Genetic diversity in the coat protein coding region of eighty-six sugarcane mosaic virus isolates from eight countries, particularly from Cameroon and Congo

Summary. Fifty-eight sugarcane virus isolates were obtained from leaves showing mosaic symptoms, and collected in Cameroon (26 isolates), Congo (20 isolates), Egypt (1 isolate), South Africa (3 isolates) and the U.S.A. (8 isolates). All these isolates belonged to Sugarcane mosaic virus (SCMV) based on the amplification product obtained by RT-PCR with SCMV-specific primers. The amplicons (0.9 kb) from the coat protein (CP) coding region were cloned, sequenced and compared to each other as well as to the sequences (GenBank accessions) of 16 SCMV isolates from sugarcane (Australia, South Africa and U.S.A.) and 12 SCMV isolates from maize (Australia, Germany and China). Maximum likelihood and maximum parsimony analyses robustly supported two major monophyletic groups that were correlated with the host of origin: the SCE or sugarcane group that included all isolates from sugarcane and the MZ or maize group that contained all isolates from maize. The 86 virus isolates were distributed in 13 minor phylogenetic groups, four (I–IV) restricted to maize and nine (V–XIII) to sugarcane. A strong correlation was observed between the sugarcane groups and the geographical origin of the SCMV isolates. Each SCMV type strain from sugarcane (A, B, D, E and SC) was distributed in a different phylogenetic group or subgroup. The 26 isolates from Cameroon constituted a relatively homogenous group (group V) whereas the 20 isolates from Congo belonged to two other groups (VI and VII). All the isolates from Cameroon and Congo were different from the SCMV type strains and other strains or isolates studied so far. It appears, therefore, that the population of SCMV from sugarcane in Africa contains virus genotypes that have not yet been described.

[1]  E. Douzery,et al.  High genetic diversity, distant phylogenetic relationships and intraspecies recombination events among natural populations of Yam mosaic virus: a contribution to understanding potyvirus evolution. , 2000, The Journal of general virology.

[2]  Darren Martin,et al.  RDP: detection of recombination amongst aligned sequences , 2000, Bioinform..

[3]  C. Ward,et al.  Amino Acid Sequence Homology of Coat Proteins as a Basis for Identification and Classification of the Potyvirus Group , 1988 .

[4]  T. Mirkov,et al.  Sequence and Relationships of Sugarcane Mosaic and Sorghum Mosaic Virus Strains and Development of RT-PCR-Based RFLPs for Strain Discrimination. , 1997, Phytopathology.

[5]  V. P. Agnihotri,et al.  Current trends in sugarcane pathology. , 1994 .

[6]  R. Ford,et al.  Taxonomy of potyviruses infecting maize, sorghum, and sugarcane in Australia and the United States as determined by reactivities of polyclonal antibodies directed towards virus-specific N-termini of coat proteins. , 1989 .

[7]  J. Dale,et al.  Sequence diversity in the coat protein coding region of twelve sugarcane mosaic potyvirus isolates from Australia, USA and South Africa , 1998, Archives of Virology.

[8]  N. Mckern,et al.  Sequence data as the major criterion for potyvirus classification. , 1992, Archives of virology. Supplementum.

[9]  J. Felsenstein CONFIDENCE LIMITS ON PHYLOGENIES: AN APPROACH USING THE BOOTSTRAP , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[10]  N. Mckern,et al.  Confirmation that the Sugarcane Mosaic Virus Subgroup Consists of Four Distinct Potyviruses by Using Peptide Profiles of Coat Proteins , 1991 .

[11]  W. Ens,et al.  Characterization of a novel potyvirus isolated from maize in Israel. , 2000, Phytopathology.

[12]  N. Mckern,et al.  Present status of the sugarcane mosaic subgroup of potyviruses. , 1992, Archives of virology. Supplementum.