Classifying Treated vs. Untreated MDD Adolescents from Anatomical Connectivity using Nonlinear SVM

Identification of the treatment-related responders for adolescent Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is urgently needed to develop effective treatments. In this paper, machine learning based classifiers are used to reveal anatomical features as responders for distinguishing MDD patients who have received treatment from those who never received any treatment. The features are drawn from two sets of measurements: 1) anatomical connectivity defined by diffusion tensor imaging measurements between a pair of brain regions, and 2) topological measurements from anatomical networks. Feature selection was performed based on p-value and minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) method to achieve improved classification accuracy. The classification performance is evaluated with a leave-one-out cross-validation method using 37 treated and 15 untreated subjects. The proposed methodology achieves 73% accuracy, 100% specificity, and 100% precision for 52 subjects. The most distinguishing features are the strength of the right hippocampus of the mean diffusivity (MD) network at 18% density and of the track-count (TR) network, the participation coefficient of the left middle temporal gyrus of the radial diffusivity (RD) network at 20% density, the axial diffusivity (AD) connectivity between right middle temporal gyrus and right supramarginal gyrus, the betweenness centrality of the right hippocampus of the TR network at 11% density, the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) connectivity between the left pars opercularis and the left rostral anterior cingulate cortex, the clustering coefficient of the middle anterior corpus callosum of the TR network at 11% density, and the AD connectivity between the left pars opercularis and the left rostral anterior cingulate cortex.

[1]  Michelle Thai,et al.  Neural and neuroendocrine predictors of pharmacological treatment response in adolescents with depression: A preliminary study , 2018, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry.

[2]  Christophe Lenglet,et al.  Function-specific and Enhanced Brain Structural Connectivity Mapping via Joint Modeling of Diffusion and Functional MRI , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[3]  A L Brody,et al.  Prefrontal-subcortical and limbic circuit mediation of major depressive disorder. , 2001, Seminars in clinical neuropsychiatry.

[4]  Peter Seres,et al.  Structural changes in the hippocampus in major depressive disorder: contributions of disease and treatment. , 2010, Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN.

[5]  Keshab K. Parhi,et al.  Classification of borderline personality disorder based on spectral power of resting-state fMRI , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[6]  G. Dichter,et al.  A systematic review of relations between resting-state functional-MRI and treatment response in major depressive disorder. , 2015, Journal of affective disorders.

[7]  Joel Swendsen,et al.  Major depression in the national comorbidity survey-adolescent supplement: prevalence, correlates, and treatment. , 2015, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[8]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Cerebral Cortex doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm167 Anatomical Connectivity of the Subgenual Cingulate Region Targeted with Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression , 2007 .

[9]  Maura L Furey,et al.  Relationship between amygdala responses to masked faces and mood state and treatment in major depressive disorder. , 2010, Archives of general psychiatry.

[10]  Justin K. Rajendra,et al.  Defining Critical White Matter Pathways Mediating Successful Subcallosal Cingulate Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression , 2014, Biological Psychiatry.

[11]  Jazmin Camchong,et al.  Altered white matter microstructure in adolescents with major depression: a preliminary study. , 2010, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[12]  Jazmin Camchong,et al.  Neural Correlates of Antidepressant Treatment Response in Adolescents with Major Depressive Disorder. , 2016, Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology.

[13]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[14]  Runa Bhaumik,et al.  Multidimensional prediction of treatment response to antidepressants with cognitive control and functional MRI , 2017, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[15]  M. Mintun,et al.  Increased amygdala response to masked emotional faces in depressed subjects resolves with antidepressant treatment: an fMRI study , 2001, Biological Psychiatry.

[16]  Kathryn R. Cullen,et al.  Toward dysfunctional connectivity: a review of neuroimaging findings in pediatric major depressive disorder , 2011, Brain Imaging and Behavior.

[17]  R. Davidson,et al.  Anterior cingulate activity as a predictor of degree of treatment response in major depression: evidence from brain electrical tomography analysis. , 2001, The American journal of psychiatry.

[18]  P. Basser Diffusion MRI: From Quantitative Measurement to In vivo Neuroanatomy , 2009 .

[19]  John Suckling,et al.  Attenuation of the neural response to sad faces in major depression by antidepressant treatment: a prospective, event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study. , 2004, Archives of general psychiatry.

[20]  J. Yeatman,et al.  Diffusion Tensor Imaging: A Review for Pediatric Researchers and Clinicians , 2010, Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP.