INTRAGUILD PREDATION DIMINISHED IN COMPLEX-STRUCTURED VEGETATION: IMPLICATIONS FOR PREY SUPPRESSION

Multiple-predator limitation of prey populations may be mediated by both predator–predator interactions and vegetation structure. Antagonistic interactions among predators, such as intraguild predation, can diminish the collective impact of natural enemies on prey population size. However, structurally complex vegetation may moderate such interactions by providing a refuge for predators, thereby enhancing prey suppression. Specifically, we examined the combined impact of two salt-marsh-inhabiting invertebrate predators, the mirid Tytthus vagus and the wolf spider Pardosa littoralis, on suppression of their shared prey, the planthopper Prokelisia dolus, in simple (thatch-free) and complex (thatch-rich) vegetation. In structurally simple habitats in the laboratory, the predators interacted antagonistically, due to the intraguild predation of mirids by spiders, and predation pressure on the planthopper population was relaxed. However, structurally complex habitats dampened this antagonistic interaction by providing a refuge for mirids from spider predation, thereby increasing the combined effectiveness of these predators in suppressing planthopper populations. Consistent with our laboratory results, we found enhanced co-occurrence of these predators in complex habitats in the field, where mirids are apparently at lower risk from spider predation and outbreaks of planthoppers are less likely. In contrast, in simple habitats, mirids were relatively less abundant, a finding consistent with the expectation of increased intraguild predation from spiders. Therefore, in this salt marsh system, complex vegetation diminished the occurrence of intraguild predation between mirids and spiders and increased overall enemy impact on their shared herbivore prey, demonstrating for the first time that plants can mediate enemy effects on insect herbivores by influencing predator–predator interactions.

[1]  S. Riechert,et al.  Prey Control by an Assemblage of Generalist Predators: Spiders in Garden Test Systems , 1990 .

[2]  R. Denno,et al.  Predator—Planthopper Interactions , 1994 .

[3]  Teresa L. Clark,et al.  Foraging Behavior of Lacewing Larvae (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) on Plants with Divergent Architectures , 1998, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[4]  S. Wilson,et al.  Practical diagnosis and natural history of two sibling salt marsh-inhabiting planthoppers in the genus Prokelisia (Homoptera: Delphacidae) , 1987 .

[5]  W. Fagan,et al.  Interactions between Biological Control Efforts and Insecticide Applications in Tropical Rice Agroecosystems: The Potential Role of Intraguild Predation , 1998 .

[6]  D. Wise,et al.  Terrestrial Trophic Cascades: How Much Do They Trickle? , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[7]  M. Hunter,et al.  Playing Chutes and Ladders: Heterogeneity and the Relative Roles of Bottom‐Up and Top‐Down Forces in Natural Communities , 1992, Ecology.

[8]  D. Soluk Multiple Predator Effects: Predicting Combined Functional Response of Stream Fish and Invertebrate Predators , 1993 .

[9]  D. Landis,et al.  Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture. , 2000, Annual review of entomology.

[10]  Rebecca E. Forkner,et al.  WHAT GOES UP MUST COME DOWN? NUTRIENT ADDITION AND PREDATION PRESSURE ON OAK HERBIVORES , 2000 .

[11]  S. Marshall,et al.  SPIDER COMPETITION IN STRUCTURALLY SIMPLE ECOSYSTEMS , 1999 .

[12]  Alan Hastings,et al.  Trophic cascades and trophic trickles in pelagic food webs , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  G. Uetz Habitat structure and spider foraging , 1991 .

[14]  S. Marshall,et al.  ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES OF AGRICULTURAL HABITATS AND THEIR IMPACT ON THE SPIDER INHABITANTS , 1999 .

[15]  G. Huxel,et al.  Microcosms as models for generating and testing community theory , 1996 .

[16]  L. Douglass,et al.  Effects of crowding and host plant nutrition on a wing-dimorphic planthopper , 1986 .

[17]  G. Polis,et al.  MULTIFACTOR POPULATION LIMITATION: VARIABLE SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL CONTROL OF SPIDERS ON GULF OF CALIFORNIA ISLANDS , 1998 .

[18]  R. Denno,et al.  FACTORS FACILITATING SYNERGISTIC PREDATION: THE CENTRAL ROLE OF SYNCHRONY , 1999 .

[19]  G. C. Chang Comparison of Single Versus Multiple Species of Generalist Predators for Biological Control , 1996 .

[20]  J. Rosenheim Higher-order predators and the regulation of insect herbivore populations. , 1998, Annual review of entomology.

[21]  R. Denno,et al.  POSITIVE PREDATOR–PREDATOR INTERACTIONS: ENHANCED PREDATION RATES AND SYNERGISTIC SUPPRESSION OF APHID POPULATIONS , 1998 .

[22]  M. Hodge THE IMPLICATIONS OF INTRAGUILD PREDATION FOR THE ROLE OF SPIDERS IN BIOLOGICAL CONTROL , 1999 .

[23]  A. G. Cook,et al.  Planthopper/Plant Interactions: Feeding Behavior, Plant Nutrition, Plant Defense, and Host Plant Specialization , 1994 .

[24]  J. Rosenheim,et al.  Influence of intraguild predation among generalist insect predators on the suppression of an herbivore population , 1993, Oecologia.

[25]  M. Power,et al.  TOP-DOWN AND BOTTOM-UP FORCES IN FOOD WEBS: DO PLANTS HAVE PRIMACY? , 1992 .

[26]  B. Menge,et al.  Top-down and bottom-up community regulation in marine rocky intertidal habitats. , 2000, Journal of experimental marine biology and ecology.

[27]  R. Denno,et al.  DENSITY-RELATED DISPERSAL IN PLANTHOPPERS: EFFECTS OF INTERSPECIFIC CROWDING' , 1992 .

[28]  A Sih,et al.  Emergent impacts of multiple predators on prey. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[29]  G. Polis,et al.  THE ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION OF INTRAGUILD PREDATION: Potential Competitors That Eat Each Other , 1989 .

[30]  W. Fagan,et al.  Direct and Indirect Effects of Generalist Predators on a Terrestrial Arthropod Community , 1991 .

[31]  F. Gould,et al.  Manipulating natural enemies by plant variety selection and modification: a realistic strategy? , 1998, Annual review of entomology.

[32]  G. Varley,et al.  Estimating the relative roles of top-down and bottom-up forces on insect herbivore populations: a classic study revisited. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  J. Blum Salt Marsh Spartinas and Associated Algae , 1968 .

[34]  M. Dicke,et al.  Trichomes and spider-mite webbing protect predatory mite eggs from intraguild predation , 2000, Oecologia.

[35]  Jay A. Rosenheim,et al.  Intraguild predation among biological-control agents: theory and evidence , 1995 .

[36]  R D Holt,et al.  Intraguild predation: The dynamics of complex trophic interactions. , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[37]  A. Ives,et al.  GENERALIST PREDATORS DISRUPT BIOLOGICAL CONTROL BY A SPECIALIST PARASITOID , 2001 .

[38]  R. Denno,et al.  Caught Between the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea, Mobile Planthoppers Elude Natural Enemies and Deteriorating Host Plants , 2000 .

[39]  E. Heinrichs,et al.  Populations of the Brown Planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stål) (Homoptera: Delphacidae), and Its Predators on Rice Varieties with Different Levels of Resistance , 1984 .

[40]  Benrong Chen,et al.  Impact of intraguild predators on survival of a forest-floor wolf spider , 1999, Oecologia.

[41]  J. L. Gallagher,et al.  Persistent Differences in Two Forms of Spartina Alterniflora: A Common Garden Experiment , 1988 .

[42]  Andrea F. Huberty,et al.  Habitat persistence underlies intraspecific variation in the dispersal strategies of planthoppers , 1996 .

[43]  Thomas P. Rooney,et al.  Top-down cascade from a bitrophic predator in an old-field community , 1996 .

[44]  V. A. Dyck,et al.  Population regulation of the rice brown planthopper (Nilaparvata lugens Stål) within rice fields in the Philippines. , 1984 .

[45]  F. Samu,et al.  Wolf spider feeding strategies: optimality of prey consumption in Pardosa hortensis , 1993, Oecologia.

[46]  G. Polis,et al.  Complex Trophic Interactions in Deserts: An Empirical Critique of Food-Web Theory , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[47]  M. Uriarte,et al.  Experimental evidence for a behavior-mediated trophic cascade in a terrestrial food chain. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  J. Coddington,et al.  Spider (Araneae) Community Structure in an Intertidal Salt Marsh: Effects of Vegetation Structure and Tidal Flooding , 1990 .

[49]  Alfred C. Redfield,et al.  Development of a New England Salt Marsh , 1972 .