant interaction effects for task by age, gender, or clinician who evaluated the child (p>.05). CONCLUSIONS The results of this study revealed that task type does significantly influence F(0) values in young children. This finding is clinically important as it indicates that the same task should be used to monitor changes in the voice over time in relationship to surgical or behavioral interventions.

[1]  J. Stemple Voice therapy : clinical studies , 1993 .

[2]  Ronald J. Baken,et al.  Clinical measurement of speech and voice , 1987 .

[3]  W. Zemlin Speech and Hearing Science : Anatomy and Physiology , 1968 .

[4]  L. Brodsky,et al.  Management of voice disorders in children , 2000 .

[5]  R. Shrivastav,et al.  The role of cognitive cueing in eliciting vocal variability. , 2000, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[6]  S N Awan,et al.  Speaking fundamental frequency characteristics of white, African American, and Hispanic kindergartners. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[7]  J. Harden,et al.  Duration of sustained phonation in kindergarten children. , 1984, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[8]  G. Niedzielska Acoustic analysis in the diagnosis of voice disorders in children. , 2001, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[9]  Raymond H. Colton,et al.  Understanding Voice Problems , 1990 .

[10]  平野 実 Clinical examination of voice , 1981 .

[11]  Joseph C. Stemple,et al.  Clinical Voice Pathology: Theory and Management , 1984 .

[12]  J Sundberg,et al.  Data on subglottal pressure and SPL at varied vocal loudness and pitch in 8- to 11-year-old children. , 1998, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[13]  平野 実,et al.  Understanding Voice Problems: A Physiological Perspective for Diagnosis and Treatment , 1996 .

[14]  J Kreiman,et al.  Comparison of voice analysis systems for perturbation measurement. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[15]  Neck Surgery,et al.  The Use of Voice Therapy in the Treatment , 2005 .

[16]  B. Weinrich,et al.  Aerodynamic measurements: normative data for children ages 6:0 to 10:11 years. , 2005, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[17]  P. Milenkovic,et al.  Acoustic characteristics of children's voice , 1988 .

[18]  A. Reich,et al.  Factors influencing fundamental frequency range estimates in children. , 1989, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[19]  Rick M Roark,et al.  Frequency and voice: perspectives in the time domain. , 2006, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[20]  J C Montague,et al.  The effect of task on determination of habitual pitch. , 2000, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[21]  D. Bless,et al.  Attitudes of children with dysphonia. , 2008, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[22]  Eric J Hunter,et al.  A comparison of a child's fundamental frequencies in structured elicited vocalizations versus unstructured natural vocalizations: a case study. , 2009, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[23]  R. Zraick,et al.  The effect of task on determination of maximum phonational frequency range. , 2000, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[24]  B Weinberg,et al.  Speaking fundamental frequency characteristics of five- and six-year-old children with mongolism. , 1970, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[25]  H. Hoffman,et al.  Reliability of clinician-based (GRBAS and CAPE-V) and patient-based (V-RQOL and IPVI) documentation of voice disorders. , 2007, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[26]  P. Carding,et al.  The prevalence of childhood dysphonia: a cross-sectional study. , 2006, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[27]  A. Reich,et al.  Methodological variables affecting phonational frequency range in adults. , 1990, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[28]  R. Zraick,et al.  The effect of task on determination of habitual loudness. , 2004, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[29]  M. Andrews,et al.  Voice treatment for children and adolescents , 2002 .

[30]  D. Kraus,et al.  Arytenoid adduction as an adjunct to type I thyroplasty for unilateral vocal cord paralysis , 1999, Head & neck.