Performance of fixed in-car microphone array beamformer under variations in car noise

Microphone array beamforming is being increasingly employed in the automotive industry for the suppression of car noise associated with tire friction, wind, and the vehicle engine. In many cases, this noise can be treated as stationary, facilitating fixed, non-adaptive statistically optimal beamformer implementation. This way, the noise properties can be inferred in highly controlled laboratory conditions, leading to a reliable, predictable, and simple beamforming solution. However, although the driving noise is stationary, its acoustic properties may depend on the type of the road on which the vehicle is traveling, e.g. concrete road versus asphalt or new road versus old. Hence, the performance of a fixed beamformer may suffer in a case where it is applied to a road type that differs from the one for which it was designed. In the current work, we study this effect for the widely used family of Minimum Variance Distortionless Response (MVDR) beamformers. The results suggest that the negative impact due to the noise mismatch may be significant in certain frequency bands. Nevertheless, a speech recognition experiment carried out on enhanced voice signals demonstrates that interchanging between the road types investigated here has, overall, a relatively mild effect on the recognition performance.

[1]  Yair Kerner,et al.  Two Microphone Array MVDR Beamforming with Controlled Beamwidth and Immunity to Gain Mismatch , 2012, IWAENC.

[2]  Michael D. Zoltowski,et al.  Multiply-constrained MVDR matched field processing with a-posteriori constraints for enhanced robustness to mismatch , 1991, [1991] Conference Record of the Twenty-Fifth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers.

[3]  Seung Ho Han,et al.  Adaptive microphone array processing for high-performance speech recognition in car environment , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE).

[4]  Lloyd J. Griffiths,et al.  A projection approach for robust adaptive beamforming , 1994, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[5]  Michael Mason,et al.  Small footprint implementation of dual-microphone delay-and-sum beamforming for in-car speech enhancement , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[6]  Alexander Kovtonyuk,et al.  Investigation of effectiveness of microphone arrays for in car use based on sound field simulation , 2001, 2001 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37221).

[7]  Harry L. Van Trees,et al.  Optimum Array Processing , 2002 .

[8]  Prasanga N. Samarasinghe,et al.  Recent Advances in Active Noise Control Inside Automobile Cabins: Toward quieter cars , 2016, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[9]  Jie Hao,et al.  Robust Technologies towards Automatic Speech Recognition in Car Noise Environments , 2006, 2006 8th international Conference on Signal Processing.

[10]  N. Chapman,et al.  Improving Statistical Robustness of Matched-Field Source Localization via General-Rank Covariance Matrix Matching , 2016, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[11]  Roland Badeau,et al.  A subband hybrid beamforming for in-car speech enhancement , 2012, 2012 Proceedings of the 20th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO).

[12]  W. Marsden.  I and J , 2012 .

[13]  Sharon Gannot,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of MVDR and MPDR beamformers , 2010, 2010 IEEE 26-th Convention of Electrical and Electronics Engineers in Israel.

[14]  John H. L. Hansen,et al.  Analysis of CFA-BF: Novel combined fixed/adaptive beamforming for robust speech recognition in real car environments , 2010, Speech Commun..

[15]  Kazuya Takeda,et al.  Synthesis of car noise based on a composition of engine noise and friction noise , 2002, 2002 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[16]  Markus Christoph.  On the Plausibility of a Personalized Acoustic in Automobiles , 2012, ITG Conference on Speech Communication.