Analysis, control and augmentation of microcantilever deflections in bio-sensing systems

The main causes for the deflection of microcantilevers embedded in micromechanical biodetection systems are investigated. The primary deflection due to the chemical reaction between the analyte molecules and the receptor coating, which produces surface stresses on the receptor side is analyzed. Oscillating flow conditions, which are the main source of turbulence, are found to produce substantial deflections at relatively large frequency of turbulence. Bimaterial effects influencing the microcantilever deflections are established analytically, and found to be prominent at a relatively low frequency of turbulence. In the absence of bimaterial effects, turbulence increases the deflection due to chemical reactions at relatively large frequency of turbulence yet it increases the noise due to the increased dynamical effects of the flow on the microcantilever. The mechanical design and optimization of piezoresistive cantilevers for detecting changes in surface stress via finite element analysis is also discussed. The introduction of stress concentration regions (SCR) during cantilever fabrication greatly enhances the detection sensitivity. Biosensing experiments based on resonance frequency shift are presented, which show that the results strongly depend on the interaction of specific analytes with the receptor surface. Finally, novel microcantilever assemblies are presented for the first time that can increase the deflection due to chemical reaction while decreasing those due to flow dynamical effects.

[1]  Roberto Raiteri,et al.  Sensing of biological substances based on the bending of microfabricated cantilevers , 1999 .

[2]  D. Giddens,et al.  Effects of wall shear stress and fluid recirculation on the localization of circulating monocytes in a three-dimensional flow model. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  Tuan Vo-Dinh,et al.  Nanosensors and biochips: frontiers in biomolecular diagnostics , 2001 .

[4]  D. Hammer,et al.  The forward rate of binding of surface-tethered reactants: effect of relative motion between two surfaces. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[5]  M. Welland,et al.  Microcantilever-based biosensors , 2000, Ultramicroscopy.

[6]  P. Lu,et al.  ANALYSIS OF SURFACE EFFECTS ON MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF MICROCANTILEVERS , 2001 .

[7]  A K Chakraborty,et al.  Origin of nanomechanical cantilever motion generated from biomolecular interactions. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  T. Kenny,et al.  High-sensitivity piezoresistive cantilevers under 1000 Å thick , 1999 .

[9]  Panos G. Datskos,et al.  Gold Nano-Structures for Transduction of Biomolecular Interactions into Micrometer Scale Movements , 2001 .

[10]  H. Rothuizen,et al.  Translating biomolecular recognition into nanomechanics. , 2000, Science.

[11]  A. Ulman,et al.  Formation and Structure of Self-Assembled Monolayers. , 1996, Chemical reviews.

[12]  Ramakrishnan,et al.  A Predictive Approach Using Fractal Analysis for Analyte-Receptor Binding and Dissociation Kinetics for Surface Plasmon Resonance Biosensor Applications. , 2000, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[13]  Anja Boisen,et al.  A microcantilever-based alcohol vapor sensor-application and response model , 2000 .

[14]  J. Thaysen,et al.  Environmental sensors based on micromachined cantilevers with integrated read-out , 2000, Ultramicroscopy.

[15]  D. Hammer,et al.  Kinetics of adhesion of IgE-sensitized rat basophilic leukemia cells to surface-immobilized antigen in Couette flow. , 1998, Biophysical journal.