A dynamic perspective of government intervention in a competitive closed-loop supply chain

Abstract Changes in environmental burden are inherently dynamic because a steady state cannot be instantaneously reached, and the current state is associated with the previous state and continuously evolves. In this study, we examine a dynamic closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) consisting of an original equipment manufacturer (OEM) selling new products and an independent remanufacturer (IR) selling recovered products generated from end-of-life (EOL) products. The government intervenes in the CLSC by imposing taxes or subsidies to reduce the environmental burden. We propose a baseline model without government intervention and six different policies: a fixed tax or subsidy on the firm side, a unit tax or subsidy on the firm side, and a unit tax or subsidy on the consumer side. We derive the firms’ closed-form instantaneous and steady-state decisions at the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium. Finally, we conduct a comparative study to explore the effects of the policies on the environmental burden, firm profits (producer surpluses), consumer surplus, and social welfare. We find that the proposed policies can effectively reduce the environmental burden and mitigate the intensity of price competition, except for the policy with the fixed subsidy to the IR. The policies are all profitable for the IR and, thus, effective in encouraging recovery; however, the policies are not necessarily profitable for the OEM. The policies with a unit tax for consumers and fixed subsidy for the OEM are more conducive to social welfare. Moreover, the degree of dynamics improves the effectiveness of the policies in reducing the environmental burden.

[1]  Gérard P. Cachon,et al.  Game Theory in Supply Chain Analysis , 2004 .

[2]  Cheng-Han Wu,et al.  Cooperation regarding technology development in a closed-loop supply chain , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  Georges Zaccour,et al.  A selective survey of game-theoretic models of closed-loop supply chains , 2019, 4OR.

[4]  Luk N. Van Wassenhove,et al.  Remanufacturing as a Marketing Strategy , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[5]  Kannan Govindan,et al.  Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain: A comprehensive review to explore the future , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Chongwoo Choe,et al.  On the Flexibility of Optimal Policies for Green Design , 2001 .

[7]  Gary M. Erickson,et al.  A differential game model of the marketing-operations interface , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Luca Lambertini,et al.  Dynamic Oligopoly with Sticky Prices: Closed-Loop, Feedback, and Open-Loop Solutions , 2004 .

[9]  Sarada Prasad Sarmah,et al.  Impact of government incentive on price competition of closed-loop supply chain systems , 2018, INFOR Inf. Syst. Oper. Res..

[10]  E. Haites Carbon taxes and greenhouse gas emissions trading systems: what have we learned? , 2018, Climate Policy.

[11]  Tsan-Ming Choi,et al.  Reverse supply chain systems optimization with dual channel and demand disruptions: Sustainability, CSR investment and pricing coordination , 2019, Inf. Sci..

[12]  Georges Zaccour,et al.  Incentive strategies for an optimal recovery program in a closed-loop supply chain , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Jagmohan S. Raju,et al.  Positioning and Pricing in a Variety Seeking Market , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[14]  Zuo-Jun Max Shen,et al.  Improving Consumer Welfare and Manufacturer Profit via Government Subsidy Programs: Subsidizing Consumers or Manufacturers? , 2017, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[15]  Fouad El Ouardighi,et al.  Pollution accumulation and abatement policy in a supply chain , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  Fangruo Chen,et al.  On the Competition between Two Modes of Product Recovery: Remanufacturing and Refurbishing , 2019, Production and Operations Management.

[17]  Georges Zaccour,et al.  On the coordination of dynamic marketing channels and two-part tariffs , 2006, Autom..

[18]  Jorge Navas,et al.  An analysis of efficiency of time-consistent coordination mechanisms in a model of supply chain management , 2019, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  C. Fershtman,et al.  Dynamic Duopolistic Competition with Sticky Prices , 1987 .

[20]  R. Teunter Economic ordering quantities for recoverable item inventory systems , 2001 .

[21]  G. Zaccour,et al.  DYNAMIC COOPERATIVE ADVERTISING IN A CHANNEL , 2000 .

[22]  Fouad El Ouardighi,et al.  Quality improvement and goodwill accumulation in a dynamic duopoly , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[23]  Claudio A. Piga,et al.  Competition in a duopoly with sticky price and advertising , 2000 .

[24]  Vincenzo Denicolò,et al.  A dynamic model of patent portfolio races , 2012 .

[25]  S. Webster,et al.  Competition in remanufacturing and the effects of government subsidies , 2008 .

[26]  Charles J. Corbett,et al.  Shared-Savings Contracts for Indirect Materials in Supply Chains: Channel Profits and Environmental Impacts , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[27]  Ehsan Shekarian,et al.  A review of factors affecting closed-loop supply chain models , 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[28]  Kannan Govindan,et al.  A review of reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chains: a Journal of Cleaner Production focus , 2017 .

[29]  Jacques-François Thisse,et al.  On the Nature of Competition With Differentiated Products , 1986 .

[30]  Tamer Boyacı,et al.  Did Europe Move in the Right Direction on E‐waste Legislation? , 2018, Production and Operations Management.

[31]  Johan Springael,et al.  Simulation with system dynamics and fuzzy reasoning of a tax policy to reduce CO2 emissions in the residential sector , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[32]  A. Atasu,et al.  Operational Implications of Environmental Regulation , 2017 .

[33]  K. Govindan,et al.  Reverse and closed loop supply chain coordination by considering government role , 2017 .

[34]  Anthony J. Dukes,et al.  Strategic Manufacturer Response to a Dominant Retailer , 2007 .

[35]  Zhang Zhao,et al.  Production , Manufacturing and Logistics Dual-channel closed-loop supply chain with government consumption-subsidy , 2012 .

[36]  H. Hotelling Stability in Competition , 1929 .

[37]  I-Hsuan Hong,et al.  The effects of government subsidies on decentralised reverse supply chains , 2016 .

[38]  Scott Webster,et al.  Competitive strategy in remanufacturing and the impact of take-back laws , 2007 .

[39]  Cheng-Han Wu,et al.  Licensing to a competitor and strategic royalty choice in a dynamic duopoly , 2019, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[40]  Izabela Ewa Nielsen,et al.  Is It a Strategic Move to Subsidized Consumers Instead of the Manufacturer? , 2019, IEEE Access.

[41]  Lianghua Chen,et al.  Research on low-carbon strategies in supply chain with environmental regulations based on differential game , 2018 .

[42]  G. Zaccour,et al.  Cost–Revenue Sharing in a Closed-Loop Supply Chain , 2013 .

[43]  Cheng-Han Wu Strategic and operational decisions under sales competition and collection competition for end-of-use products in remanufacturing , 2015, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[44]  Mark E. Ferguson,et al.  The Effect of Competition on Recovery Strategies , 2006 .

[45]  Fuqiang Zhang,et al.  Trade-In Remanufacturing, Customer Purchasing Behavior, and Government Policy , 2017, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[46]  Sarada Prasad Sarmah,et al.  Managing channel profit and total surplus in a closed-loop supply chain network , 2017, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[47]  Luk N. Van Wassenhove,et al.  Efficient Take‐Back Legislation , 2009 .

[48]  R. Musgrave,et al.  Ad Valorem and Unit Taxes Compared , 1953 .

[49]  Hao Sun,et al.  Reward-penalty mechanism for a two-period closed-loop supply chain , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[50]  Xun Xu,et al.  A differential game model for closed-loop supply chain participants under carbon emission permits , 2019, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[51]  Luca Lambertini,et al.  A differential oligopoly game with differentiated goods and sticky prices , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[52]  V. Daniel R. Guide,et al.  OR FORUM - The Evolution of Closed-Loop Supply Chain Research , 2009, Oper. Res..