Participation and publics: supporting community engagement

CHI researchers are beginning a shift from studying technology use in uncommon or exotic communities to designing and deploying technology interventions into those same settings. This paper picks up on these recent developments and further examines the impact and implication of using a bespoke technology platform within the context of providing shelter and basic social services to homeless mothers and their children. I build on findings from a previous system deployment by describing targeted changes made to the technology, the design impetus for making those changes, and the resulting impact those changes had on the relationship between shelter staff, residents, and the information they shared via the system. By way of the findings reported here, I continue to develop the framing of Deweyan publics as a way to scaffold an environmental approach to technology design in contexts with multiple and diverse stakeholders.

[1]  Gary Marsden,et al.  Designing technology for the developing world , 2006, INTR.

[2]  Ellen Balka,et al.  Inside the belly of the beast: the challenges and successes of a reformist participatory agenda , 2006, PDC '06.

[3]  Jill Palzkill Woelfer,et al.  Homeless young people's experiences with information systems: life and work in a community technology center , 2010, CHI.

[4]  R. Asen,et al.  The Multiple Mr. Dewey: Multiple Publics and Permeable Borders in John Dewey's Theory of the Public Sphere , 2003 .

[5]  Bonnie Nardi,et al.  Survival needs and social inclusion: technology use among the homeless , 2010, CSCW '10.

[6]  Emily Troshynski,et al.  Accountabilities of presence: reframing location-based systems , 2008, CHI.

[7]  M. Rutten,et al.  Seeing like a State. , 2010 .

[8]  J. Dewey,et al.  The Public and its Problems , 1927 .

[9]  W. Keith Edwards,et al.  Publics in practice: ubiquitous computing at a shelter for homeless mothers , 2011, CHI.

[10]  W. Lippmann.  The Phantom Public , 1925 .

[11]  Julie Hersberger.  Are the economically poor information poor? Does the digital divide affect the homeless and access to information? , 2013 .

[12]  J. P. Bartholomew.  Fred Turner. From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the Rise of Digital Utopianism , 2007 .

[13]  Per-Anders Hillgren,et al.  Participatory design and "democratizing innovation" , 2010, PDC '10.

[14]  SengersPhoebe.  What I learned on Change Islands , 2011 .

[15]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  What I learned on Change Islands: reflections on IT and pace of life , 2011, INTR.

[16]  W. Keith Edwards,et al.  The view from the trenches: organization, power, and technology at two nonprofit homeless outreach centers , 2008, CSCW.

[17]  Walter Buhr,et al.  What is infrastructure , 2003 .

[18]  C. DiSalvo,et al.  Design and the Construction of Publics , 2009, Design Issues.

[19]  W. Keith Edwards,et al.  Designs on dignity: perceptions of technology among the homeless , 2008, CHI.

[20]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Storied spaces: Cultural accounts of mobility, technology, and environmental knowing , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[21]  J. Habermas,et al.  The structural transformation of the public sphere : an inquiryinto a category of bourgeois society , 1991 .

[22]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[23]  Julie Hersberger.  The homeless and information needs and services , 2005 .

[24]  Elizabeth D. Mynatt,et al.  Interorganizational coordination and awareness in a nonprofit ecosystem , 2010, CSCW '10.

[25]  Morten Kyng,et al.  Cardboard Computers: Mocking-it-up or Hands-on the Future , 1992 .

[26]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Everyday practice and sustainable HCI: understanding and learning from cultures of (un)sustainability , 2011, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[27]  Kris Cohen.  Who We Talk About When We Talk About Users , 2005 .

[28]  Dan Shapiro,et al.  Participatory design: the will to succeed , 2005, Critical Computing.

[29]  The Issues Deser,et al.  Pragmatist Contributions to the Study of Public Involvement in Controversy , 2008 .

[30]  D. Gaonkar.  Publics and counterpublics , 2002 .

[31]  Pelle Ehn,et al.  Participation in design things , 2008, PDC.

[32]  Steve Benford,et al.  Ambiguity as a resource for design , 2003, CHI '03.

[33]  Frederick Turner,et al.  From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the Rise of Digital Utopianism , 2006 .

[34]  Morten Kyng,et al.  Design at Work , 1992 .

[35]  Carl F. DiSalvo,et al.  Mapmover: a case study of design-oriented research into collective expression and constructed publics , 2007, CHI.

[36]  Amy Bruckman,et al.  Domestic violence and information communication technologies , 2011, Interact. Comput..

[37]  Irina Shklovski,et al.  The commodification of location: dynamics of power in location-based systems , 2009, UbiComp.

[38]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Participatory design in community computing contexts: tales from the field , 2004, PDC 04.

[39]  W. Keith Edwards,et al.  A tale of two publics: democratizing design at the margins , 2010, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[40]  Tapan S. Parikh,et al.  Avaaj Otalo: a field study of an interactive voice forum for small farmers in rural India , 2010, CHI.

[41]  W. Keith Edwards,et al.  Across boundaries of influence and accountability: the multiple scales of public sector information systems , 2010, CHI.

[42]  Jill Palzkill Woelfer,et al.  Improving the safety of homeless young people with mobile phones: values, form and function , 2011, CHI.

[43]  Kentaro Toyama,et al.  Where there's a will there's a way: mobile media sharing in urban india , 2010, CHI.

[44]  Eevi E. Beck,et al.  P for Political: Participation is Not Enough , 2002 .