Analysis of Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) noise standard violations over 50 years: 1972 to 2019.

INTRODUCTION Noise exposure has long been an occupational health concern and has been an important area of focus of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) since its founding. Nevertheless, it remains unclear what effects OSHA's noise standards have had on employer efforts to reduce risks. Consequently, a review of OSHA noise standard violations was performed to clarify the violation trends between 1972 and 2019. METHODS Using the OSHA Information System, researchers identified 119 305 violations involving four noise standards between 1972 and 2019: 29 CFR 1910.95, occupational noise exposure in general industry; 1926.52, occupational noise exposure in construction; 1926.101, hearing protection in construction, and 1904.10, recording criteria for cases involving occupational hearing loss. Violation frequencies of noise standard subparagraphs and relationships to factors such as industry differences were analyzed using descriptive statistics and t tests. RESULTS The most commonly violated noise standard was 1910.95 in manufacturing. Such violations rose between 1972 and 1985 and then declined steadily. Whether in general industry or construction, four noise standards were most-frequently cited: lack of feasible administrative or engineering controls (1910.95[b] and 1926.52[d]) and inadequate hearing conservation program (1910.95[c] and 1926.52[b]). These violations were more highly penalized (mean = $1036.50) than other subparagraph violations (mean = $915.80). Programmed and unprogrammed inspections generated similar violation quantities except between 1980 and 1985, when programmed inspections exhibited a sharp spike in violations. CONCLUSION The study identified trends in OSHA noise standard violations and possible explanations for those trends. The study findings can support development of more practical noise-exposure protection policy.

[1]  R. Neitzel,et al.  Patterns and trends in OSHA occupational noise exposure measurements from 1979 to 2013 , 2018, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[2]  Ellen Kerns,et al.  Cardiovascular conditions, hearing difficulty, and occupational noise exposure within US industries and occupations , 2018, American journal of industrial medicine.

[3]  R. Dobie Cost-Effective Hearing Conservation: Regulatory and Research Priorities , 2017, Ear and hearing.

[4]  R. Neitzel,et al.  Historical review of efforts to reduce noise‐induced hearing loss in the United States , 2017, American journal of industrial medicine.

[5]  Marie Haring Sweeney,et al.  Prevalence of Workers With Shifts in Hearing by Industry: A Comparison of OSHA and NIOSH Hearing Shift Criteria , 2014, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[6]  K. Ringen,et al.  The Construction Industry , 2006, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[7]  P. Middendorf Surveillance of occupational noise exposures using OSHA's Integrated Management Information System. , 2004, American journal of industrial medicine.

[8]  M. Cullen,et al.  Impact of OSHA Final Rule—Recording Hearing Loss: An Analysis of an Industrial Audiometric Dataset , 2003, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[9]  A. Suter The hearing conservation amendment: 25 years later. , 2009, Noise & health.

[10]  Standards Improvement Project-Phase II. Final rule. , 2005, Federal register.

[11]  Occupational injury and illness recording and reporting requirements. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), U.S. Department of Labor. Final rule. , 2001, Federal register.

[12]  PETER T. PARASHEs,et al.  A Legal Overview of the OSHA Noise Standard , 1979 .