Functional Connectivity Analyses in Imaging Genetics: Considerations on Methods and Data Interpretation

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) can be combined with genotype assessment to identify brain systems that mediate genetic vulnerability to mental disorders (“imaging genetics”). A data analysis approach that is widely applied is “functional connectivity”. In this approach, the temporal correlation between the fMRI signal from a pre-defined brain region (the so-called “seed point”) and other brain voxels is determined. In this technical note, we show how the choice of freely selectable data analysis parameters strongly influences the assessment of the genetic modulation of connectivity features. In our data analysis we exemplarily focus on three methodological parameters: (i) seed voxel selection, (ii) noise reduction algorithms, and (iii) use of additional second level covariates. Our results show that even small variations in the implementation of a functional connectivity analysis can have an impact on the connectivity pattern that is as strong as the potential modulation by genetic allele variants. Some effects of genetic variation can only be found for one specific implementation of the connectivity analysis. A reoccurring difficulty in the field of psychiatric genetics is the non-replication of initially promising findings, partly caused by the small effects of single genes. The replication of imaging genetic results is therefore crucial for the long-term assessment of genetic effects on neural connectivity parameters. For a meaningful comparison of imaging genetics studies however, it is therefore necessary to provide more details on specific methodological parameters (e.g., seed voxel distribution) and to give information how robust effects are across the choice of methodological parameters.

[1]  Joseph H. Callicott,et al.  Functional Polymorphisms in PRODH Are Associated with Risk and Protection for Schizophrenia and Fronto-Striatal Structure and Function , 2008, PLoS genetics.

[2]  Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg,et al.  From maps to mechanisms through neuroimaging of schizophrenia , 2010, Nature.

[3]  Kaiming Li,et al.  Review of methods for functional brain connectivity detection using fMRI , 2009, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[4]  Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg,et al.  Neural connectivity as an intermediate phenotype: Brain networks under genetic control , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[5]  K Mathiak,et al.  Effects of a CACNA1C genotype on attention networks in healthy individuals , 2010, Psychological Medicine.

[6]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Advances and Pitfalls in the Analysis and Interpretation of Resting-State FMRI Data , 2010, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[8]  S. Cichon,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of a Genome-Wide Supported Psychosis Variant , 2009, Science.

[9]  Peter Fransson,et al.  Assessing the Influence of Different ROI Selection Strategies on Functional Connectivity Analyses of fMRI Data Acquired During Steady-State Conditions , 2011, PloS one.

[10]  Archana Venkataraman,et al.  Intrinsic functional connectivity as a tool for human connectomics: theory, properties, and optimization. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  Manuel A. R. Ferreira,et al.  Collaborative genome-wide association analysis supports a role for ANK3 and CACNA1C in bipolar disorder , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[12]  Rupert Lanzenberger,et al.  Correlations and anticorrelations in resting-state functional connectivity MRI: A quantitative comparison of preprocessing strategies , 2009, NeuroImage.

[13]  A. Meyer-Lindenberg,et al.  Intermediate phenotypes and genetic mechanisms of psychiatric disorders , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[14]  Tilo Kircher,et al.  Partial support for ZNF804A genotype‐dependent alterations in prefrontal connectivity , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[15]  Marcus R. Munafò,et al.  Serotonin Transporter (5-HTTLPR) Genotype and Amygdala Activation: A Meta-Analysis , 2008, Biological Psychiatry.

[16]  Susanne Erk,et al.  Cognitive state and connectivity effects of the genome-wide significant psychosis variant in ZNF804A , 2011, NeuroImage.

[17]  Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg,et al.  Allelic Variation in RGS4 Impacts Functional and Structural Connectivity in the Human Brain , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  Kevin Murphy,et al.  The impact of global signal regression on resting state correlations: Are anti-correlated networks introduced? , 2009, NeuroImage.

[19]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Functional Connectivity: The Principal-Component Analysis of Large (PET) Data Sets , 1993, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[20]  A. Meyer-Lindenberg,et al.  Neural substrates of pleiotropic action of genetic variation in COMT: a meta-analysis , 2010, Molecular Psychiatry.

[21]  S Cichon,et al.  Effects of a genome-wide supported psychosis risk variant on neural activation during a theory-of-mind task , 2011, Molecular Psychiatry.

[22]  A. Meyer-Lindenberg,et al.  5-HTTLPR polymorphism impacts human cingulate-amygdala interactions: a genetic susceptibility mechanism for depression , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  Michael B. Miller,et al.  How reliable are the results from functional magnetic resonance imaging? , 2010, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[24]  J. Xiong,et al.  Detecting functional connectivity in the resting brain: a comparison between ICA and CCA. , 2007, Magnetic resonance imaging.