The Effect of Handle Friction and Inward or Outward Torque on Maximum Axial Push Force

Objective: To investigate the relationship among friction, applied torque, and axial push force on cylindrical handles. Background: We have earlier demonstrated that participants can exert greater contact force and torque in an “inward” movement of the hand about the long axis of a gripped cylinder (wrist flexion/forearm supination) than they can in an “outward” hand movement. Method: Twelve healthy participants exerted anteriorly directed maximum push forces along the long axis of aluminum and rubber handles while applying deliberate inward or outward torques, no torque (straight), and an unspecified (preferred) torque. Results: Axial push force was 12% greater for the rubber handle than for the aluminum handle. Participants exerted mean torques of 1.1, 0.3, 2.5, and —2.0 Nm and axial push forces of 94, 85, 75, and 65 N for the preferred, straight, inward, and outward trials, respectively. Left to decide for themselves, participants tended to apply inward torques, which were associated with increased axial push forces. Conclusion: Axial push force was limited by hand-handle coupling — not the whole body's push strength. Participants appeared to intuitively know that the application of an inward torque would improve their maximum axial push force. Axial push forces were least when a deliberate torque was requested, probably because high levels of torque exertions interfered with the push. Application: A low-friction handle decreases maximum axial push force. It should be anticipated that people will apply inward torque during maximum axial push.

[1]  M. M. Ayoub,et al.  The determination of an optimum size cylindrical handle by use of electromyography. , 1971, Ergonomics.

[2]  J W Garrett,et al.  The Adult Human Hand: Some Anthropometric and Biomechanical Considerations , 1971, Human factors.

[3]  W Rohmert,et al.  Problems in determining rest allowances Part 1: use of modern methods to evaluate stress and strain in static muscular work. , 1973, Applied ergonomics.

[4]  J. Basmajian Biofeedback: Principles and practice for clinicians , 1979 .

[5]  H. Devries,et al.  "Efficiency of electrical activity" as a physiological measure of the functional state of muscle tissue. , 1968, American journal of physical medicine.

[6]  M. Hoffer,et al.  The Effect of Wrist Deviation on Grip and Pinch Strength , 1995, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  V. Mathiowetz,et al.  Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults. , 1985, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  Å. Kilbom,et al.  Physiological response in the forearm during and after isometric intermittent handgrip , 1991, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[9]  T. Armstrong,et al.  A conceptual model for work-related neck and upper-limb musculoskeletal disorders. , 1993, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[10]  Robert G. Radwin,et al.  Grip Force Vectors for Varying Handle Diameters and Hand Sizes , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[11]  D. Chaffin,et al.  The effect of torque direction and cylindrical handle diameter on the coupling between the hand and a cylindrical handle. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  T J Armstrong,et al.  An investigation of human palmar skin friction and the effects of materials, pinch force and moisture. , 1988, Ergonomics.

[13]  Thomas J. Armstrong,et al.  Inward Torque and High-Friction Handles Can Reduce Required Muscle Efforts for Torque Generation , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[14]  Beverley Norris,et al.  Filling 'gaps' in strength data for design. , 2003, Applied ergonomics.

[15]  Olle Bobjer,et al.  Friction and discomfort in the design and use of hand tools : exposure to textures at different loads and velocities with reference to contamination , 2004 .

[16]  S. Delp,et al.  Maximum isometric moments generated by the wrist muscles in flexion-extension and radial-ulnar deviation. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  B J Daams Static force exertion in postures with different degrees of freedom. , 1993, Ergonomics.

[18]  C Fransson-Hall,et al.  Acceptability of Intermittent Handgrip Contractions Based on Physiological Response , 1994, Human factors.

[19]  T S Miles,et al.  Control of motor units in human flexor digitorum profundus under different proprioceptive conditions , 1997, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  C G Drury Handles for manual materials handling. , 1980, Applied ergonomics.

[21]  D A Stubbs,et al.  Safe levels of manual forces for young males (1). , 1977, Applied ergonomics.

[22]  Don B. Chaffin,et al.  Volitional Postures during Maximal Push/Pull Exertions in the Sagittal Plane , 1981, Human factors.

[23]  T D Cahalan,et al.  The relationship between wrist position, grasp size, and grip strength. , 1992, The Journal of hand surgery.

[24]  John V. Basmajian Biofeedback: Principles and practice for clinicians, 3rd ed. , 1989 .

[25]  Katharyn A. Grant,et al.  An analysis of handle designs for reducing manual effort: The influence of grip diameter , 1992 .

[26]  S H Snook,et al.  The design of manual handling tasks: revised tables of maximum acceptable weights and forces. , 1991, Ergonomics.

[27]  Katharyn A. Grant,et al.  Effectiveness of a handle flange for reducing manual effort during hand tool use , 1993 .

[28]  Thomas J. Armstrong,et al.  An Analysis of Task-Based Worker Self-Assessments of Force , 2004 .