A narrative review of dexterity assessments.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J. Tiffin,et al. The Purdue pegboard; norms and studies of reliability and validity. , 1948, The Journal of applied psychology.
[2] E. Moberg,et al. Objective methods for determining the functional value of sensibility in the hand. , 1958, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.
[4] R. H. Jebsen,et al. An objective and standardized test of hand function. , 1969, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
[5] N. Silberberg,et al. Hand strength and dexterity. , 1971, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.
[6] Norman H. Hamm,et al. Normative Data for the Purdue Pegboard on a Sample of Adult Candidates for Vocational Rehabilitation , 1980 .
[7] Use of a Test of Psychomotor Ability in an Expanded Role , 1981, Perceptual and motor skills.
[8] M G Wardle,et al. Use of the Minnesota Rate of Manipulation Test for Disability Evaluation , 1982, Perceptual and motor skills.
[9] Mark E. Williams,et al. Manual ability as a marker of dependency in geriatric women. , 1982, Journal of chronic diseases.
[10] Ralph L. Rosnow,et al. Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis , 1984 .
[11] N Clopton,et al. Examinee position and performance on the Minnesota Rate of Manipulation Test. , 1984, Journal of rehabilitation.
[12] Does the Crawford Small Parts Dexterity Test Require New Norms? , 1985 .
[13] V. Mathiowetz,et al. Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. , 1985, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.
[14] V. Mathiowetz,et al. Adult Norms for the Nine Hole Peg Test of Finger Dexterity , 1985 .
[15] D. Goodkin,et al. Upper extremity function in multiple sclerosis: improving assessment sensitivity with box-and-block and nine-hole peg tests. , 1988, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
[16] K. Lynch,et al. Validity of the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test in Predicting Activities of Daily Living , 1989 .
[17] C. A. Trombly,et al. Occupational Therapy for Physical Dysfunction , 1989 .
[18] Catherine L. Backman,et al. Assessment of Hand Function: The Relationship between Pegboard Dexterity and Applied Dexterity , 1992 .
[19] R M Ruff,et al. Gender- and Age-Specific Changes in Motor Speed and Eye-Hand Coordination in Adults: Normative Values for the Finger Tapping and Grooved Pegboard Tests , 1993, Perceptual and motor skills.
[20] R. Hébert,et al. Validation of the Box and Block Test as a measure of dexterity of elderly people: reliability, validity, and norms studies. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
[21] Dominic A. Brandy,et al. The O'Connor Tweezer Dexterity Test as a Screening Tool for Hiring Surgical Hair Restoration Assistants , 1995 .
[22] W. Lankveld,et al. Sequential Occupational Dexterity Assessment (SODA) , 1996 .
[23] J. Desrosiers,et al. The Minnesota Manual Dexterity Test: Reliability, Validity and Reference Values Studies with Healthy Elderly People , 1997 .
[24] J. Greenhalgh,et al. Reviewing and selecting outcome measures for use in routine practice. , 1998, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.
[25] D Rudman,et al. An instrument evaluation framework: description and application to assessments of hand function. , 1998, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.
[26] W. van Lankveld,et al. The Short Version of the Sequential Occupational Dexterity Assessment based on individual tasks' sensitivity to change. , 1999, Arthritis care and research : the official journal of the Arthritis Health Professions Association.
[27] S. P. Chow,et al. The Moberg pickup test: results of testing with a standard protocol. , 1999, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.
[28] J. Krishnan,et al. Correlation between objective and subjective measures of hand function in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. , 1999, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.
[29] L A Buddenberg,et al. Test-retest reliability of the Purdue Pegboard Test. , 2000, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.
[30] E. Taub,et al. The reliability of the wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
[31] S. Wolf,et al. Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as Outcome Measure for Research in Patients After Stroke , 2001, Stroke.
[32] D. Aaron,et al. Development of the Functional Dexterity Test (FDT): construction, validity, reliability, and normative data. , 2003, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.
[33] Virgil Mathiowetz,et al. Test-retest reliability of the Purdue Pegboard for persons with multiple sclerosis. , 2003, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.
[34] Lynn R Surrey,et al. A comparison of performance outcomes between the Minnesota Rate of Manipulation Test and the Minnesota Manual Dexterity Test. , 2003, Work.
[35] Christina Jerosch-Herold,et al. A Study of the Relative Responsiveness of Five Sensibility Tests for Assessment of Recovery after Median Nerve Injury and Repair , 2003, Journal of hand surgery.
[36] Kimatha Oxford Grice,et al. Adult norms for a commercially available Nine Hole Peg Test for finger dexterity. , 2003, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.
[37] T. Platz,et al. Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: a multicentre study , 2005, Clinical rehabilitation.
[38] P. J. Bryden,et al. A new method of administering the Grooved Pegboard Test: Performance as a function of handedness and sex , 2005, Brain and Cognition.
[39] E. Taub,et al. The EXCITE Trial: Attributes of the Wolf Motor Function Test in Patients with Subacute Stroke , 2005, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.
[40] C. Häger-Ross,et al. Hand function in Charcot Marie Tooth: test retest reliability of some measurements , 2006, Clinical rehabilitation.
[41] J. Whitall,et al. Psychometric properties of a modified Wolf Motor Function test for people with mild and moderate upper-extremity hemiparesis. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
[42] D. Man,et al. The discriminative power of the Wolf motor function test in assessing upper extremity functions in persons with stroke. , 2006, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.
[43] Kurt P Spindler,et al. How to Write a Systematic Review , 2007, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.
[44] N. Ashworth,et al. Normative values and the effects of age, gender, and handedness on the Moberg Pick‐Up Test , 2007, Muscle & nerve.
[45] D. Maiden,et al. An examination of the validity of the orrisby Manual Dexterity Test , 2010 .