Robust identification of partial-correlation based networks with applications to cortical thickness data

Insight into brain development and organization can be gained by computing correlations between structural and functional measures in parcellated cortex. Partial correlations can often reduce ambiguity in correlation data by identifying those pairs of regions whose similarity cannot be explained by the influence of other regions with which they may both interact. Consequently a graph with edges indicating non-zero partial correlations may reveal important subnetworks obscured in the correlation data. Here we describe and investigate PC*, a graph pruning algorithm for identification of the partial correlation network in comparison to direct calculation of partial correlations from the inverse of the sample correlation matrix. We show that PC* is far more robust and illustrate its use in the study of covariation in cortical thickness in ROIs defined on a parcellated cortex.

[1]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[2]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  The Human Connectome: A Structural Description of the Human Brain , 2005, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[3]  C. Quensel.  The distribution of the partial correlation coefficient in samples from multivariate universesin a special case of non-normally distributed random variables , 1953 .

[4]  Tom Burr,et al.  Causation, Prediction, and Search , 2003, Technometrics.

[5]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[6]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Small-world anatomical networks in the human brain revealed by cortical thickness from MRI. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[7]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Mapping anatomical correlations across cerebral cortex (MACACC) using cortical thickness from MRI , 2006, NeuroImage.

[8]  R. Fisher.  035: The Distribution of the Partial Correlation Coefficient. , 1924 .

[9]  Arthur W. Toga,et al.  A Framework for Brain Registration via Simultaneous Surface and Volume Flow , 2009, IPMI.

[10]  Christopher Meek,et al.  Strong completeness and faithfulness in Bayesian networks , 1995, UAI.

[11]  Arthur W. Toga,et al.  Bayesian approach for network modeling of brain structural features , 2010, Medical Imaging.

[12]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  BrainSuite: An Automated Cortical Surface Identification Tool , 2000, MICCAI.

[13]  Z. Jane Wang,et al.  Controlling the False Discovery Rate of the Association/Causality Structure Learned with the PC Algorithm , 2009, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[14]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Network structure of cerebral cortex shapes functional connectivity on multiple time scales , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  J. N. R. Jeffers,et al.  Graphical Models in Applied Multivariate Statistics. , 1990 .