Institutional transformation of S&T systems in the European economies in transition: Comparative analysis

In all Central and East European Countries (CEEC) the first phase of transformation comprised the dissolution and fragmentation of the socialist S&T system through top-down and bottom-up processes, and was linked to S&T personnel being cutback to approximately 20 to 50% of the former peak level. Subsequent to this the restructuring of S&T performing institutions and their 'environments' in politics and economy commenced. In this second phase the progress made by the CEEC in their institutional transformation has varied: A group of advanced countries (I) consists of Poland, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Estonia and Slovenia. With the restructuring of S&T organisations and activities they have substantially completed the second phase of transformation. They are now faced with the task of creating a modern S&T system by interlinking the newly formed actors in science, the economy and politics (Phase 3). Countries of the Group II have introduced institutional changes through new bodies, laws, competitive R&D funding, etc. but have not yet fully implemented them in practice due to instability in the economy. A third group of countries has established a stable framework for S&T neither in the economy (continuing decline in GDP) nor in politics. Typical problems faced by all countries undergoing transformation are the disproportions between 'academic' science and weak industrial R&D, the increase in the percentage of older scientists, in particular in the natural sciences and technical disciplines, and the underdeveloped infrastructure in S&T. This situation leads to differences in the future of S&T systems as well as in the main focus of S&T policy in the individual CEEC, which ranges from continual restructuring to international integration.

[1]  Fritz W. Scharpf,et al.  Gesellschaftliche Selbstregelung und politische Steuerung , 1995 .

[2]  David A. Dyker,et al.  The technology of transition : science and technology policies for transition countries , 1997 .

[3]  Jochen Gläser,et al.  Kognitive Neuorientierung der ostdeutschen außeruniversitären Grundlagenforschung als Folge des Institutionentransfers , 1998 .

[4]  D. Braun.  Die politische Steuerung der Wissenschaft: ein Beitrag zum »kooperativen Staat« , 1997 .

[5]  G. Laudel,et al.  What are institutional boundaries and how can they be overcome? Germany's collaborative research centres as boundary-spanning networks , 1998 .

[6]  Compromised Futures: The Consequences of an Aging Research Staff , 1998 .

[7]  Werner Meske,et al.  Transforming science and technology systems, the endless transition? , 1998 .

[8]  Katalin Balázs,et al.  Transformation of the Research Systems of Post-Communist Central and Eastern Europe: An Introduction , 1995 .

[9]  Ulrich Schmoch,et al.  Organisation of science and technology at the watershed : the academic and industrial perspective , 1996 .

[10]  W. Ruprecht,et al.  Der Netzwerk-Ansatz der FuE-Förderung für die neuen Bundesländer — Das Beispiel des Programms „Auftragsforschung West — Ost“ , 1998 .

[11]  W. Meske.  Öffentliche Forschung als notwendige Infrastruktur für Innovationen in Ostdeutschland , 1998 .

[12]  W. Diebold,et al.  Soviet industry from Stalin to Gorbachev , 1988 .

[13]  C. Freeman.  Technology, policy, and economic performance , 1987 .

[14]  Jochen Gläser,et al.  Anwendungsorientierung von Grundlagenforschung? Erfahrungen der Akademie der Wissenschaften der DDR , 1996 .

[15]  Alfred Spielkamp.  Industrielle Forschung und Entwicklung in Ostdeutschland , 1998 .

[16]  W. Krohn,et al.  Die Selbstorganisation der Wissenschaft , 1989 .

[17]  Renate Mayntz,et al.  Deutsche Forschung im Einigungsprozeß: Die Transformation der Akademie der Wissenschaften der DDR 1989 bis 1992 , 1994 .

[18]  S. Radosevic.  Divergence or convergence in research and development and innovation between 'East' and 'West'? , 1999 .

[19]  Kiyoshi Ikemoto,et al.  Economics in Transition , 1997 .

[20]  U. Schimank.  Die Transformation der Forschungssysteme der mittel- und osteuropäischen Länder: Gemeinsamkeiten von Problemlagen und Problembearbeitung' , 1995 .

[21]  Hans-Peter Krüger,et al.  Wissenschaft, Das Problem Ihrer Entwicklung , 1987 .

[22]  N. Stern.  The transition in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union: some strategic lessons from the experience of 25 countries over six years , 1997 .

[23]  Kurt Hornschild.  FuE-Förderung in Ostdeutschland durch das Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft — Ergebnisse aus einer Wirkungsanalyse , 1998 .

[24]  L. Graham.  The Formation of Soviet Research Institutes: A Combination of Revolutionary Innovation and International Borrowing , 1975, Social studies of science.