To share or not to share in the emerging era of big data: perspectives from fish telemetry researchers on data sharing

The potential for telemetry data to answer complex questions about aquatic animals and their interactions with the environment is limited by the capacity to store, manage, and access data across the research community. Large telemetry networks and databases exist, but are limited by the actions of researchers to share their telemetry data. Promoting data sharing and understanding researchers’ views on open practices is a major step toward enhancing the role of big data in ecology and resources management. We surveyed 307 fish telemetry researchers to understand their perspectives and experiences on data sharing. A logistic regression revealed that data sharing was positively related to researchers with collaborative tendencies, who belong to a telemetry network, who are prolific publishers, and who express altruistic motives for their research. Researchers were less likely to have shared telemetry data if they engage in radio and (or) acoustic telemetry, work for regional government, and value the time it...

[1]  Simon Fraser Factors in Overcoming Barriers to Implementing Co − management in British Columbia Salmon Fisheries , 2000 .

[2]  Steven J. Cooke,et al.  Ocean Tracking Network Canada: A Network Approach to Addressing Critical Issues in Fisheries and Resource Management with Implications for Ocean Governance , 2011 .

[3]  Satrajit S. Ghosh,et al.  Data sharing in neuroimaging research , 2012, Front. Neuroinform..

[4]  David W. Welch,et al.  POST–the Pacific Ocean salmon tracking project , 2002 .

[5]  S. Batten,et al.  Large-Scale Marine and Freshwater Movements of White Sturgeon , 2006 .

[6]  R. Kays,et al.  Terrestrial animal tracking as an eye on life and planet , 2015, Science.

[7]  Jeffrey M. Stanton,et al.  Institutional and Individual Influences on Scientists' Data Sharing Practices , 2012 .

[8]  Matthew B. Jones,et al.  Challenges and Opportunities of Open Data in Ecology , 2011, Science.

[9]  William W. Taylor,et al.  How to Manage Data to Enhance Their Potential for Synthesis, Preservation, Sharing, and Reuse—A Great Lakes Case Study , 2013 .

[10]  S. Cooke Biotelemetry and biologging in endangered species research and animal conservation: relevance to regional, national, and IUCN Red List threat assessments , 2008 .

[11]  Brian C. Martinson,et al.  The Perverse Effects of Competition on Scientists’ Work and Relationships , 2007, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[12]  J. Cook,et al.  The World Ocean , 2013 .

[13]  Susann Fiedler,et al.  Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices: A Simple, Low-Cost, Effective Method for Increasing Transparency , 2016, PLoS biology.

[14]  Steven J. Cooke,et al.  Troubling issues at the frontier of animal tracking for conservation and management , 2017, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[15]  C. Ball,et al.  Submission of Microarray Data to Public Repositories , 2004, PLoS biology.

[16]  Markus Neteler,et al.  Wildlife tracking data management: a new vision , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  Michael Witt,et al.  Data sharing, small science and institutional repositories , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[18]  Kalpana Shankar,et al.  Data sharing in the sciences , 2011, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[19]  Gavin B. Stewart,et al.  Meta-analysis in applied ecology , 2010, Biology Letters.

[20]  Heather A. Piwowar,et al.  Sharing Detailed Research Data Is Associated with Increased Citation Rate , 2007, PloS one.

[21]  A response to Poisot et al.: Publishing your dataset is not always virtuous , 2013 .

[22]  P. Allotey,et al.  Data sharing in medical research: an empirical investigation. , 2001, Bioethics.

[23]  M. H. Cooper,et al.  Commercialization of the University and Problem Choice by Academic Biological Scientists , 2009 .

[24]  Geoffrey C. Bowker,et al.  Promoting Access to Public Research Data for Scientific, Economic, and Social Development , 2004, Data Sci. J..

[25]  John P. Walsh,et al.  A plea for standards , 1972, COMG.

[26]  B. Godley,et al.  Satellite Tracking and Analysis Tool (STAT): an integrated system for archiving, analyzing and mapping animal tracking data , 2005 .

[27]  Dominique Gravel,et al.  Moving toward a sustainable ecological science: don't let data go to waste! , 2013 .

[28]  Stephen H. Koslow,et al.  Should the neuroscience community make a paradigm shift to sharing primary data? , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  S. Tilak,et al.  The Movebank data model for animal tracking , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[30]  A. Budden,et al.  Big data and the future of ecology , 2013 .

[31]  Kim Holland,et al.  Key Questions in Marine Megafauna Movement Ecology. , 2016, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[32]  Christopher M Holbrook,et al.  Acoustic telemetry and fisheries management. , 2017, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[33]  David L. Wheeler,et al.  GenBank , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..

[34]  Essie Rodgers,et al.  Finding our way: On the sharing and reuse of animal telemetry data in Australasia. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[35]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government , 2012, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[36]  Matthew E. Watts,et al.  Integrating research using animal‐borne telemetry with the needs of conservation management , 2017 .

[37]  M. P. Cummings,et al.  Data sharing in ecology and evolution. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[38]  Steven J. Cooke,et al.  Making connections in aquatic ecosystems with acoustic telemetry monitoring , 2014 .

[39]  Milton Packer,et al.  Data sharing in medical research , 2018, British Medical Journal.

[40]  Carl Wunsch,et al.  Estimates of the Southern Ocean general circulation improved by animal‐borne instruments , 2013 .

[41]  T. Tamura,et al.  The suppression of Antarctic bottom water formation by melting ice shelves in Prydz Bay , 2016, Nature Communications.

[42]  T L Spires-Jones,et al.  Opening up: open access publishing, data sharing, and how they can influence your neuroscience career , 2016, The European journal of neuroscience.

[43]  Mark John Costello Motivating Online Publication of Data , 2009 .

[44]  J. Meeuwig,et al.  When Science Places Threatened Species at Risk , 2015 .

[45]  C. Lynch Big data: How do your data grow? , 2008, Nature.

[46]  M. Whitlock Data archiving in ecology and evolution: best practices. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[47]  G Eysenbach,et al.  Code of conduct is needed for publishing raw data , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[48]  A. Vickers Whose data set is it anyway? Sharing raw data from randomized trials , 2006, Trials.

[49]  John H. Porter,et al.  A Brief History of Data Sharing in the U.S. Long Term Ecological Research Network , 2010 .

[50]  J. Kocik,et al.  Aquatic animal telemetry: A panoramic window into the underwater world , 2015, Science.

[51]  James A. Evans Industry collaboration, scientific sharing, and the dissemination of knowledge , 2010 .

[52]  Bernhard Seeger,et al.  The user's view on biodiversity data sharing - Investigating facts of acceptance and requirements to realize a sustainable use of research data - , 2012, Ecol. Informatics.

[53]  Patrick J Butler,et al.  Biotelemetry: a mechanistic approach to ecology. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[54]  Francesca Cagnacci,et al.  A plea for standards in reporting data collected by animal-borne electronic devices , 2016, Animal Biotelemetry.

[55]  Bryn Nelson Data sharing: Empty archives , 2009, Nature.

[56]  D. R. Johnson,et al.  The World Ocean Database , 2013, Data Sci. J..

[57]  J. M. Price,et al.  Toward a national animal telemetry network for aquatic observations in the United States , 2016, Animal Biotelemetry.

[58]  P. Timothée,et al.  Moving toward a sustainable ecological science: don , 2013 .

[59]  Martin Wetzels,et al.  Response Rate and Response Quality of Internet-Based Surveys: An Experimental Study , 2004 .

[60]  Steven J. Cooke,et al.  To Tag or not to Tag: Animal Welfare, Conservation, and Stakeholder Considerations in Fish Tracking Studies That Use Electronic Tags , 2013 .

[61]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  The conundrum of sharing research data , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[62]  K. Knorr Cetina Epistemic Cultures , 1999 .

[63]  Winston A Hide,et al.  Big data: The future of biocuration , 2008, Nature.

[64]  C. Holbrook,et al.  Tracking animals in freshwater with electronic tags: past, present and future , 2013, Animal Biotelemetry.

[65]  Eric G Campbell,et al.  Data-sharing and data-withholding in genetics and the life sciences: results of a national survey of technology transfer officers. , 2003, Journal of health care law & policy.

[66]  A. T. Fisk,et al.  A review of detection range testing in aquatic passive acoustic telemetry studies , 2013, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[67]  C. Tenopir,et al.  Data Sharing by Scientists: Practices and Perceptions , 2011, PloS one.

[68]  Evelyn Pinkerton,et al.  Factors in Overcoming Barriers to Implementing Co-management in British Columbia Salmon Fisheries , 1999 .

[69]  Greg Reed Ocean Data Portal: A Standards Approach to Data Access and Dissemination , 2010 .

[70]  Noel Enyedy,et al.  Little science confronts the data deluge: habitat ecology, embedded sensor networks, and digital libraries , 2007, International Journal on Digital Libraries.

[71]  Ralph Matthews,et al.  The Aquaculture Controversy in Canada: Activism, Policy, and Contested Science , 2010 .

[72]  Claire Thomas,et al.  Biodiversity. Biodiversity databases spread, prompting unification call. , 2009, Science.