Industry variety and performance

This study advances a nascent perspective in the strategic management literature: a focus on the beneficial effects of competition among firms in an industry. Such a perspective supplements the traditional view of competition as firm rivalry. The overall purpose of the study is to provide a theoretical foundation for the study of the mutual gains associated with industry competition. Because of its importance to several different organizational theories, the concept of variety is examined as a potential source of interfirm benefits. The influence of variety is observed in 12 industries, four each from the growth, mature, and decline stages of the life cycle. In each life-cycle stage, two of the industries have substantial amounts of foreign competition while the other two do not. The study's results support two broad conclusions. First, industry variety and performance are positively related, suggesting that interfirm benefits are most feasible in industries characterized by diversity among firms' competitive strategies. Second, as industries move through the life cycle, variety decreases, implying that both strategists and policymakers need to consider the impact on aggregate variety when evaluating prescriptions for the revitalization of declining industries. Implications of these findings are derived for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers.

[1]  M. Sherif,et al.  Groups in harmony and tension : an integration of studies on intergroup relations , 1954 .

[2]  J. Schumpeter.  经济分析史 = History of economic analysis , 1954 .

[3]  W. Ashby,et al.  An Introduction to Cybernetics , 1957 .

[4]  M. Greenhut.  A theory of the firm in economic space , 1970 .

[5]  W. J. Conover,et al.  Practical Nonparametric Statistics , 1972 .

[6]  F. Scherer,et al.  Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. , 1971 .

[7]  Michael Hunt.  Competition in the major home appliance industry, 1960-1970 , 1972 .

[8]  S. Thompson,et al.  Producer Returns from Increased Milk Advertising , 1975 .

[9]  N. KhandwallaP.  Properties of Competing Organizations , 1976 .

[10]  M. Hannan,et al.  The Population Ecology of Organizations , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[11]  John W. Tukey,et al.  Exploratory Data Analysis. , 1979 .

[12]  R. Schmalensee.  Entry Deterrence in the Ready-to-Eat Breakfast Cereal Industry , 1978 .

[13]  David R. Rink,et al.  Product life cycle research: A literature review , 1979 .

[14]  Randall L. Schultz,et al.  A Study of Marketing Generalizations , 1980 .

[15]  M. Porter.  The Contributions of Industrial Organization To Strategic Management , 1981 .

[16]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. , 1981 .

[17]  Anne Sigismund Huff,et al.  Industry influences on strategy reformulation , 1982 .

[18]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[19]  R. Rothwell.  Innovation and Firm Size: A Case for Dynamic Complementarity; or, is Small Really so Beautiful? , 1983 .

[20]  H. Simon,et al.  Reason in Human Affairs. , 1984 .

[21]  Girish N. Punj,et al.  Cluster Analysis in Marketing Research: Review and Suggestions for Application , 1983 .

[22]  Glenn R. Carroll,et al.  The Specialist Strategy , 1984 .

[23]  John Freeman,et al.  The Ecological Analysis of Business Strategy , 1984 .

[24]  K. R. Harrigan.  An Application of Clustering for Strategic Group Analysis , 1985 .

[25]  A. Jaffe.  Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms&Apos; Patents, Profits and Market Value , 1986 .

[26]  B. Chakravarthy.  Measuring strategic performance , 1986 .

[27]  Julian Nikolchev,et al.  Can industries de-mature?— Applying new technologies to mature industries , 1986 .

[28]  R. E. Miles,et al.  Organizations: New Concepts for New Forms , 1986 .

[29]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance , 1986 .

[30]  Mary Louise Hatten,et al.  Strategic groups, asymmetrical mobility barriers and contestability , 1987 .

[31]  J. Tirole.  The Theory of Industrial Organization , 1988 .

[32]  F. Olleros,et al.  Strategic alliances: managing complementarity to capitalize on emerging technologies , 1988 .

[33]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Organizing Business Interests: Patterns of Trade Association Foundings, Transformations, and Deaths , 1988 .

[34]  R. Zammuto.  ORGANIZATIONAL ADAPTATION: SOME IMPLICATIONS OF ORGANIZATIONAL ECOLOGY FOR STRATEGIC CHOICE[1] , 1988 .

[35]  Barbara W. Keats.  The Vertical Construct Validity of Business Economic Performance Measures , 1988 .

[36]  Chaim Fershtman,et al.  Thinking one step ahead: The use of conjectures in competitor analysis , 1988 .

[37]  Donald D. Bergh,et al.  Performance Variations Among Strategic Group Members: An Examination of Individual Firm Capability , 1989 .

[38]  Jitendra V. Singh,et al.  Organizational Form, Population Dynamics, and Institutional Changes: The Founding Patterns of Voluntary Organizations , 1990 .

[39]  H. Thomas,et al.  THE LINKAGE BETWEEN STRATEGY, STRATEGIC GROUPS, AND PERFORMANCE IN THE U.K. RETAIL GROCERY INDUSTRY , 1990 .

[40]  Marc J. Dollinger,et al.  The Evolution of Collective Strategies in Fragmented Industries , 1990 .

[41]  M. Porter.  The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .

[42]  M. Porter.  Towards a dynamic theory of strategy , 1991 .

[43]  J. Johansson,et al.  Rivalry as Synergy? The Japanese Automobile Companies' Export Expansion , 1991 .

[44]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  The Competitive Advantage of Nations. , 1990 .